home   newsroom     who we are    missions    history    related links     Kids Corner
USACE Home Page Philadelphia District Home Page

Project Links

Questionsquestions Public Affairs
Contact: Ed Voigt

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wanamaker Building,
Room 600
100 Penn Square East
Phila, PA 19107-3390

Phone: 215-656-6515
FAX: 215-656-6820

Security Privacy & Security

External Links

The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute an endorsement by the US Army Corps of Engineers of the Web site or the information, products or services contained therein.  The US Army Corps of Engineers does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations.  Links are provided consistent with the purpose of this DoD Web site.
 

Francis E. Walter Dam Public Comments

2008 FEW Plan Consolidated Comments


January 17, 2008

I love the Lehigh! It's my favorite river to paddle since it's beautiful and not too crazy. Whenever I come off the river after a day of paddling I feel invigorated and thrilled. So thank you, thank you for making the summertime releases possible. Paddling is a major turn on and I hope you give it a try some time.

Also, whenever I'm up in White Haven, I try to eat at a local spot like the Ugly Mug or the diner in town or some of the newer fast food joints on the edge of town near the turnpike. I like White Haven and try to respect the area like it's my own home. I guess, in a way, it is a second home since I go up there so often -- whenever the Army Corp of Engineers announce releases! Ye-ha, guys, thank you!


January 17, 2008

I am a member and instructor for both the Philadelphia Canoe Club and the Wilmington Trail Club.

I am writing to let you know how much the Lehigh River and the releases are appreciated by the paddling community. Over the past 10 years, as a certified ACA kayak instructor, I have taught many people the joy of kayaking on the Lehigh River. It is a beautiful environment to safely show people how to negotiate whitewater and to have fun doing a sport they may never have a chance to learn if not for the releases on the river. It is an excellent "home river" for the local paddling clubs.

We hold our training sessions in May and June and then encourage the graduates to come on sponsored club trips over the summer months to continue their learning experience and improve their skills. On most trips the Wilmington Trail Club, a small club, will have from 30 to 50 people. In addition, I know people who travel from New York, Delaware, Maryland and even the New England states to paddle the Lehigh on release weekends. We all contribute to the economy in the area by shopping in the local stores, staying overnight and eating in White Haven and the surrounding area. Just ask the owners of the Ugly Mug how much their business increases on release weekend.

So please understand how important the Lehigh River releases are to not only myself but to all the other individuals we introduce to the scenic area in the Poconos.

Thank you


July 22, 2007

Just wanted to say thanks for the damn release. We took a Saturday tour with White Water Challengers and the damn release made it that much better. Just writing to show that we appreciate the releases.

Thanks again,


July 22, 2007

hi there,

We would like to share with you our fantastic voyage down the Lehigh River with the White Water Challenge group in White Haven, PA. The 9 mile trip, the day, the atmosphere and the enviroment were all in perfect harmony for our novice but exhilerating enjoyment in a 6 man raft with 15 other rafts full of enthusiasts all enjoying the same. Thank you for storing extra water and releasing it during the summer for all to enjoy. We were vacationing in PA and thoroughly enjoyed everything we did. You didn't even know the part you had in our vacation plans. We will absolutely be back, and we have spread the word to other friends and family. It is great to get out and enjoy nature and the way you can control the water amazes me. The concept is great.

Thank you again for your part in our vacation.


July 22, 2007

Hi
My name is Star and I wanted to say Thanks. I planed my trip around July 7 th and 8 th dam releace dates and I am so glad I did it was great. I was the group leader and the only one who and ever rafted before and I Fell Out then got plowed by another raft but was okay and came up laughing we all had so much fun. Thanks again and Please keep up the good work.

From happy rafter,


July 21, 2007

Dear Sir/Mam,

I really enjoyed my rafting experience with the Whitewater Challenger recently.

I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to the Corps of Engineers to store extra water at Francis Walter Dam in the spring so we could enjoy it in the summer.

Thank you.


July 11, 2007

To Everyone at the Army Corp of Engineers-

Thank you so very much for making my first Whitewater rafting day a fabulous memory. I was scared to death at first, but ended up having so much fun and enjoying the day beyond belief. I will definitely be back to Whitewater Challengers again as they were all wonderful, caring and very knowledgeable.


July 8, 2007

Hey!
I just wanted to drop a line and say that we had a BLAST whitewater rafting
down the Lehigh on saturday. What made it even better was the damn release!!
The rapids were great! Thanks for being involved with Whitewater
Challengers!!!
Keep it up ;0)


July 5, 2007

I wanted to take a brief moment to express my appreciation to the Army Corps of Engineers for the dam release program that has had a dramtically positive impact on the ability of boaters to enjoy the Lehigh River during the 2007 summer whitewater season.
Despite the dry summer thus far, the Corps has gone out of its way to maintain usable flows on as many scheduled release days as possible, including a very challanging June 23rd release. These releases have provided a water level that allows thousands of
boaters, both private and commercial guests, to appreciate this waterway in a manner than would not be possible without the efforts of the Corps and this program.

I realize that this program is under constant evaulation, as it should be. I hope that the
appreciation that I express, which is echoed by countless other Lehigh boaters, will encourage the continuation and expansion of this program.

Thank you again.


July 2, 2007

Your willingness to allocate that little extra water for the June 23rd release is greatly appreciated. With so few opportunities to participate in my most loved diversion, loss of even one day would feel rather significant.

Imagine if bicyclists could only ride once every two weeks between May 1 and September 30. And then come to learn that some or many of those opportunities go by the wayside due to conditions unrelated to the rider's availability.

Yes, I appreciate all of the efforts of the Corps that make these releases happen.

I have become aware of several options for enhancing whitewater opportunities and would ask you to consider their merits. Among these are:

1) Redefining the period of in-lake "fish spawn sensitivity
2) Raising the temporary recreational pool elevation
3) Permitting a 6 or 7 foot drawn down during the in-lake fish spawn period
4) Doing away with the in-lake fish spawn restrictions, entirely with the support of many fisherman whose interest is in downriver fishing, not at the dam
5) Scaling back the fishing and whitewater flow targets during dry years (or when it seems likely that whitewater events in May/June will consume water that cannot be re-gathered before the next event)

Again, thank your for your efforts.


June 29, 2007

I would like to extend a personal thank you to those at the USACE who have gone the extra mile to insure regular dam releases on the Lehigh River. As a private boater I struggle during the summer months to find places for whitewater boating. It's great to see that my recreational priorities are valued by an agency that has so many different factors to consider. By working with the Corps of Engineers in Ky, I learned about many of the
variables that go into the decision making process. I'm not one to underestimate the difficulty in providing a service to all the different parties with an interest in the river. I'm certain that your new release schedule is having a positive financial impact in the local economies. I find that I spend half of my weekends now someplace between White Haven and Bowmanstown. While my contributions are limited mostly to fuel and food
purchases, the assurance of quality water has allowed the rafting companies to grow and that translates more directly into jobs.

I have been spreading the word to others as well. The Corps of Engineers
deserves an extra thank you from all of us.


June 29, 2007

Dear Army Corps of Engineers:

I just wanted to send a quick note to let you know how much I appreciate your consideration for whitewater boaters and the extra release of water on June 23, 2007. I know that release was supposed to be cancelled, and by sharing some water with us, it turned out to be a beautiful weekend on the river.

For many of us, the Lehigh river is a weekend retreat, where we can leave the office behind and play in the rapids in our kayaks. I am not sure how often you guys get to hear that, when you are up at the dam.

I also happen to be a river guide for Whitewater Challengers and we had many smiling guests that weekend, who travelled from various states to enjoy our river. With this new, reliable schedule of a release every other weekend, many families said they will come back next year as well. We are all working together to boost the economy in our area.

So once again, thank you for the beautiful weekend!


June 29, 2007

As a long time boater (kayak, canoe and raft) and resident of nearby Luzerne County I would like to express my appreciation for the new release schedule you have on the Lehigh River from the Francis Walter Dam. The Lehigh River is a beautiful river and I feel fortunate to have it in my "back yard" to enjoy. I know how hard it is to balance all the parties that have interest in the river. I can appreciate the different concerns. I realize this is an evolving process. I just wanted to take a moment to express my thanks for doing what you can to make these summer releases happen. I look forward to many more days of paddling on my favorite river. Thank you so much.

June 29, 2007

The job that the Army Corp of Engineers has done at the Francis E. Walter Dam on the Lehigh River has been remarkable and is hugely appreciated!!!

The dam releases supporting the river paddling activities has been greatly appreciated, especially with the dry conditions in the watershed. And especially with the June 23rd release!!!!!!

The dam releases have gone a long way to change the Lehigh's reputation as the "newhigh river". Our paddling clubs, private boaters, whitewater rafting groups all look forward to the great paddling opportunities on the Lehigh made possible by your work at the dam!

Some thoughts for continuous improvement of the water releases:

* Raise the temporary recreation pool elevation to 1375.
* Do away with the in-lake fish spawn restrictions entirely - my observations are that the most fishermen are on the river and not in the lake. It seems that the May/June rains are going to be what they are and the objective of keeping a stable lake level seems impractical and unsustainable.
* For future dry years (or when river activities paddling or boating (whitewater) events in May/June will consume water that cannot be regathered before the next event) scale back the fishing and whitewater flow targets proportionally. 20% for example: from 1,000 cfs to 800 cfs for whitewater weekends and 250 cfs to 200 cfs for mid-week flow.

There has been a great improvement in the opportunities to enjoy the Lehigh thanks to your efforts and I really look forward to more opportunities in the future.

People come from more than 5 surrounding states to enjoy our river and you make that possible!


June 28, 2007

I am river guide at Whitewater Challengers, I just wanted to take a minute to express my gratitude for making the June 23 release possible. It really does make a world of difference to me when we have water to run the whitewater sections of the river, and the customers enjoy being able to experience those sections as well. I appreciate that you guys take the time to work with us so that us boaters can have scheduled releases, and I would completley support any changes that would enhance the reliability of the release schedule now in place. Keep up the great work!


June 28, 2007

I just wanted to say thank you so much for your dam release weekend that you afforded us on June 23rd. Last year, my group of ten had to reschedule due to lack of rain that year. I was quite nervous it would be the same this year. This could have been disastrous since my group consists of weekend laborers and they had to take off for this.

So.....

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!!!!!!


June 28, 2007

I wanted to write to thank the Corps and express my appreciation for the work you're doing with dam releases on the Lehigh River. Water levels have become much more boater-friendly over the last few years. In particular, I wanted to acknowledge the extra efforts you made to save the June 23 release, in spite of some very challenging (very dry) conditions in the watershed.

I value the boating opportunities presented by these whitewater releases, and look forward to future changes that will enhance the reliability of the release schedule
that's now in place. I hope that these changes will include:

1. Raising the temporary recreation pool elevation to 1375 rather than the current 1365.

2. In dry years (or when it seems likely that whitewater events in May/June will consume water that cannot be re-gathered before the next event) scale back the fishing and whitewater flow targets proportionally .... by 20% .... from 1,000 cfs to 800 cfs for whitewater, and from 250 cfs to 200 cfs for mid week flows.

Thanks again for your consideration and hard work.
It is much appreciated.


June 28, 2007

I just wanted to say, that as a boater on the Lehigh and an employee of Whitewater Challengers, I appreciate the trouble that you have all gone through to make these dam releases happen this summer in spite of the very dry conditions. It is such a help to not only the rafting companies and the experiences of the guests, but to the individual boaters also. Being a beginner boater, the opportunities presented by the dam releases help me in becoming a better boater and I wanted to voice my appreciation to all of you at the Army Corps. Keep those releases coming!! They are very much appreciated by the boating community.

Thank You!


June 28, 2007

I just want to tell you that the last 2 dam releases made for a great time.
I took a group of 6 of us on 6/9 and a group of 3 of us on 6/23. I moved
to Allentown from Long Island so I need all the water-based activities that
I can get here. Keep it up.


June 27, 2007

Thank you for the releases the last two weekends

I really appreciate your efforts and look forward to the rest of the season.


June 21, 2007

Gentlemen:

Let me being by recognizing that the improvements the Corp has made with storing and releasing water at the FEW Dam over the past few years have been absolutely terrific! Being a long-time paddler of the Lehigh, I have seen the crowds and the excitement about the Lehigh grow as each additional release weekend occurs. Kudos for the changes that have been made!

I'd like to suggest, to make things even better, that the Corps also consider the natural flow when setting the release amount. 750 CFS out of the dam is great when it gets the Lehighton gauge to 1500. While the Upper is always paddleable at 750, when this amount only gets the Lehighton gauge to 900, it makes the lower section nearly impassable, and a long, boring rocky day at a minimum. I'd like to see the goal of the release to be to get the Lehighton gauge up to a certain level, and I think 1200 should be an absolute minimum.

Also, I'm puzzled by the last release being cut back on Saturday and cancelled on Sunday. OK, I can see the Sunday release being cancelled in case it continues to be dry so that we can preserve more Saturday releases, but I don't get cutting back Saturday to 650. At 650, the Upper section is marginal (I didn't bother going and I'm a diehard) and with the very limited natural flow from the feeders, the lower was unrunnable as I mentioned above. The water is there so why isn't it being used? When it is exceptionally dry as it has been, it would seem we should be seeing more water come out of the dam on the release day to make up for the low flow of the feeders, not less.

I'm sure the answer is the effort to preserve the water. Please remember that 7 good releases beats 10 crappy releases. The outfitters may have 10 weekends of reservations, but they know as well as anyone, that when the river is low, they have unsatisfied customers that will not return. So, striving to have 10 releases by reducing the flow to what I think is an unacceptable level may keep the cash coming in this year, but it will hurt in the long term as boaters get bored and frustrated with the Lehigh and stop coming back.

A wonderful thing is happening with the Lehigh...please keep the excitement going and provide a better flow for as many Saturdays as the stored water in the dam will allow. If things are dry, increase the release to make up for the lack if feeder stream flow.

Thank you.


May 11, 2007

Thanks for the added releases once again. I just had a suggestion for weekends that are three day weekends (Memorial Day, July 4th, Labor Day) to have 3 day releases if possible for some of these times. Also, more 1500/2000 CFS releases would be appreciated. I know the storage is an issue, just wanted to throw in a suggestion or two.


May 11, 2007

Thanks for the 1000 release. It's the ideal level for boaters.


May 2, 2007

I know you have plenty of water in the FW dam, but can't you slow down the cfm for a day or two, couldn't fish the whole month of April because the river was to high. Only had a couple of nice days in April that you had a chance to go fishing but you had the cfms up to high. I know you have maintain the dam at 1330 feet but you could a lease have some common sense that on some of nice day to fish 'WHICH WASN'T TO MANY BECAUSE OF WEATHER', they could of lease slow the cfms down, it wasn't going over flow the dam which I seen it a lot higher than what it was. to do any good fishing the cfms could be down to 400cfms.
thank you


January 8, 2007

Thanks for thinking of the paddlers in your release of the Jan 6, 07 weekend. It was spectacular to be able to paddle on a warm day in January. In general, I would like to commend you on excellent river management this past season. We paddlers are particularly grateful for your consideration of us.


December 3, 2006

Lehigh Valley Canoe Club 2006 Comments

Lehigh Valley Canoe Club 2007 Recommedations


December 1, 2006

I think the The Corps did a great job managing the Lehigh river this year with the whitewater releases. The pre release information from the website was reliable and accurate. I'd like to see more of the same in the future with mome more big water release dates added. And if it's convenient, maybe, lake draw-down, big water releases in the fall. Either way it's better now then it ever was in the past. THANKS!
Keep up the good work guys! You rock!


November 27, 2006

I came, I spent, I paddled, I improved my skills, and I enjoyed as many releases as possible from the FEW dam this summer and so did my paddling friends. Many thanks to you for listening to the stakeholders and for working with paddlers to improve the number and the quality of releases for the Lehigh River.
The paddling community is spirited, energetic, athletic and is represented by a broad variety of individuals who love the outdoors, clean moving water and awesome camaraderie. I have paddled with gutsy and talented twelve year old girls and gentleman over 70, welders and doctors and every thing in-between. If their families aren't paddling, they might be biking, hiking or shopping nearby. The releases bring people and money to the environs of the Lehigh River. Please continue to provide regular releases throughout the spring and summer and to provide bigger releases in October. Paddlers will drive hundreds of miles for big water! You pour it, we will paddle it!


November 23, 2006

Rivers Outdoor Adventures Comments


November 21, 2006

I wish to thank you for a wonderful summer and fall of releases. I had a tremendous time planning and participating in paddles every other weekend on the Lehigh. My students are really looking forward to 2007. Hopefully you will be able to do a similar series. Keep up the important and good work you do.


November 14, 2006

Thanks for the best paddling season ever!

750cfs. releases were nice and enjoyable The 1000cfs. and up were a great bonus. Your Thursday postings for the weekend have provided a great planning tool, and much more dependable than the weather forecast.

Your thought and planning definetly shows and should be commended. Keep up the good work, we all look forward to next years season.


November 9, 2006

2007 LCFA Flow Plan Suggestions


March 24, 2006

I was pleased to attend the February meeting for the announcement of the 2006 F E Walter Dam management plan. Thank you to Chris Kocher and the Wildlands Conservancy for hosting the meeting.

Thank you also to the Working Group for recognizing the shortfalls of the 2005 plan, and making improvements for 2006. The 2006 plan is a step in the right direction, and has a much better chance of success than the 2005 plan.

After the announcement, I had enjoyable conversations with several groups. The group from Lehigh Gorge State Park (Kevin Fazinni & Dave Maidl) are enthusiastic supporters of improved whitewater opportunities in the park.

I had a good conversation with Mr. Austin Gerrard. He and Mr. Saul are the authorities on the nuts and bolts operation of the dam. They have a tremendous responsibility of balancing flood control, with other water interests. They would like to see flood control and environmental studies done, to help guide them in this balancing act. Whitewater enthusiasts, and other stakeholders support the studies on the Lehigh.

Another good conversation I had was with Mr. Brokke. He told me there is interest in having more meetings of the stakeholders, similar to the meeting we had to discuss the results of the 2005 plan. I support having these meeting several times each year. The face to face conversation with other stakeholders was very productive. I better understood the positions of others, and could more easily agree to compromise with the other stakeholders when we can discuss issues face to face.

One of these compromises was an issue last year, when fishing stakeholders were against whitewater releases during prime fishing weekends in May and June. Many whitewater stakeholders had no problem giving up some releases in June, we would have them in July and August. Other whitewater enthusiasts argued (accurately) that 1335 pool level could not produce July and August releases. For the 2006 plan, I do not think 1365 pool level can guarantee July and August releases.

I and many others agree that a pool level of 1392 would help with the above compromise, and facilitate many other compromises to satisfy the greatest number of stakeholders.

I feel all stakeholders should support the 2006 plan as a positive step in the right direction, and support studies of a larger pool in the future. I also support more face to face meetings of the stakeholders.



March 20, 2006

I am emailing you to encourage the continued release of the Lehigh for recreational use.

I know that several times a summer myself and some friends meet in the Poconos for a kayak trip down the Lehigh. We are often joined by friends and family (many of whom would never come if it were not for the
whitewater) from Philadelphia and the DC area. Each weekend we are adding to the local economy through the hotels, meals, souvenirs, etc. If it were not for the whitewater, we would go elsewhere (IE Hudson, SW PA).
Last year we canceled 2 weekends last year due to canceled releases - we ended up taking our group and money to upstate new York.

Whitewater recreation of the Lehigh River helps the local economy and is environmentally friendly.

Thank you for your support of recreational use of the Lehigh River.


March 19, 2006

Let the Lehigh run.


“Comments of the Kayak and Canoe Club of New York on the 2006 Lehigh Recreational Plan, March 18, 2006”


March 18, 2006

I am writing in support of the USACE's 2006 release plan for the Lehigh River. While I would like to see more releases of higher volume than those proposed, I also recognize that the plan is a compromise between various recreational interests with a stake in the river. The process of arriving at the plan has convinced me that there is common ground between whitewater boaters and fly-fishermen, and that compromise can result in better recreational opportunities for both groups. We all share the same mania for strenuous, low-tech recreation in beautiful places.

I am a whitewater kayaker and a fisherman. Although I do far more of the former activity recently, and far less of the latter, I suppose I have at least a toe in each camp. I am a member of the Kayak and Canoe Club of New York, an organization that supports balanced use of America's public resources by multiple groups. No one is making any more rivers, so we all have to share the ones we have.

I was impressed to learn that the Lehigh river constitutes 56 percent of the dam-controlled whitewater in Pennsylvania. This makes it especially important to the whitewater community, as planned releases at specific volumes make it possible for groups to run planned trips tailored to the training needs of novice and intermediate paddlers. Most rivers in the state do not have controlled releases and are unavailable in the summer months due to low flow. Of the remaining 44 percent of dam release rivers in the state, none of those in eastern Pennsylvania releases on weekends in the summer. The closest is a 5-hour drive from Philadelphia and is 6-7 hours from the metropolitan New York/New Jersey area, where many of our members live.

The Lehigh is the ONLY river in this region the Mid-Atlantic Region with consistent weekend releases. The loss of the Mongaup River and possibly the Esopus River during the 2006 season, due to overdue dam maintenance in each case, makes a satisfactory season of releases on the Lehigh that much more important to the health of our sport in the region.

I am continually puzzled by the insistence by some parties on maintaining a 5-foot range in May and June in order to foster the growth of a powerboat fishery in the reservoir. In addition to the environmental degradation and danger to non-motorized recreation that powerboats pose, it is clear that the 80 acres of the reservoir at the FEW dam will add little to the 160,000 acres of lakes and ponds mentioned on PA Fish & Boat's website (0.05 percent, or 1/20 of one percent, in fact). And in light of the potential cost to the thousands of whitewater boaters and rafters in terms of missed releases, and to the downstream trout fishery in terms of water that must be dumped or held, rather than released as conservation flows, hardly makes it seem a worthwhile goal.

I would like to thank the USACE and it's agency partners, the members of the paddling and fishing communities, and the area residents and political leaders who have cooperated to make these releases possible. Let's all pray for rain.


March 15, 2006

As a paddling enthusiast, I am writing to support the U.S Army Corps of Engineers program of expanded whitewater recreational releases from the Francis E. Walter Dam on the Lehigh River.

I believe that wherever and whenever recreational releases for whitewater paddling are incorporated into sound environmental management plans for watershed resources, the results are always positive for the communities effected.


March 14, 2006

As a whitewater boater and as a member of the Kayak and Canoe Club of New York (KCCNY), I am writing to support the U.S Army Corps of Engineers program of expanded whitewater recreational releases from the Francis E. Walter Dam on the Lehigh River. While environmental conditions during 2005 were not sufficient to allow for the scheduled number of releases, I feel that the USACE’s plan to raise the pool to 1365 feet offers a better chance for a successful 2006 boating season, while balancing the variety of recreational opportunities that the Lehigh supports. I hope that the information and experience gained during the 2006 season will enable further refinement and improvement of releases in future years

Consistent boatable whitewater releases contribute to the public good by providing high quality recreational activities to a large and growing segment of the public. Thousands of people take advantage of those opportunities, which provides additional benefits to the economy of the region. The extent of these benefits and the economic opportunity that they entail is only beginning to be realized

I would also like to thank the U.S Army Corps of Engineers and other cooperating agencies for allowing this opportunity for public input, and I would also like to thank them as well as those members of the boating and fishing communities who have worked so hard to make these releases possible.


March 14, 2006

As a whitewater boater and as a member of the NewYork/New Jersey chapter of the Appalachian Mountain Club (AMC) and American Whitewater, I am writing to support the U.S Army Corps of Engineers program of expanded whitewater recreational releases from the Francis E. Walter Dam on the Lehigh River. While environmental conditions during 2005 were not sufficient to allow for the scheduled number of releases, I feel that the USACE’s plan to raise the pool to 1365 feet offers a better chance for a successful 2006 boating season, while balancing the variety of recreational opportunities that the Lehigh supports. I hope that the information and experience gained during the 2006 season will enable further refinement and improvement of releases in future years

Consistent boatable whitewater releases contribute to the public good by providing high quality recreational activities to a large and growing segment of the public. Thousands of people take advantage of those opportunities, which provides additional benefits to the economy of the region. The extent of these benefits and the economic opportunity that they entail is only beginning to be realized

I would also like to thank the U.S Army Corps of Engineers and other cooperating agencies for allowing this opportunity for public input, and I would also like to thank them as well as those members of the boating and fishing communities who have worked so hard to make these releases possible.


March 12, 2006

I am the President of Lehigh Valley Whitewater Inc. We are relatively new, one year old, very active whitewater paddling club.
Many of our members must drive to western Pennsylvania or New England to find whitewater paddling during the summer months.
This would not be necessary if the proposed 2006 Lehigh releases occur.
I understand that 2005 was a dry year and that contributed to the canceling of many Lehigh releases. Please consider holding 90-95 feet to assure that adequate water for the whitewater season exists, rather than the proposed 60-65 feet. Whitewater releases of less than 750cfs best serve only one section of river. Please do not disappoint us again this year.
I plan on paddling the Lehigh many times this year and will be spending money on gas and food in the area while there.
I would like the Corp the meet with the Lehigh stakeholders four times a year to further cooperation and communications.
Our club is currently scheduling a raft trip on the Lehigh and I am worried that the trip will have to be canceled due to a lack of pool.
Do you have any suggestions as to what would be the best time to schedule our event?



March 11, 2006

My wife and I are new, last year, white water paddlers and plan to make several trips to the Lehigh Gorge area this coming year as we live only an hour and 15 minutes away from this great whitewater resource. We also bike, hike and camp and this area has everything we are looking for all in one location. We are looking forward to many enjoyable outings in your area this year.

I just want to take this opportunity to thank all involved for the work going into the release program for the Lehigh to improve the paddling on the river. We already made two biking trips up and down the railtrail in the past month just to explore the area and get a look at the river at varying levels in preparation for the coming season of paddling.

Thank you and the other groups for your continued attention and work toward the goal of managing this valuable recreational resource. I think a regular schedule of releases will be great for the paddling opportunities on the Lehigh and we look forward to taking advantage of every chance we can get to paddle the river.


March 9, 2006

Thank you for keeping us informed of the studies performed at the F.E. Walter dam. As Lehigh River paddlers, we look forward to all the scheduled 2006 whitewater releases. Please consider holding 90-95 feet to assure the availability of adequate water for the whitewater season, rather than the proposed 60-65 feet; 90-95 feet should still allow the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers plenty of access to the service road.

Whitewater releases of less than 750 cfs best serve only the upper section of river (F.E.W. to Rockport); levels less than 500 cfs tend to be dangerous to rafters & paddlers alike. Please do not disappoint us again this year. We stay the weekends in Jim Thorpe, only when the water is running. Please help to let us paddle the Lehigh & visit Jim Thorpe more in 2006 than we did in 2005. Thank you.


March 8, 2006

As a Lehigh River paddler I look forward to all the 2006 whitewater releases happening as scheduled. Please consider holding 90-95 feet to assure that adequate water for the whitewater season exists, rather than the proposed 60-65 feet. Whitewater releases of less than 750cfs best serve only one section of river. Please do not disappoint us again this year. As for safety, there are a number of rivers (Yough, Gauley, Cheat, Tohickon) that have a higher class of difficulty than the Lehigh at an 800 release level, but they are not in our back yard. The Lehigh at 800 has from class III down to class I, paddlers can choose an area according to their skill level. I plan on paddling the Lehigh many times this year and will be spending money on gas and food in the area while there. I would like the Corp the meet with the Lehigh stakeholders four times a year to further cooperation and communications.


March 8, 2006

As a Lehigh River paddler I look forward to all the 2006 whitewater releases happening as scheduled.  Please consider holding 90-95 feet to assure that adequate water for the whitewater season exists, rather than the proposed 60-65 feet.  Whitewater releases of less than 750cfs best serve only one section of river.  Please do not disappoint us again this year. I plan on paddling the Lehigh many times this year and will be spending money on gas and food in the area while there. I would like the Corp the meet with the Lehigh stakeholders four times a year to further cooperation and communications. 


March 8, 2006

Last February 17 you kindly spoke with me at the Split Rock Lodge meeting about the 2006 Lehigh plan.  I represent the private boating community and the Lehigh Valley Canoe Club. 

While we are excited about the improvements in the 2006 plan we are concerned that again this year releases will be canceled, Sundays on the Lehigh seem especially in jeopardy. 

Seems 60 to 65 feet of pool is 85 million cubic feet of water and one release day uses 35 million cf so after two days there isn't much left, and in a drier year?  Also releases of less than 750 cfs unfairly benefit users of one section (Upper) of the river, 500 cfs releases on section two (Gorge) is not adequate. 

Finally we would like to meet with all the Lehigh stakeholders and the Lehigh working group four times a year to foster cooperation and communication.

Thank you for your attention and cooperation,


February 27, 2006

I'm a padder (canoe and kayak) and live in the Philadelphia area. I've been paddling the Lehigh River for 30 years. Last summer I made a lot of plans to visit the White Haven/Hazelton area to stay for the weekend and paddle the Lehigh. Because many of the releases were canceled and the releases that happened were dropped to 500/600 cfs it became too low to paddle so I canceled my plans and took my weekend vacations in other parts of the northeast.

I am hoping there will be more releases on the Lehigh this summer of at least 800 to 1000 cfs, not cutting the flow at noon so I can plan to visit the area more frequently and stay for the weekend. I also belong to a few paddling clubs, teach kayaking & canoeing, and bring a group with me when I travel. We all add to the economy in the Lehigh area because our interests begin to spread from the river to other interests like camping, biking and hiking. We need lodging, meals and shop at local stores.


March 2, 2006

It is with great interest that I have followed the reports of the proposed releases from the FE Walter Dam for 2006.

Although the plan is an improvement from past years.  We believe that it would be in the best interest of the stakeholders to maintain a pool level of 90 feet and offer both Saturday and Sunday releases of 750 cfs.

We would also like to see an improvement in the personal sanitary disposal conditions at the access areas.  I would especially like to see at least one more "potty" station at White Haven, preferably down by the water.  That area is easily accessible to the trucks that remove the waste and it would present a much healthier option for both paddlers and for the river.

We would also encourage you to host four meetings a year  with the stakeholders (DCNR, PA Fish and Boat, Lehigh River Working Group, etc.) to continue to improve the quality of the Lehigh River, its' releases and its' environment!

The Lehigh Valley Canoe Club looks forward to a continuing dialog and to improvements to the current plan!


February 26, 2006

First I want to thank you and your office for the efforts you have made in recent years to provide the best use of our resource. I have closely watched the water levels of the FEW and Lehigh river since 1980 and have been impressed on many occasions with the protection the FEW Dam has provided. I am confident that property and lives have been saved because of the project.

I read the latest statements and am still encouraged by what I see. If I may add my own insight, as a private boater, experienced river guide, certified kayak instructor (expired), and former Navy Rescue Swimmer, I am intimately familiar with water on the other end of the valve.
I have one disagreement with the proposal.

-Release weekends in May to have a MAXIMUM release of 1,000 cfs. I do not think this is a good idea. 1,000 is minimally a good release. 2,000 is much better. There are times when we get extra rainfall between April and May, which makes for excellent whitewater. Most boaters look forward to the added flow. Understandably you must be concerned with safety. But I can assure you that at these water levels the more rocks that are covered, the safer the river is for navigation. Of course when the level gets
excessively high large hydraulics and trees become factors. When rainfall
is excessive it does not matter to a boater how low the release is, because there is plenty of natural flow on the Lower gorge to provide sufficient excitement. My concern is such, that if inflow were to be at 2500 and the release was held back to 1,000 this would be a huge disappointment. Granted not catastrophic just a disappointment, where boaters would believe, that you still aren't fully understanding our desires.

Simply put... if inflow is above 1,000 on a scheduled release weekend, please spare the extra water.

Thank you for your continued co-operation with the boating public


February 25, 2006 7:30 PM

Thanks for your efforts in expanding the enjoyment of whitewater. The releases provide a lot of pleasure to all who enjoy this sport as well as increased business to surrounding communities.

I'm always surprised at how far people travel to come to the Lehigh.



February 24, 2006

One idea that I don't recall being discussed at the Galleria meeting or included in any of the handouts relates to the possibility of needing to implement a reduced (6-hour) whitewater boating release on a Saturday.

This would have relevance only before July 1, since thereafter, even the lowest rule curve assures a 12-hour event on each designated Saturday (by borrowing from Sunday's augmentation, if needed, to pull it off). However, I can foresee a circumstance late in June, for example, while the five-foot restriction is still in effect, when there might be insufficient remaining water (above 1360 pool elevation) to accomplish even a 12-hour Saturday release at 500 cfs, even after canceling the Sunday release. If this were the case, I assume USACE would consider "saving" the Saturday event by reducing the discharge to 6 hours.

However, as I said, I haven't seen or heard any consideration of this possibility, and I would encourage the parties to the agreement to include such a provision now, so that if this kind of situation arises later, we aren't left in a bind simply because it wasn't stated in the plan.

As always, thanks for all your work on this.


February 23, 2006 4:22 PM

I wanted to thank you both for your continued support of whitewater releases on the Lehigh.  The proposed release schedule looks wonderful.  My family and I are looking forward to paddling on the Lehigh this summer and greatly appreciate the efforts that you and your group have put forth in making it feasible.  Hopefully, we'll get a tad more rain this summer than we did last summer.  You can hardly release water when you don't get enough rain to increase the level in the dam. 


February 23, 2006

I greatly appreciate the fact that the US Army Corp of Engineeers is considering increasing the number of days for whitewater releases and increasing flow during each release above 500 cfs. This is exceptional beautiful area of eastern PA that many whitewater paddlers will enjoy. The few times that I have paddled this river the flow has been between 1500 and 2000 cfs. Those levels made for an enjoyable run well within the skill level of most paddlers.


February 23, 2006

What great news!

More releases in 2006 means more time with my son paddling on the river. Please continue to also work with the fisherman since releasing colder water from the bottom of the Francis E. Walter Dam will help to increase the fish population. As boaters who co-exist with anglers, we have always moved away from a fisherman standing in the river, even if it meant foregoing a "hole" we wished to play in.

Keep up the good work!


February 23, 2006

Dear Mr. Brokke,

It is with great pleasure that I write to congratulate you for your role in helping increase the weekend water releases on the Lehigh River this summer.

My family has been on the River for the past 40 years and we have brought numerous groups and participated with various clubs on its beautiful water.
I appreciate how complicated managing the water for the region must be and sincerely thank you for giving recreational boaters the water needed to use the River during summer weekends.

Thank you on behalf of all the boaters who will enjoy the River this summer.


February 22, 2006

As an avid kayaker and regular user of the Lehigh river gorge I wish to thank you and the ACE for your efforts to insure regular water releases. I was very pleased to learn that the ACE had raised the summer pool storage level. I hope that this will allow for more successful releases in 2006 than in 2005.


February 22, 2006

Thanks for all your labors in providing more frequent releases on the Lehigh.  I look forward to more paddling (kayaker) and maybe even some fishing, this season.  Again, thanks.


February 20, 2006

First let me start by saying "Thank You".  At the end of 2006 season, everyone concerned will agree, that with a combined effort from all parties "WE" were able to make a change.  I feel that everyone will see that the Lehigh River once again will make a major economic impact to the region.  By having a continual release schedule people can plan there weekend activities around these release dates.

That being said I would like to talk about the release levels.  During the presentation at the meeting last week when the schedule was unveiled, it was projected that the releases would be between 750cfs and 1000cfs.  From a guide, for a commercial rafting outfitters, perspective this level is adequate for us to get our trips down the river without much difficulty.
However, from a Private Boater stand point this level is a good level to run the Lehigh but not at its optimal level.  At 2000cfs the Lehigh starts to shine. The features that bring boaters out to run the Lehigh become pronounced and will make boaters want to come back again and again.  I know this level may seem intimidating to the novice paddlers, however, the Lehigh is one of the few rivers that offers the novice paddlers a way around ANY feature they DO NOT WANT TO RUN!!!. 

Being a paddler, I travel great distances each year to go play on rivers across the nation.   I have participated in a number of surveys and studies at other rivers.  These surveys were used to determine Flow Rates.  Parking comments, Services offered at a Put-In or Take-Out etc.  It may be too late this year, (maybe not) to try and have a couple of these survey conducted during a release weekend.  I for one, and I'm sure I could round up a crew, would volunteer to man the Take-Out at "Rockport" or "Glen Onoko" and talk to boaters when they depart the water. 

What I would like to see is a Release Scheduled for 1000cfs and a survey taken.  Then a scheduled release for say 1500cfs and a survey.  Then a release at 2000cfs and a survey, 2500cfs and a survey until we reach the optimal level that is ideal for all parties NOT simply ONE rafting company that runs the majority of their trips on the Upper reaches of the river.


February 20, 2006

I was very encouraged after reading the 2006 Temporary Operations Plan for FEW Dam and Reservoir.  It seems that the resulting plan was designed with a lot of thought toward the best interests of many parties.  As a member of the Lehigh Valley Canoe Club, the American Canoe Association, and American Whitewater, as well as an active paddler on the Lehigh, I am excited about the 2006 plan.  It seems that if things go well there will be a benefit for the whole watershed. in addition to plentiful opportunities to paddle.

I applaud your efforts and look forward to the continuing progress and potential benefits.


February 20, 2006

Our local canoe club just posted the proposed release schedule for 2006.  I think the idea of holding back more volume will enhance the recreational opportunities in the event of another dry summer.  As someone who grew up on the Lehigh, I'm very encouraged to see the full use of the resource the River has to offer.  I speak not just from a boating perspective, but someone who has used the watershed for other recreation, such as fishing and hunting.  It is really encouraging to see that someone has taken the steps to see that the full potential of the Lehigh be realized.  Thank you for your support of these efforts.


February 18, 2006

Thank you for working for another great year of w releases on the Lehigh! I think you did a great job last summer.....pray for rain!


February 17, 2006

I attended the public meeting for the FEW dam. I found it informative and interesting. I spoke with representatives from several agencies and groups.

My comments about the 2006 changes are that they seem sound, moving in the right direction, and I was glad to see you used public comments when making them.

In the future, I would like to see less emphasis on releases for the sake of the whitewater and more consideration for wildlife conservancy and fishing opportunities. Specifically, I would like to see the releases modified to lower volumes and more often. I also am in favor of holding the water levels as high as possible to keep water temps as cold as possible for as long as possible in to the summer months.

I will try to make comments as the year goes on with how the releases affect the fishing.

Keep up the good work.


February 16, 2006

Public comment to 2006 Flow Management Plan


February 13, 2006

I am a member of the Lehigh Valley Canoe Club and support John Schneller and Jeff Taschler's views on the issue of dam releases that enhance boater recreation on the Lehigh River.  At our last meeting we voted (no dissenting votes) to support a 90 feet pool, 750cfs or no releases (saving water for the following weekend), and more porta potties or sanitary facilities at the Whitehaven access as well as along the rails-to-trails trail.  We have a membership of approximately 600 (not all were in attendance at the meeting).


February 9, 2006

I have previously written in support of last year's proposed management plan which provides for increased whitewater releases. While I was disappointed in last summer's outcome, I hope that the lessons learned will enable all parties to enjoy the releases this year, and that we will be able to achieve the 30 releases originally proposed.

I was able to coordinate some whitewater trips on the Lehigh last season for recreational purposes with the Kayak and Canoe Club of New York, and would have done more, but for the cancellation of the releases.  I live in New Jersey , but could often combine paddling on the Lehigh with visits to family members living in Pennsylvania .  It would make a great family excursion for some of us to be paddling while others are using the bike trails, or hiking in the area.  Then we all could all regroup for dinner in local restaurants and probably find time for shopping.  Staying at local campsites with my grandchildren adds immeasurably to the experience.  I hope this will give some idea of the many ways that an extended whitewater release schedule benefits a wider community than paddlers!

Specifically, we need to have more water stored at the dam early in the year to allow adequate releases even in dry summer conditions.  Releases should be timed to allow maximum recreational opportunities, particularly on weekends, and should be at least 750 cfs, with consideration given to higher levels. 

We appreciate your efforts on behalf of the paddling community, and look forward to taking advantage of additional releases this year, with the hope that they will become a permanent fixture.


February 4, 2006

I would like to see people using the dam for fishing get a better break then last year. C ould not put a boat in without a lot of trouble and having to fish from the breast of the dam was danger for kids trying to fish, all for a few people to raft. Some people look forward to the weekend to fish the river only to find it is running high and not safe to fish. There are more people using the river to fish then raft. We also pay for the fish do boaters?


February 01, 2006

I encourage an increase in Lehigh River releases for several reasons. The obvious is that I paddle and enjoy the opportunity to get on a semi-local river when it is available. It has also become a place where I can safely take my grandson and his buddy as beginning kayakers.

    A second reason, and less selfish, is that it appears to be great for the local economy. I always get gas when I get off the NE extension, maybe pick up supplies at the strip mall right in White Haven and stop at the Ugly Mug when done for the day. Most other boaters I know also end up spending money in town. (Hopefully we all respect the local folks that we do not create a disturbance to their peaceful life style.) Many also camp near by to go boating in the morning, bringing a further increase to the economy. An increased release schedule may also help the outfitters prosper by encouraging repeat customers.

   I appreciate any consideration you give to the local boating community, it is nice if we can all work together to use our local resources.


January 31, 2006

Thanks for the opportunity to voice my opinion. I have fished the Lehigh River below the dam for many years. The two issues that are most important to me are :

1. Scheduled releases (specific dates, times and flow rate), so I can plan my trips to the river knowing beforehand what conditions I will encounter when I arrive. The biggest source of frustration for me has been when I check the website Friday afternoon for the weekend flow information, and it indicates a flow that will be acceptable for fishing. I plan a trip to the river only to find that an unscheduled release is in progress, and the fishing is poor due to the increased flow. Having a water release schedule and sticking to it, is very important so people can plan based on the conditions in the river.

2. Alternating weekend releases - release water one weekend / then no release the next weekend. This way both the boaters and the fishermen have the opportunity to share the resource. I realize that both boaters and fishermen want water levels that are favorable for their activities. By alternating weekends, both groups could plan their activities based on the release schedule.


January 30, 2006

With the addition of sustained cold water releases from FEW, the Lehigh River could offer a unique opportunity on eastern waters; a floatable river that supports a trout fishery.  This would create an angling experience not readily available to anglers on the east coast and support a local economy at the same time. 

Since the completion of the high road around FEW I can see no reason not to utilize its increased capacity.  I'm aware that the primary purpose of FEW is flood control.  But FEW is similar to the Corps' dam at Blue Marsh, which operates at a full pool during the summer months and delivers cold water discharges.  I see no reason that FEW cannot operate in a similar fashion.


January 26, 2006

As a fisherman on the Lehigh River let me commend the C of E for putting in the high road at F. Walter Dam in White Haven. One of the things that must occur now is to maintain minimal instream flows to the Lehigh River during the summer months. Particularly we need to maintain an adequate pool depth in the reservoir to insure the released water stays under 70 degrees F. I believe this is compatible with the other manangement goals for the Dam and will do much to enhance the trout fishing potential of the Lehigh River.


January 24, 2006

I am in favor of keeping a flow rate of 750-1500 on as many late spring, summer, and fall weekends as possible. Please don't dump water during weekday nights if it can be delayed to the weekend days.


January 23, 2006


I am an angler concerned about the future of the Lehigh River .  I grew up on the Chesapeake Bay in Va. and I now reside in Bethlehem .  The Lehigh river and its tributaries have allowed me to enjoy recreational activities that I grew up doing and also appreciate Pennsylvania more as a whole.  Last year I purchased a pontoon boat specifically to float and fish the Lehigh.  I have been fishing the river for several years now and the main area of concern is high water temperatures in the summer which are lethal to trout.  I would like to see the increased capacity of the dam utilized, so to maximize the flow of cold water through the warm months of summer into the fall.  I understand that anglers aren't the only people who use the river and that the rafting community has also expressed their interests.  I would like to maximize our resource within given constraints to best satisfy all participants.


January 6, 2006

First off, thank you for your support for all the recreational activities that depend upon the dam releases!

As a paddler and a PA resident, I understand the pressures on you to support all the recreational, ecological, and economic activities that rely upon the Lehigh river .  The Lehigh River Gorge is one of the nicest and prettiest pieces of water to paddle in PA and supports paddlers of all skill levels, both individuals and families; your efforts in supporting this are to be commended.

However, I would like to encourage you to consider the ways to provide more support to the river activities:

1.  Store more water specifically to support week-end releases.  The goal of 750 cfs should be the minimum goal if possible.

2.  Balance the releases to release more water on the week-ends than during the week.  It is very discouraging to watch water being released all week, then nothing or very little left for the week-end.

3.  Change the start time the week-end releases to better match the times when people will actually be on the river.  It's a long walk to drag your raft/boat/kayak thru the lower gorge at 1:00 PM because most of the water was released over the night when the park/river was closed.

These suggestions would also help in times of low water (like last summer/year) to support the river activities.

Thank you for your interest and willingness to work with the paddling community!


January 5, 2006

I am a fisherman who is very concerned about the future of my sport and the improvement of our trout fisheries for future generations.  I want to encourage you to seek a solution to the Lehigh River release question that will be beneficial to the interests of both the boating enthusiasts and the fisherman.  Other fishermen have provided specifics on a strategy that will allow both to enjoy their respective sports.  This will require some compromise and a respect for the interests of all interested parties.  Please do your best to provide a fair and balanced plan for the future of this valuable natural resource.


January 2, 2006

I'm an angler who fishes the Lehigh from the Toby on down to Mud Run and below, and am aware of proposals to increase water levels at FEW to help the trout and the rafters. If this can be done safely -- without interfering with your duty to control floods -- I'm all for it. The Lehigh is an untapped state resource: it has a naturally high amount of insect life, and could with cooler, higher flows sustain a healthy trout population that would make the Lehigh a destination fishery, especially for fly fishers like myself. As a frequent boater/user of the reservoir itself, I'd add that the new road across the dam makes it feasible to keep the lower road inundated. Just my two cents.

December 27, 2005

I was reading a post and thread from Fly Fishing Magazine this evening.  It indicated that it would be useful to comment of proposed flows for 2006 below the Francis E. Walter dam.

I am a very avid trout fly fisherman.  I spend many days/weekend on the upper Delaware River water shed during each year.    What draws me to the Upper Delaware is the quality of the fishery (the scenery is not bad either).   I spend between 30 and 50 days per year fishing the Upper Delaware system.

I only very occasionally fish the Lehigh River below the dam, usually near the area of Hayes Creek inflow to the river.  I am fairly familiar to the river from just below the dam  down through White Haven and all the way down to Just upstream of Jim Thorpe.  It's a gorgeous river, with tremendous scenery and tremendous "potential".  

As an avid trout fisherman I am very keen to watch and monitor the water temperature and flow levels, but especially the temperature.  The USGS site gives a very good indication of what is unfolding on a real time basis.

Cleary, the water temperature over the summer season on the Lehigh River through the gorge (below the dam) is a major disappointment.  It may start out in early June averaging below 70 degrees, but by early or mid July, there are many days way over 72 and many over 74-75, a range that is borderline lethal to trout.  This situation only gets worse in August thru the 1 st week or two of September.  There just is clearly not enough cold water out flow from the dam  (i.e. depth of water to produce cold water of 55-60 degrees or less).

I always check the USGGS site rite below the dam.  And it only gets warmer as one goes down stream in late summer.


December 26, 2005

Please consider a constant release of water from Francis Walter.  I know that many weekend releases had to be canceled do to low water levels last year. I think, however, with careful planning and a more normal Summer, water releases on a constant basis can be achieved.  I am not referring to a simple release on a weekend but a constant release which would benefit a cold water fishery.  I truly believe with a more constant flow that a world class Trout fishery could be maintained.


December 24, 2005

When you determine your water release schedules please keep the needs of the trout fisherman in mind. Our needs differ from those of boaters.


December 23, 2005

Thank you for the opportunity to discuss managing water flows from the Francis E Walter dam for 2006.

I would hope that you would consider 3 points.

1. Releasing sufficient "cold water" in the warmer months to maintain a trout population for a good distance downstream.

2. Keeping the water level at "a good" minimum throughout the summer.

3. Restricting "heavy" releases to several weekends a year (for the "rafters"), perhaps every other weekend in July and August.


December 23, 2005

I just want to say that we really appreciate the increased number of recreational releases this past year. I as well as others would love to see more in the 2006 season.


December 23, 2005

Last summer, here in the East saw some of the highest water temperatures which proved extremely stressful to trout in the Lehigh and other fisheries. Maintaining a constant, cool temperature is important to the health of this important resource. I urge the Army Corp of Engineers to maintain a more reasonable flow from the dam during stressful periods to improve the water quality, which in turn will protect this fishery.


December 23, 2005

I would like to provide the following comment in regards to the Frances E Walter Flow Management Plan for 2006.

I urge the Army Corps of Engineers to consider all users of the Lehigh River when finalizing their storage and release plan for 2006.  Of course, some of these users are the wild trout that live in the Lehigh River and are dependent on releases of cold water throughout the summer months.  With last year's plan there was too much cold water released in the spring when the trout did not need it.  By summer, the cold water was gone.  We need a consistent conservation release for the summer months.

I understand the need to balance the plan to benefit all users and I'm certain such a plan can be accomplished through compromise.  Please consider the health of the entire river ecosystem when finalizing the plan for 2006.


December 23, 2005

It's time to realize that there are more uses for the Lehigh River than kayaking.  The river has been "monopolized" far too many years by rafters.  There are thousands of vacationers who come to this part of the Poconos, and it is very disappointing when they try to fish the Lehigh only to hit another white water release.  These vacationers, many of who are fishermen and women, spend a lot of money in their week's time here, but many are leaving here feeling like they missed a good time by not being able to use the Lehigh River .   The Fly Fishing industry has grown in leaps and bounds and now this area has become a prime target for weekend or week long fishing excursions.  Millions of dollars are spent each year in this sport and it is great to see that this area can now benefit by having a lot of this money spent right here.  I, like the majority of fishermen, am not greedy.  F.E. Walter Dam can hold more water and provide a colder release for the fishing sport, but it just isn't necessary to have water releases in the area of 750 to 1000CFS.  A lesser release should be maintained so that EVERYONE can enjoy the benefits of this water.

    I want to be fair to all, but the comment made by a rafter official last summer which stated that "fishermen can use the river all week long" shows where the real unfairness lies. Why not let the rafters use the river during the week and let the fishermen use it on the weekend??  I don't believe that would be fair either, and just want to see a lesser water release so that no one is turned away from using the river, except under normal high water conditions. Boating at 400 to 500 is certainly doable and fair.


December 22, 2005

I'm writing to express my interest in having the flow of the Lehigh River managed for a trout fishery.  Please support the PA Trout position asking for habitat friendly flows that will improve the trout habitat in the Lehigh River .  With a regular controlled release plan everyone has the potential to enjoy the benefits of this exceptional watershed.


December 22, 2005

I'm writing to express my interest in having the flow of the Lehigh River managed for a trout fishery. Cold water is a must during the summer months. High temperatures thermally stress trout. Increased flows during these times would significantly enhance fish survivability. With a regular controlled supply of coldwater flow, the Lehigh River has a lot of potential as a wild trout stream. Please consider the fly fisherman in your flow plan.


December 21, 2005

I too believe that the fishermen and boaters can co-exist. By limiting the release levels to between 750 and 1000CFS during peak periods, on weekends only, June-August, water can be conserved for mid-day minimum flow releases to sustain a viable trout fishery during thermal stress periods. 

If the flow regimen were modeled to merely sustain a viable wild trout fishery (300-400CFS for a few hours each afternoon when the air temps reach 85 degrees) there would be plenty of water left over for the rafters on weekends at the flows listed above. It seems the rafters do not like the 1000+CFS releases either. Therefore it is wasteful for both forms of recreation.

I would be curious how this "model" would play out based on the previous ten years of releases. Would there have been enough water?


December 20, 2005

I am a frequent fisher of the Lehigh River . I am contacting you to urge your support to take actions necessary to ensure the proper dam/release levels that will make the Lehigh River both rafter/boater friendly AND trout habitat friendly. The river is already a much-desired destination for rafters, but with planned flows it would also be a world-class trout fishery. There are others more knowledgeable than myself whom are supporting the plan to provide consistent flows, so I will only make this one point: the economic value to the area and state would be a boom! Please make this river the "All That It Can Be!"


December 20, 2005

I would like to voice my support for PATU in the matter of increased flows of coldwater from the Francis E. Walter Dam.  Eighteen years ago I fished the Lehigh on the opening day of trout season.  It was my first experience fishing in a river, and it began my addiction to trout fishing.  This river has the potential to rival the West Branch with a few changes and I support those changes. 


December 19, 2005

I would like to add my support to the Lehigh Coldwater Fishery Alliance's mission "to obtain a consistent release of coldwater (55 Deg F) from the Francis E Walter Reservoir (FEW) through better utilization of FEW's storage capacity and discharge options, in an effort to improve overall flows, protect habitat and enhance the Lehigh River's wild trout fishery."  My wife and I are avid flyfishers, about an hour's drive from the Lehigh, and we currently fish the river maybe a couple of times a year.  If it were made into a top rate wild trout fishery, we would be spending many weekends there, and I'm sure the same would be true of many fishermen in the northeast, as well as visitors from other parts of the country.  The potential benefits in terms of recreation opportunities for the public and boost to the local economy are significant, from both the fishing and the rafting opportunities.  I wish you success in this endeavor, and thank you for the effort to make it happen.


December 18, 2005

The balance between optimizing the trout fishery while providing sufficient flows for whitewater enthusiasts can be achieved. I believe that it requires changes in storage and releases to accommodate both. First, the basin at the dam must be full to capacity to allow sufficient water releases over the season, meaning Winter and Spring capture in the basin must be optimal. The best scenario for achieving the goals of both fishing and boating enthusiasts will require compromises from both interests. In order to extend the viability of trout in the river, releases should not occur before Memorial Day. Spring has elevated natural flow events due to higher average precipitation up to May 31, and boaters should view the natural enhanced flow by rainfall as an opportunistic event.  Anglers will be discouraged during natural high water events, as access to fish will be severely compromised.

During summer months (June thru August, most years), trout are thermally stressed when ambient air temperatures exceed 87 degrees (which will push water temps at or around 77 degrees, stressful but not lethal to trout). An optimal flow regimen for trout would be releases from 11AM to 3 or 4 PM on any day when the air temperature exceeds 87. Whether there is enough water to enhance fish survivability and provide weekend releases for boaters is a question that could only be answered by data modeling.

Boaters seem to desire weekend releases. Higher releases over all 13 weekends in the summer period may be more desirable than spreading those over a five month period (May to October), in that whitewater companies cater to a great number of floaters during this vacation period. It is also the period where most of the thermal stress will occur (June-August). If water is not available for both high temperature days, and weekend boating periods, the weekend releases may be enough to increase (but not optimize) trout viability over the summer period. After Labor day, both anglers and boating enthusiasts should be willing to succumb to the vagaries of nature to fulfill their desired interests.

I believe the above regimen will satisfy all parties concerned, and will greatly appreciate the economic value of the Lehigh watershed via the Corps water releases. Thank you for allowing me to comment.


December 18, 2005

I would like to have a more habitat friendly flow for the 2006 plan.


December 18, 2005

I recognize that satisfying the needs and desires of a diverse group of users is difficult, but I wanted to add my support for managing the releases of water to the Lehigh River in a way that protects the habitat of cold water fishes, particularly trout.  Fly fishing in particular and fishing in general is part of our heritage in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania .  Larger rivers with quality trout habitat are few and far between.  We should try to take advantage of opportunities to enhance such resources.  Please give proper consideration to trout habitat when designing the water release plan for 2006. 


November 22, 2005

I am fortunate to live near the Francis Walter Dam. It is a beautiful area that many people enjoy. With the new road now being open across the top of the dam, the area is becoming more and more popular for hikers, site seers, and other people that enjoy the outdoors.

With all good things, however, there is often a downside. In general,

traffic on the new road travels at speeds much greater than the posted limit. The road is also becoming more and more popular for motorcycle and car racing. On weekends, groups of riders on sport motorcycles race and up and down the road almost constantly. Two weeks ago, several cars were actually drag racing using both lanes. The black streaks on the pavement are still there. It is only a matter of time before someone gets into an accident or hits a pedestrian or pet. The new road also allows easy access for illegal dumpers and underage partiers. It is difficult to take down license plate numbers, and there is very little, if any, police presence. Bear Creek Township does not have a force and the state police barracks for this area is in the town of Wyoming , approximately 18 or so miles away.

All of us who live in this area would like to see a greater police presence. Having said that, we also realize that this may not be possible. We therefore recommend a simple and relatively inexpensive solution for a great deal of these problems - speed bumps. Two or three of these on the access road and two or three more across the top of the dam would pretty much eliminate speeding. Is this something that the Army Corps would consider?

I also want to say that your staff at the Francis Walter Dam does a great job of keeping up the facilities. All of us who live out there very much appreciate their good work. I know that they do their best to keep up on any illegal activities.


November 23, 2005

Please schedule more Lehigh releases on the weekends for 2006. Few things are more frustrating for paddlers than to see the Corps release water during the week and nothing on weekends. Dam releases stimulate the local economy and that of the larger community. Residents from NY, NJ, PA, DE, etc. have the pleasure of enjoying the river and what's available on its banks (bike and hike trails, restaurants, etc.). It seems to be only common-sense and as a taxpayer of PA, I expect something like this!


November 18, 2005

First, thanks so much for everything the Corps has been doing to help whitewater enthusiasts that enjoy the Lehigh River. I am not only an avid whitewater kayaker, but I also work as a river guide for Whitewater Challenger.

I look forward to all the advances I hear coming for the Lehigh River Whitewater Releases for next season, and wanted to voice my opinion as well.

First, I'll take anything you guys can do. A day on the whitewater sections of the Lehigh is much better than not paddling at all, or paddling the flat-water section. So with that in mind, I support anything that would accomplish this goal.

Although I have my own opinions on the flows for these scheduled releases. The rafting companies are happy to get 750cfs releases, as a public boater, that is marginal at best. To me, the best level on the Lehigh is 2500cfs. It actually doesn't really get exciting for regular boaters like me until the flows reach over 1000 to 1500 cfs.

Again, let me stress, that if I'd have a choice I'd take 750 over nothing, but in my perfect world, I would enjoy seeing many different flow levels on the river. Maybe make most releases 750 cfs, but then throw out higher releases too, make a scheduled 2500 release!

There are many rivers out there that vary their release levels. Different weekends with different levels. Make it fun for everyone, even the experienced boaters that think 750 cfs is a minimum level.

Keep up the good work. Looking forward to next year's whitewater season!


November 15, 2005

This was my first year paddling the Lehigh and I was impressed with the schedule. Many other boaters were extremely pleased with all of the scheduled releases. Thank you very much for collecting the water last spring and releasing so much on the schedlued weekends.
I would like to see more water collected earlier in the year next spring so in the event of another dry summer we have enough water to maintain releases throughout the summer. Collecting more water would virtually guarantee a longer whitewater season. I don't know how possible these objectives are but I just thought I would let someone know what I think as an avid whitewater paddler.


November 10, 2005

I wouldn't make extending the season a priority.  I jus t thought since there were 4 or 5 extra feet during the week that there might be enough for a small release.

The season is as long as the water levels and air temps permit.  There is an inverse relationship between the two, i.e the colder it gets, the more water is needed to motivate one to paddle.  I might paddle 6 00 or 700 in August, but I wouldn't bother at that level in December.  Anything 40 degrees or higher will keep most paddlers on the water.


November 4, 2005

I am writing to ask for your support to continue water conservation at the Francis Walter Dam to aid in predictable weekend release schedules . This program will have a significant effect on the rafting, and kayaking communities that frequent the Lehigh Valley Gorge.   It is certain to have significant economic value to the businesses that service these customers.  Tourism will increase once the general public becomes aware that there is a reliable natural resource during the seasons when most of us travel, and clearly that is late spring and summer.  (i.e.:  Youghogheny State Park and River Control Program)  Services marketing will be the resposibility of everyone that will benefit from this project, but I believe that this is a fantastic opportunity to promote the our river, its history, our communities, and economic growth.  Natural resources such as our river system is not common, but we need your help to make this opportunity a reality for everyone!


November 3, 2005

Kudos to all who attended the recent workshop meeting at Pocono Ramada Hotel, including representatives of the Corps of Engineers, DCNR, DRBC, Fish & Boat Commission, DEP, and countless boating and fishing groups. What a productive, forward-looking, thoughtful discussion! We were honored to be a part of it.

I am about to attend the annual conference of America Outdoors -- the national association of land and water based outfitters who represent the interests of outdoor enthusiasts as diverse as hunters, anglers, boaters, backpackers and hikers, to name just a few. In my 31 year career in recreation and tourism, and my 20+ year affiliation with America Outdoors, I've rarely seen the kind of cooperative spirit and dedicated effort that's being invested here to improve recreational opportunities at the Lehigh River. The collective wisdom and experience of those who attended last week's workshop will doubtless prove to be an invaluable resource in shaping the 2006 water flow program for Francis Walter Dam.

I wholeheartedly support what seemed to be the general consensus of the meeting's attendees ... namely, that next year, more water be collected in the spring; that it be collected earlier; that it be conserved through shortened release hours on whitewater weekends; that reduced flow targets be implemented when water reserves fall below certain pre-defined thresholds; and that pool elevation restrictions in support of the in-lake spawn during May and June be defined as a secondary priority to be pursued in a manner not to jeopardize successful implementation of downstream objectives.

Again, thanks to everyone for a lot of hard work and thoughtful discussion.
We look forward to great things in 2006!


November 1, 2005

You see, in my opinion, the release those days was way too high (1,500cfs) and I thought of it being equal to someone being very thirsty, requesting a drink of water, and then having a whole glass of water poured into ones face.   I've read on a message board that a few adept paddlers had the whole river to themselves.  All the play features are eliminated at that level and for the outside temperatures in the low 50’s in October it's not a good time to swim which is another deterrent to paddling at that level.  If you release that amount of water on a hot summer day it would be wonderful, even higher would be good or 750cfs as ideal anytime.
Thank you for all you're doing, I'm looking forward to many wonderful days on the Lehigh.


November 1, 2005

I am an avid Whitewater rafting, kayaking and fishing enthusiast and I had a great time running the Lehigh gorge last 4 th of July weekend. Your summer release idea is great! I know it was a tough year for water as we cancelled our plans to come back and do it again in September. I know that fishing and whitewater interests may be in conflict, but having more summer releases on a whitewater resource like the Lehigh gorge is a rare treat.


October 31, 2005

Can you tell me when the access road gate to the Francis Walter Dam outlet to the Lehigh River will be closed for the winter? I am a trout fisherman and hoped the road won't be closed until the end of November, but a friend of mine told me the gate was being closed today. This is the gate to the right before the dam that leads down to the Lehigh River.


October 31, 2005

As a paddler who enjoys kayaking with my friends on the Lehigh River , I just want to say that we really appreciate the increased number of recreational releases this year. We understand the need to cut back the releases when rainfall is scarce, but we do want to encourage you to keep releasing on weekends as much as you can.

Releases of 750 CFS or higher are particularly welcomed by those who want to paddle during the summer months.


October 26, 2005

Reaching a balance between the different water users is by no means a small undertaking.  I commend you for this undertaking.  Regardless of the special interest groups represented here the reality of the situation is this.  Whether it be rafter, fisherman or sightseer there is one common thread.  That thread is the open spaces; wildlife and nature attract the tourists.  I have fished the river for nearly 35 years and have learned that sharing the bounties of its resources is paramount.  One thing that is certain is that river levels have never been managed in support of the fishery, nature or science.  I spend on average 20 man-days per year fishing the river and drive over 2 hours per trip to do this.  I would hope and encourage that the Corps of Engineers places the survival and betterment of the fishery as its top priority.  Secondly I would hope that the farmer not be forgotten and water uses for the local governments be given second priority.  With the rate at which the Poconos are growing I think it a matter of time before the resources of the river will be looked in a different light.  Personally, I believe a trophy wild fishery would provide a greater impact to the economy.  Tourism especially the family type is not based solely on whitewater rafting trips.

Remember betting living through science.


October 26, 2005

I am a canoeist and member of the 300+ member Monocacy Canoe Club based in Frederick , Maryland .  I have been paddling the Lehigh Gorge regularly for the last 12-13 years, including leading trips there in each of the last six years.  I support your efforts to increase the number of whitewater releases in the 750-1000 cfs range.  Although the summer rainfall was inadequate to permit complete execution of the plan in 2005, it should be attempted again in 2006.  Thank you for the efforts.


October 26, 2005

After reading the many posts on this website it seems anglers and kayakers want the same thing: More water. Storing more water will create colder water temperatures at the bottom of the dam making summer releases healthier for fish. More water means more recreational opportunities and creates a better employment situation for locals who cater to both anglers and tourists.

Releases should raise the river above the 1000 CFS which makes it safer for kayaking, rafting, and provides an oxygen rich environment for fish.


October 26, 200

I very much appreciate all the effort you and the folks at the Army Corps are putting into making me a happy paddler!  Thank you for all the communications!  Thank you for thinking of us and releasing the water so that we can enjoy spectacular weekends!


October 25, 2005

As a regular user of the Lehigh River below the Walter Dam I would like to let you know how enthusiastic the response was to this year's more frequent releases. We are thrilled to be able to paddle the Lehigh all summer. The level of commerce in Jim Thorpe was higher than ever and I believe this move benefited everyone.

Please continue this policy forever of addition releases forever....


October 25, 2005

First, thanks for your emails about releases. My friends and I had a beautiful river experience at 1550cfs a week ago.

We appreciate getting releases on weekends both Saturday and Sunday, from May through October whenever possible. Flow rates of 750-1750 are perfect for us.

Please try to avoid dumping water on weekdays and weekday evenings, and save it for the weekends.


October25, 2005

Thank you for seeking input upon setting up the 2006 release schedule.  I & my friends are avid boaters. (NY, No. Jersey AMC).  We have always enjoyed the releases on the Lehigh River & certainly hope that they will continue.  As part of an outdoor club with a strong emphasis on conservation & safety, we understood the difficulties this very dry summer presented.

It is our hope that a release schedule similar to last year's will be set up, (running only with the proviso that you have enough water to do so).  Any chance there could be some slightly higher release levels, i.e. 1000, or 1500?  (Again, taking into consideration the amount of water you have at the designated time.)   We paddle canoes & kayaks; the slightly higher levels make the river that much more enjoyable!   This would be quite attractive to boaters & would definitely draw them to the area.

We run instructionals on the Lehigh when possible.  Safety is a top priority with AMC boaters.  All paddlers running the river with us have participated in Safety & Rescue courses. They also have been rated by their river running peers as having shown that they can safely & capably run this Class II river. 

Thank you for any and all efforts on our behalf.


October 25, 2005

First off let me praise the efforts of all the agencies involved in manipulating the flow to try to appease everyone. "You can please some of the people some of the time but you can not please all of the people all of the time". Army Corps, PFBC, DCNR, Wildlands Conservancy my hat's off to you for your effort on the compromises. There are a lot of special interest groups involved with a lot of money at stake for everyone. We truly have a wonderful resource at our disposal being the dam and its tailwaters. Getting the pool level permanently altered will take an act of Congress; it won't be easy but can be accomplished. Changing the pool level temporarily will give the added data for future studies and this can be done without violating the flood control primary goal and also achieving the secondary goal of recreation. Keep listening, be fair and come up with a reasonable goal for all parties involved.  You are well on your way to establishing a schedule to benefit everyone. Mistakes will be made, agendas will be altered, especially at Mother Nature's hand, but in the long run the interest of everyone can be addressed. Come up with a flow to help the wildlife, insect life, the fisherman, the rafting community. You can do it!! Don't let the grumbles of some or the naysayers put a chip on your shoulders. Take the good let the rest go, move on make informed decisions. After attending some of the meetings I am impressed with the knowledge pool from which you have to draw your conclusions as well as implement the future releases. You have intelligent well versed individuals in your ranks use them. Keep up the good work.


October 24, 2005

I appreciate your info updates throughout the paddling season and also the work and effort put in by so many to have increased releases for 2005, although the lack of rain caused so many to be cancelled.

For 2006 I suggest that impoundment levels be planned higher and water collected earlier. Also I believe it would be prudent and beneficial to have timed releases so water is not drawn down as much creating fewer cancellations. Water should be available at Rockport for 8AM launches through 4PM Saturdays and until noon on Sundays. I also would like to have an occasional (2 OR 3) three day releases including Fridays added to the scheduled releases. Paddling and fishing are much more enjoyable with fewer or no rafters.

If I can be of any help, please let me know.


October 21, 2005

I'm writing to advocate for more releases on the Lehigh.  Actually, the same amount of releases for 2006 as posted this year would be a good compromise, it's just a shame that they didn't actually happen this year.  We understand that water is contingent on rain, but don't promise rafting companies releases that they advertise for and then let the customers and rafting companies down.  Although I absolutely advocate for more releases, I'd rather have realistic releases than anything.  If the dam thinks that they can only realistically promise 4 releases a year, then the public can only be happy with reality; however, if the dam promises 10 and produces only 4, then people have a right to be annoyed.


October 21, 2005

It occurs to us that when 2006 rolls around, after investing a lot of time and effort trying to anticipate every conceivable flow circumstance, and developing release criteria that will hopefully achieve the desired results under all conceivable weather and water conditions, inevitably there will arise situations that were unforeseen, or for which the defined plan/formula produces an undesirable or unintended result.

For this reason, we really strongly recommend that in its final draft, "the plan" include a statement similar to the following:

"The COE shall implement the provisions of this plan with the understanding that some judgment may be required in extraordinary or unforeseen circumstances. COE retains the authority to apply discretion in such circumstances 'for the good of the program' so long as such discretion is deemed consistent with the stated goals and priorities of the plan."

COE already retains discretion to address flood and drought issues; this would merely enable short-term anomalies within the "boundaries" of the plan to be addressed without a crisis reconvening of a multi-agency task force, or an allegation that "the plan" has been inappropriately abandoned.


October 21, 2005

Thank you for all the additional releases.  However, it seems that the corps is unaware that releases of 1000-1700 are actually safer than lower releases.  There are less hazards and rocks to content with.  And there are far less moves that rafts need to make.  It seems a shame that when water comes, the corps is still releasing a good deal out of Tuesdays when it could be saved for a higher, safer release on weekends.


October 20, 2005

Comments Concerning the 2005 & 2006 F. E. Walter Flow Management Plans

I would first like to thank DCNR, ACE, PA F&BC, and the Wildlands Conservancy for your efforts in developing and implementing the 2005 F. E. Walter Flow Management Plan. If it wasn't for the efforts of the group, the downstream fishery water quality releases would have been much lower earlier in the year, and several more whitewater releases would have been cancelled.

Unfortunately, all three of the main objectives of the 2005 FEW Flow Management Plan were compromised including, fish spawning at FEW, the minimum downstream fishery flows of 250 cfs, and 10 of the recreational whitewater releases were cancelled, six were modified to lower flows, and only six releases were held as scheduled. On a positive note, the 2005 FEW Flow Management Plan has allowed us to learn early on that there are several major changes that need to be made if any future FEW Flow Management Plans are to be more successful.

In my opinion, there were two main stumbling blocks with the 2005 FEW Plan:

1) The five foot pool fluctuation restriction during the entire two months of May and June- six of the eight 2005 whitewater releases in May and June were modified as a result of the five foot pool fluctuation restriction, and at least one would have been cancelled completely if the 2005 plan would not have been modified. Additionally, downstream fishery water quality releases were also modified as early as the beginning of June as a result of the restriction, which resulted in flows well below the minimum 250 cfs.

My suggestion for future plans: Rather then focusing on fish spawning and jeopardizing the millions of dollars in economic benefit to the entire Pocono Region from downstream fishing and whitewater boating, stock the desired fish at FEW and remove the five foot fluctuation restriction. If the working group cannot agree to remove fish spawning from future FEW Plans, I would like to suggest that the three main objectives be prioritized according to which are the most economically beneficial. Then, when necessary, the most beneficial objectives should be given priority.

2) Not enough water was stored- Of the 22 scheduled whitewater releases, ten were cancelled, six were modified, and only six were held as scheduled. Additionally, approximately 80% of the water quality releases were either modified or cancelled.

My suggestion for future plans: Build a new boat launch at FEW that would allow easy access to the slack water behind the dam at every water level, impound enough water to insure reliable flows that would guarantee releases for downstream recreation and water quality releases in even the driest years (like 2005), impound the necessary water earlier in the year, and when it is necessary to conserve water- reduce the volume of water released for water quality flows and shorten the length of the whitewater releases. Shortening whitewater releases can easily be done by adjusting the gate on a daily basis. Example: increase the flow on Friday evening at 10 PM, decrease the flow on Saturday afternoon at 1 PM, increase the flow again on Saturday evening at 10 PM, and decrease the flow again on Sunday afternoon. This would save 15 hours of water compared to the traditional whitewater releases that last from Friday at 4 PM until Sunday at 1 PM. Additionally, the fishermen could fish the river on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings, every weekend.

I would like to further comment on three issues that were brought up at the Stakeholders meeting on October 20th 2005, that relate to future FEW Flow Management Plans:

- First, a representative from the ACOE quoted that in order for the 2005 FEW Flow Management Plan to have been 100% successful, the pool level would have had to be 1393.00 by May 13th. I would like to suggest that the 2006 plan includes a pool level of 1393.00 (approx. 1/3 of the FEW Dam capacity) and since the time required to store the water could take 10 weeks or longer, that the storage process begins no later then March 1st.

- Second, there was talk of increasing the minimum flow from 250 cfs to 300 cfs. I am opposed to this idea because of the increased amount of water that would be necessary for the increase. Although an increase of 50 cfs seems minimal, it is very substantial over an extended period of time. If my calculations are correct, an additional 4,320,000 cubic feet of water would be consumed in just 24 hours; 30,240,000 cubic feet in one week; 120,960,000 cubic feet in one month; and 604,800,000 cubic feet over the course of the entire five month Flow Plan. Again, the ACOE quoted that it would have taken 93 feet of water for the 2005 FEW Flow Plan to have been 100% successful based a minimum outflow of 250 cfs. It is apparent that the increase of 50 cfs would require that the pool to be much higher, which I understand is very unlikely. Further, if any future FEW Flow Management Plans allow for the increase of 50 cfs for downstream fisheries, I think that it would only be fair to increase the number of whitewater releases back to the original plan of 30 releases.

- Third, an unofficial vote was taken concerning the question: How many people in this room fish at the dam? With approximately 60 people in the room, only one individual raised their hand, and that individual quoted "I have fished at the dam but it was 30 years ago". Based upon the outcome of that vote, it is clear that fish spawning should be removed from all future FEW Flow Management Plans and the priority of the future plans should focus on downstream fishing and whitewater boating.

Additionally, concerning the 2006 FEW Flow Management Plan: I would like to suggest that the plan follow the same dates and discharge amounts as the

2005 plan, and that there are once again 22 whitewater releases scheduled.

By scheduling the releases on the same weekends every year, it would make it easier for ALL river users to make plans and schedule trips to the Lehigh River . I would also like to suggest that the minimum flow follow the 2005 plan of 250 cfs in May and June, and that the minimum flow is decreased to 200 cfs for July, August, and September in order to conserve water during the dry months.

Thank you for your consideration in my comments.


October 20, 2005

Thanks for providing an opportunity to discuss next year's water release plan with the stakeholders that use the Lehigh.

Our organization (Lehigh Coldwater Fishery Alliance) appreciates the open dialog that has been established between the Army Corp officials.

Also, thank you for the insight into the legislative process that will enable us to assist in getting the appropriations for the Study that will be performed on the FEW and Lehigh River to enhance the trout fishery as well as whitewater opportunities.

Again, thanks for all your efforts. Look forward to future discussions and meetings.


October 19, 2005

Lehigh Valley Canoe Club Comments on 2005-2006 Lehigh River Plans
Lehigh Valley Interest Statement on Lehigh River Whitewater Releases



October 18, 2005

Thanks for the opportunity to add my thoughts on managing the flows from the Francis E Walter dam for 2006.

Some background info: I am an avid fisherman, and own a vacation home in White Haven Poconos, which adjoins the Lehigh Gorge State Park . As a result, I spend at least 30 days a year fishing the Lehigh River below the dam. Managing the flow from the dam is very important to me.

As I see it there are 3 options for flow management:

1. Go back to the pre 2005 days. Basically there was no formal plan, and releases were based on the pool level and amount of rainfall. I believe this is no longer an option.

2. Plan similar to the 2005 plan. While this option provided several benefits - set dates / times for water releases and improved downstream flows, its weakness was obvious when the area experienced lower than normal rainfall. The increase in pool elevation was not sufficient to allow water releases once there was not rain for an extended period of time. The result was cancelled releases and low summer flows. I'm not sure that this option is viable for the future.

3. New approach for 2006 and beyond. My recommendation would be to determine the feasibility of maintaining a significantly higher pool elevation in the future. Obviously, the engineers would have to make certain that the dam could fulfill its flood control mission, with the higher pool elevation. If this is feasible, then the amount of water in the pool would be sufficient to provide several benefits.

a. The higher pool elevation would provide more recreational opportunities above the dam. Plans could be developed to add launch sites and provide access to the "lake".

b. There would be more water available for scheduled releases during the summer months. My recommendation would be for whitewater releases every other weekend. This would provide a balance between whitewater activities and fishing opportunities.

c. If the pool elevation is sufficient, the possibility exists for the "lake" to develop a thermocline, and the releases would be colder water which would enhance the fishing below the dam. I believe that if this is possible, that the Lehigh River could become a very good cold water fishery. The economic benefit to the region could be significant.

I realize that option # 3 would require a lot of time and effort, but I believe the benefits are worth the effort. We have an opportunity to enhance the whitewater activities, and improve the fishery at the same time. Again the economic benefit of both groups utilizing the river could be tremendous. Let me know if you need anything further.


October 17, 2005

Is there a web site or link where one can see the current depth of the dam?


October 16, 2005

Near perfect conditions in the Lehigh Gorge this weekend!  Thank you for the release...1500 CFS is a fantastic level.

Now, can we reduce discharge to equal incoming for the week and have another 1500 CFS release next weekend?


October 12, 2005

Lehigh Coldwater Fishery Alliance Francis E Walter 2005 Plan Review & 2006 Flow Management Plan Questions, Comments and Recommendations


October 12, 2005

Thank you for the release on the Lehigh this weekend.

I will be there along with many of my kayaking friends.

I am impressed by the "unscheduled" decision to release for the weekend.

It certainly helps to ease the frustration after many weeks of drought


October 12, 2005

First let me thank all the parties involved in planning the 2005 release schedule. While Mother Nature threw a wrench in the works it was basically a good starting point. I agree with many of the posts I read regarding more storage of water earlier in the season. I don't pretend to know what the pool height should be but I'm sure it can be increased without compromising realistic flood control probabilities. Secondly as an avid kayaker and guide for 20 years on the Lehigh the best levels for play and rafting are 1000-1500 cfs. These levels make it easier to get the guests down the river while keeping them in their rafts. At lower levels the number of rocks above and just below the surface increase the number of swims and pins or snags that occur. Again thanks for the try and allowing us to give you informed input.


October 12, 2005

Thank you for the releases this weekend.

I know it's been an unusually dry summer, and it's been hard to do this flow study that we (Lehigh lovers united) have pushed so hard for. I know there are a lot of boaters out there without the patience and understanding needed to conduct this exercise. And I'm sure you must feel the brunt of it. I know, cause I hear it all the time. So thank you for working so close with the boating community, I know it's not easy!


October 12, 2005

The paddling community is wondering if the Corps will be holding back water for a "whitewater release" this weekend and next, or will the pool be dropped to 1300?

Radar as of this morning shows lots of green heading towards the Bear Creek watershed - I am sure you guys will be dumping some to make room for the coming rains.


October 11, 2005

I am writing to inquire about a release from Francis E. Walter Dam.  I am unofficially representing a group of whitewater paddlers from the Harrisburg area that have been closely monitoring release updates for the Lehigh.  While I am unable to see any mention of an October 15-16 release, it appears that a large portion of the group is under the impression that this coming weekend is the final "official whitewater release."  I was wondering if this is in fact true.

Despite recent cancellations, I would like to applaud all involved parties that pushed for the increases in releases this year.  This provides an opportunity for Pennsylvania to attract whitewater paddlers that may otherwise travel to West Virginia and other destinations south.

Somewhat familiar with the decision making process with respect to the release volumes, I was wondering if there is a site on the internet that has the pool elevation behind Francis E. Walter Dam?  In addition, is there a level that the elevation must exceed for a release to occur?  I know that this information is impacted by factors like fish spawning and water temperature, but any general information would be helpful in planning future trips to the Lehigh area.


October 11, 2005

I'm hoping some of the water in the FEW Dam could be used for a whitewater release on the Lehigh River this coming weekend. 

Thank you in advance for doing anything you can to help us paddlers.


October 11, 2005

All of its been covered, both pro and con, the dam is built and the road has been raised. Spring releases of 6000 only serve a purpose if flooding is threatened, a reasonable level should be maintained for times of drought and release timings should be at optimum intervals to give the best water levels at peak times. I support Senator Greenleaf's efforts on a fair and equitable usage of the Lehigh Basin . It can serve everyone, rafters, paddlers and fishermen alike. Lets work together on this.


October 10, 2005

I enjoy whitewater kayaking, but understand the problems you have in serving different constituencies. I really appreciate the extended release schedule, but the fact that you cancelled some, due to the drought will help to satisfy those who felt you were in the hands of the outfitters and boaters who do represent a minority of the population. I think, to date, you've done a great job.


October 10, 2005

Since the unusually heavy rainfall over the past weekend and with the cancelled previous releases, will the ACE adjust the release schedule for fall whitewater on the Lehigh?  Thanks for your planned releases for 2005 despite the fact the precipitation budget did not cooperate.


October 9, 2005

Now that we have a new dam road, please use the 30+ feet of extra pool for weekend (only) releases of 1000-1500 until it is gone.  The outfitters can salvage the rest of the fall foliage season and most private boaters will keep paddling as long as the air temp is 40 or higher...that pool could take us out several weekends!


October 8, 2005

It would be very helpful if the comments under public comment were dated so that we have a better idea of their relevance in the sequence of events.


October 7, 2005

First of all, I wanted to express my appreciation for the releases that were held in 2005 and for the timely communication on releases that were canceled.  I most definitely hope that for 2006 a similar approach can be adhered to.


October 7, 2005

Comments on 2006 Flow Management Plan

First, I fully support your efforts to enhance recreation on the Lehigh River . The releases that you were able to have in 2005 were greatly appreciated. My club, KCCNY, paddled all of the available summer releases. I thought that the turnout for each was quite good. Each day that we were there, we saw most of the other local paddling clubs as well as many individual paddlers, and of course, lots of rafts. Although the flow was cut-off fairly early in the day to conserve water, there was enough to finish the river. It is helpful to know this in advance, so your publication of the schedule was very helpful in planning the trips.

While we are all disappointed that there was not enough water to release as scheduled in August and September, I also accept the facts of life as Mother Nature did not cooperate this year.

Please try again next year. Droughts are rarely two years in a row, and hopefully we will have better weather for kayaking next year.

Just one suggestion in the event that there is not enough water again and releases have to be restricted. I think it would be preferable to have only a Saturday release, cancel Sunday and use the water to maintain another Saturday release schedule. It seemed to me on the river that Saturdays were more popular than Sundays, although this would add to the crowding, it is better than no water. I am only suggesting this in the event that there is not enough water to maintain a planned schedule similar to the one in 2005.

Water levels of 750 to 1000cfs are the optimal for general whitewater recreation.

Keep up the good work. We appreciate your efforts and enjoy recreation on the Lehigh River .


September 29, 2005

This year we had an abundance of water in the spring.  Within a week of that rain, and without any additional rain forecasted, you guys decided to dump somewhere around 5,000 cfs all day from Monday to Friday.  Forgive me for not having documented dates, but I'm sure you can access your own flow information.  I feel this unfortunate move has affected the rest of the season.  I do understand that we are in a drought, and we cannot have releases if we receive no water.  I am saying that I hope if given similar circumstances that ACE might consider a different course of action.  Instead of blowing all the water in five days .. we could have all enjoyed whitewater releases for a few months this summer and fall.  As a paddler I am disappointed.  As a taxpayer I'm irate.  Please get it together and try to do a better job going forward.


September 16, 2005

It is imperative that water be conserved above the Francis E. Walter Damn since long-term forecasts trend in favor of drought in the area that may persist for several years. Foolishly squandering the precious water resource for the pleasure of a few thrillseekers who ride currents and waves is an abuse of governmental power, and may result in litigation against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The focus should be on maintaining water for the long term sustenance of the citizens, including drinking and irrigation of crops, not paddlers and rafter thrillseekers. Recently, it appears that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has astutely stopped planned water releases, and hopefully this wise operational mode continues.  Government should operate for the greater good and common weal not serve the interests of a few rafting companies and their thrillseeking customers, most of whom do not even live in the region served by the water resource. 


September 15, 2005

I am very disappointed that those Government Representatives deceived the Public when the Francis E. Walter Dam was initiated and built, all the rhetoric and lies about flood control of the Lehigh and Delaware Rivers, were an outright deception, the only real use today is recreational and about ninety percent use is for those who participate in White Water Rafting which constitutes (? .006 percent of the population) and disregards the supposedly original intent of Flood Control that would benefit about 100 percent of those in the Lehigh and Delaware River Valley's. I am quite confident that Private interest and money dictates the control and usage of this Dam. Keep up the good work.


September 14, 2005

The FEW flow went from 65cfs to 96cfs. Don't get me wrong, it is great to see the increase. However, unless the flow will remain just as high or higher, the increased flow could be better used over the weekend when there will be several thousand rafters on the river below Jim Thorpe. The question is: can ACE please save the added flow until Friday AM and release it over the weekend?


September 5, 2005

There seems to be a difference of 20cfs in the postings on the lee page for the Lehigh river and the real page on pa flows-can you tell me why-I am a boater and this difference could be critical. look forward to hearing from you


August 31, 2005

Thanks for the timely info that you have been sending about the release plans. It has helped a lot. "Dam" shame new plans had to be followed by such a dry year for you.


August 31, 2005

I am writing in regards to the remaining releases scheduled for 2005. The forced cancellation of the August releases has taken me by surprise. When we went onto one of the rafting outfitters websites and noticed they still had the releases down as scheduled. It wasn't until after we drove the 5 hours to get to the Lehigh River to find out that the release was cancelled. Now I have the official USACE website bookmarked and that shouldn't happen again.

What does is the future for the remaining releases in 2005? How is the determination made as to if there will be a release or not? When will these decisions be made? i.e. how much in advance or it be a last minute cancellation? Will the USACE impound more water earlier next year in order to fulfill its obligation to meet the scheduled releases?


August 17, 2005

I very much appreciate your continued information on the whitewater releases.  While I regret I will again not be able to come out and play (and I sure hope you will join our boating community during one of the future releases), I do understand that you are doing the best you can with what nature handed you. 


August 10, 2005

I am interested in visiting the Frances Walter Dam area, and downloaded the map.  It shows various Pool elevations, and also a "possible new boat launch location".  Does this mean that the dam will be raising the usual level of the impounded water?  I notice that the dam release was postponed because the water was below 1310', and wonder if 1392 will be the new standard water level.


August 2, 2005

Well, Well, Well, the only sarcastic remark I may have is.. due to the early season over zealous approach of the public and others, the fish and boating communities along with the biological communities in the river shall suffer the rest of the season.


August 3, 2005

Thanks for your email notice of the release cancellations for this weekend.  I know the weather's been really hot and we haven't had much rain but if more water were kept behind the dam we might have had enough water to keep the river running as promised.  Many people have worked very hard to make a plan for this year.  It seemed feasible if more water was saved as requested. 

I'm really disappointed especially since it's the only real game in town for whitewater paddling.  I have such a great time with friends on the Lehigh.  It's a wonderful river.

Many thanks for your concern and all your help with this.  I'm sure you're doing all you can to make it work for everyone.


August 1, 2005

What happened to the minimum flow rate of 200 CFS that was part of the new management plan for the Francis E Walter dam?

Reaching a balance between the different water users is by no means a small undertaking.  I commend you for this undertaking.  Irregardless of the special interest groups represented here the reality of the situation is this.  Weather it be rafter, fisherman or site seer there is one common thread.  That thread is the open spaces, wildlife and nature attract the tourists.  I have fished the river for nearly 35 years and have learned that sharing the bounties of its resources is paramount.  One thing that is certain is that river levels have never been managed in support of the fishery, nature or science.  I spend on average 20 man-days per year fishing the river and drive over 2 hours per trip to do this.  I would hope and encourage that the Corps of Engineers places the survival and betterment of the fishery as its top priority.  Secondly I would hope that the farmer not be forgotten and water uses for the local governments be given second priority.  With the rate at which the Poconos are growing I think it a matter of time before the resources of the river will be looked in a different light.  Personally, I believe a trophy wild fishery would provide a greater impact to the economy.  Tourism especially the family type are not based solely on whitewater rafting trips.

Remember betting living through science.


First off let me praise the efforts of all the agencies involved in manipulating the flow to try to appease everyone. "You can please some of the people some of the time but you can not please all of the people all of the time". Army Corps, PFBC, DCNR, Wildlands Conservancy my hats off to you for your effort on the compromises. There are a lot of special interest groups involved with a lot of money at stake for everyone. We truly have a wonderful resource at our disposal  being the dam and its tailwaters. Getting the pool level permanently altered will take an act of Congress, it won't be easy but can be accomplished. Changing the pool level temporarily will give the added data for future studies and this can be done without violating the flood control primary goal and also achieving the secondary goal of recreation. Keep listening, be fair and come up with a reasonable goal for all parties involved.  You are well on your way to establishing a schedule to benefit everyone. Mistakes will be made, agenda's will be altered, especially at Mother Nature's hand, but in the long run the interest of everyone can be addressed. Come up with a flow to help the wildlife, insect life, the fisherman, the rafting community. You can do it!! Don't let the grumbles of some or the naysayers put a chip on your shoulders. Take the good let the rest go, move on make informed decisions. After attending some of the meetings I am impressed with the knowledge pool from which you have to draw your conclusions as well as implement the future releases. You have intelligent well versed individuals in your ranks use them. Keep up the good work.


This year we had an abundance of water in the spring.  Within a week of that rain, and without any additional rain forecasted, you guys decided to dump somewhere around 5,000 cfs all day from Monday to Friday.  Forgive me for not having documented dates, but I'm sure you can access your own flow information.  I feel this unfortunate move has affected the rest of the season.  I do understand that we are in a drought, and we cannot have releases if we receive no water.  I am saying that I hope if given similar circumstances that ACE might consider a different course of action.  Instead of blowing all the water in five days .. we could have all enjoyed whitewater releases for a few months this summer and fall.  As a paddler I am disappointed.  As a taxpayer I'm irate.  Please get it together and try to do a better job going forward.


It is imperative that water be conserved above the Francis E. Walter Damn since long-term forecasts trend in favor of  drought in the area that may persist for several years. Foolishly squandering the precious water resource for the pleasure of a few thrillseekers who ride currents and waves is an abuse of governmental power, and may result in litigation against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The focus should be on maintaining water for the long term sustenance of the citizens, including drinking and irrigation of crops, not paddlers and rafter thrillseekers. Recently, it appears that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has astutely stopped planned water releases, and hopefully this wise operational mode continues.  Government should operate for the greater good and common weal not serve the interests of a few rafting companies and their thrillseeking customers, most of whom do not even live in the region served by the water resource.


        I am very disappointed that those Government Representatives deceived the Public when the Francis E. Walter Dam was initiated and built, all the rhetoric and lies about flood control of the Lehigh and Delaware Rivers, were an outright deception, the only real use today is recreational and about ninety percent use is for those who participate in White Water Rafting which constitutes (? .006 percent of the population) and disregards the supposedly original intent of Flood Control that would benefit about 100 percent of those in the Lehigh and Delaware River Valley's. I am quite confident that Private interest and money dictates the control and usage of this Dam. Keep up the good work.


I was and am a harsh critic of the final storage and release plan for the Lehigh basin for 2005. That being said, I think the Corps has done an admirable job of making the best of a very dry year. Despite my fears, you have shown a flexibility in your water release policy that is truly refreshing. You have utilized current storage for scheduled releases, apparently in hopes of replenishment from what is projected to be an enhanced hurricane/storm season. This also provides you added capacity to handle such future events. In short, you have exhibited a wise and forward thinking approach to water management and utilization of the Walter dam’s recreational capabilities. This gives me hope that the Corps will be equally flexible and accommodating as we start planning for the 2006 release season. I expect you will be accepting comments during the winter in anticipation of the 2006 season, but I would hope we can have a deeper and earlier storage resulting in better downstream fishing and boating flows. Keep up the good work, you may be finally winning over your harshest critics.


First off, kudos to you and the rest of the Army Corps of Engineers affiliated with this project above the Lehigh River. You have done a wonderful job enhancing the pool capacity and bringing more whitewater to the region which is certainly starting to have the desired economic impact we all had hoped for when it was announced. Thank you for this!
My only question and concern is relative to the release durations that seem to draw the pool down in an unnecessary fashion when the water cannot be utilized for whitewater. A release that begins on a Friday night and occurs throughout the evening more than doubles the pool reduction seemingly unnecessarily where a release that begins at 4 or 5AM on a Saturday and concludes at 1 or 2PM that afternoon would both assist in the water conservancy of the reservoir and provide the necessary release levels for "good" whitewater ( 750cfs or greater discharge). There are other Army Corps groups, such as the one in Friendsville, Md above the Youghigheny River that schedule more "burstable" controlled releases (4 hour) that conserve water, maximize the release and above all would better achieve the original objectives in your charter for 2005. I apologize for the long-winded suggestion, but would appreciate some feedback on the viability both in the near term and long-term for this water management approach.


It appears with the planned whitewater release this weekend (may 28-29) the lake elevation will drop below the 2005 Plan of 1,330. How did this come about? It was stated in the 2005 Plan that during the months of May and June, the lake is not to fluctuate more than 5' - between 1300 and 1335'. How was one of the few requirements the PFBC added to the 2005 Plan overturned by the other agencies? And what is your take on how this will effect the in lake fishery??

I feel this is further proof that the emphasis for the enhancing the Lehigh River needs to be focused on the downstream river, below the dam. The whitewater releases provide a huge shot in the arm to the local economy, and what does the in lake fishery provide? That fishery is mediocre at best. And how many warmwater fisheries does this state have?

Going forward I suggest the PFBC look more at developing the downstream tailwater fishery. Do you know that as of a few weeks ago water temps varied by about 8 C from the top of the lake to the bottom. Stratification is setting up! I think it has been stated by the PFBC that there is not a chance of coldwater setting up in this lake...that is obviously not the case. Just think what more water in the lake could do to for downstream fishery and the whitewater community. In due time when a realistic lake level is agreed to and supported by studies, then development of the lake as a fishery can become an issue. And even boating pressure could be elevated from some of the other impoundments in the area.

By the way hatches on the lower Lehigh have been fantastic as of late and the trout fishing has been fantastic. I am also glad to see the whitewater folks got their releases.


I am extremely impressed with the temperature of the outflow temps from FEW!
As of 05.11.05 - the temps in the upper Lehigh at Stoddardsville are pushing 68F. Yet the outflow temps are only about 54f. This is fantastic for the trout population in the downstream Lehigh. Retention time has greatly been increased with the increased lake pool elevation. Please consider an even higher lake elevation. This will increase the number of white water releases as well as the volume of cold water that can be released during the critical summer months.


Thank you for the continued updates on the water releases on the Lehigh River. I really appreciate the e-mails. It is a wonderful effort on your part to keep us informed about the river conditions. Beside simply stating the level I also get a better view of the big picture of river use.


Thank you for the continued updates on the water releases on the Lehigh River. I really appreciate the e-mails. It is a wonderful effort on your part to keep us informed about the river conditions. Beside simply stating the level I also get a better view of the big picture of river use.

I recently visited PA with my two good fishing buddies to fish the Lehigh River. We came to PA from Ohio, Alabama and Florida to fish the Lehigh to catch big wild trout. Unfortunately, the water temps were not conducive to trout fishing, almost 80 degrees F. Since we are primarily catch and release fishermen we did not want to take the risk of endangering or killing the trout because of the water temperatures. Instead we decided to go elsewhere to fish, New York. We had planned this trip and looked forward to it since December of last year when I got the chance to fish the region for a couple of weeks.

I understand there are changes coming about with the Francis E Walter Reservoir. I ask that the Army Corps of Engineers conduct feasibility studies to increase the quantity of water stored in the reservoir. Storing enough water in the reservoir to sustain a release of cold water (~55 Deg F) all summer will enhance and possibly create a blue ribbon Wild Trout Fishery on the Lehigh River. This would enable us to come back to PA for more trips without the concern of water temps on the Lehigh.


TO:   All the partners in the 2005 Lehigh Management Flow Plan
FROM:   Ken Powley, President, Lehigh River Outfitters Association

Let me begin by expressing our appreciation and praise for all of you who worked so long and hard to develop this year's flow management plan, and who then labored week to week to try to make it work the best it could under drier-than-normal circumstances.

It has truly been a learning year, with Mother Nature teaching us again to always expect the unexpected.  We're especially grateful for the extraordinary efforts of the dam tenders and of folks at all levels of various agencies who worked very hard to try to "save" the June 23-24 event ... likely the most heavily scheduled boating weekend of the year.

Not surprisingly, there was a palpable measure of disappointment and frustration on the part of many hundreds of visitors that this past weekend's event, like so many others this Spring, was curtailed to a level that failed to measure up to the program's original targets.  To a degree, the promotional efforts undertaken by our members, by the Pocono Mountain Vacation Bureau and by area Chambers of Commerce have been compromised by our inability to consistently deliver what was expected. 

This is not a criticism of the Corps of Engineers' efforts, either leading up to this season, or during it.  To those of us who have watched the process closely, it is evident that COE has on many occasions gone the extra mile to calculate, recalculate, adjust, readjust, and implement the kinds of changes that have helped maximize the benefits across the board, to whatever extent possible.

But in some respects, we believe that COE has been dealt an impossible hand, characterized by too many conflicting objectives, with too many constraints and too little water to make any of the stated objectives reliably achievable.

In our view, it appears there are three primary objectives in the current plan, two which address fishery issues (one downstream and one in-lake) and one which addresses recreational boating.  In the absence of any apparent prioritization, these three objectives have been treated as if each was as important as the others, leaving all three objectives in peril at times.

In looking toward 2006, there are some adjustments that seem to be needed in order for the plan to become one that we can describe as reliable ... reliable enough to be actively promoted to the visiting public.

The first of these, of course, is the impoundment of a larger pool, with collection occurring in March rather than late April.  We understand that the earlier timing for the impoundment process is predicated on making progress on a new boat-launch area at the reservoir.  But whether it's impounded earlier or not, a larger starting pool will naturally enhance the reliability of the program, on all fronts.

The second suggestion is that the stated objectives be prioritized.  Enhancing the downstream fishery is an issue that has been on the table for decades and has a following of many hundreds, if not thousands of anglers.  Enhancing downstream recreational boating is similarly an issue that has been front and center for decades, and has a following of thousands who visit each year to participate in whitewater activities.  Attempting to develop a "natural" in-lake spawn is, as far as we know, a newer objective, raised only recently, and with limited appeal to a considerably smaller constituency.

We believe that all three objectives are noble, legitimate, and worthy.  But we don't believe that they should all be weighted with equal priority.  The first two seem to be clearly more important, have a much larger constituency, and have greater economic significance to the area as a whole.  Ironically, it is the third objective (limiting pool fluctuations during May and June) that has compromised both of the first two objectives throughout this period.  It may not be a case of the "tail wagging the dog" but it is certainly a matter worth considering as we look for improvements for the 2006 plan.

In our view, when water is scarce, something "has to give."  In many years, perhaps even most years, all three objectives can probably be achieved through a combination of efforts including the impoundment of a larger initial pool, shortening hours of release on whitewater weekends, and so on.  But when those drier-than-normal years come along, which they will, we believe it's important to protect those priorities and objectives that serve the greatest good in a measurable, quantifiable way.

We look forward to the opportunity to provide formal input later this year, through whatever process is developed for reviewing the results of the 2005 program, but we also wanted to go on record now with suggestions that we feel most strongly about.

As always, we appreciate your efforts, and look forward to ever-improving conditions, for anglers and boaters alike.



How dry is it?
Looking at the White Haven gauge, adjusting for releases, assuming no significant rain in the next week, it looks like the inflow to the dam will have been very close to 200 CFS for June 2005. Certainly the number will be no more than 220 and no less than 180. This is not quite a record low: 1962 and 1999 were 147 and 151 respectively. But 2005 will be somewhere from the 3rd to the 11th driest Junes of the last 86 years.
Combining May and June, three years were super dry, 1955, 1962, and 1999 under 240 CFS. Trying to remember May 2005 average inflow to Walters was probably between 300-400 CFS (likely in the lower half of that range). So this May-June period will likely finish between 4th and 11th driest at 250-300.
Hence, I will say ACE is trying to make the best of a very bad situation. It now looks like they are trying to assure some kind of a release each scheduled day throughout the season, or at least until Labor day. Probably they are saving a little ?cold? water to help the trout during the peak of any future heat waves.

Several of our members have asked me about the timing of whitewater recreational releases. Your email today gave the following release times.
"Saturday June 25 600 cfs from midnight Friday until noon Saturday
Sunday June 26 400 cfs from 7am until noon Sunday, at which time releases will be set to match outflow."
For safety reasons, few boaters like to be on the river before sunup. In fact, I don't know anyone who boats at night. As a result the first 6 or so hours of Saturday's release will be wasted.
Given the scarcity of water this year, it would seem to make sense to schedule the releases for times when they can be used, say between sunrise and late afternoon, or even from 10 AM to 4 PM, which would allow for drive time for those of us coming from points that are several hour drive away. Would it be possible to adjust the remaining releases for the season to take advantage of daylight, rather than the present schedule, which amounts in part to dumping water at night?


Please be advised that release flows take approximately the following time to reach the following locations at 600cfs:
- White Haven 2 hours.
- Rockport 7 hours.
- Glen Onoko 13 hours.
That said, the release must start at midnight get through the entire gorge by 1pm (the idea is to make the entire gorge run-able). Unfortunately, only the Upper Gorge (white Haven to Rockport) will be run-able on Sunday unless you plan to put in at 2pm at Rockport and take out at dusk at the Glen.

As of 1PM today you have not posted to the public the whitewater release amounts for this weekend. This is unsatisfactory to realize the most economic benefits. I understand the drought situation but we need advance information to use the resource. Also my constituents would rather have one good whitewater day instead of one poor day and another barely useable day. I understand the commercial outfitters want two days of income but private boaters want one quality whitewater day instead.

I have still not seen any "official" flow prediction for the FE Walter weekend release posted on USACE web site yet and it's Friday at 10am.
Do you realize that many people drive from hundreds of miles away for Lehigh releases and depend on accurate timely data from USACE.
Accurate and timely data allows people to make an informed decisions that include: travel plans, camping /lodging reservations, time off work, equipment rentals and purchases etc.....
Potentially there's going to be a bunch of unhappy river users who just assumed the release this weekend was going to be target flow 750-1000cfs as published. If the flow prediction was updated on the USACE web site for the weekend by the Wednesday preceding the scheduled release it would certainly help the river user community greatly.
I know you can't do anything about variable hydrologic conditions and the current lack of water, but not telling the public until the last minute what the release is going to be is not acceptable.

What happened to the 250cfs they said they would have
(Response covers the period from June 15 to June 22, 2005.)
Currently, and for the past week or so, we have been releasing a minimum of 140 cfs because inflow has been between 150 and 175 cfs.
According to the plan, once the pool elevation went below 1330 minimum flows would match inflow. Since the pool elevation is 1328 we are matching outflow with inflow.
We don’t have the water in the reservoir and there is no significant rainfall forecasted to meet the requirements of the current plan as outlined on our web site. This has been the situation for entire season and there is no forecast that shows the situation will change for the better. We were able to store water to the planned elevation of 1335 at the beginning of the season but it has been an historically dry year so far.
The cooperating agencies have made several modifications to the plan including white water release flows, minimum pool elevation, and minimum flows. These decisions were based on accommodating upstream and downstream recreation, while maintaining spawning habitat, and providing flexibility for flood control.

I see that you are working on recreational enhancements for the Lehigh. Might I realize that the two main usuer groups are whitewater enthusiasts and fishermen. I would like to suggest that the Army Corps try to hold back as much water as possible for summer releases. The trout fishery suffers in summer due to temperature elavations. A year round fishery would pump more money into the local economy, and offer boaters more water over the summer, when most amateurs get a chance to try boating and canoeing.


I am extremely impressed with the temperature of the outflow temps from FEW!
As of 05.11.05 - the temps in the upper Lehigh at Stoddardsville are pushing 68F. Yet the outflow temps are only about 54f. This is fantastic for the trout population in the downstream Lehigh. Retention time has greatly been increased with the increased lake pool elevation. Please consider an even higher lake elevation. This will increase the number of white water releases as well as the volume of cold water that can be released during the critical summer months.


I am writing you to commend the Army Corps of Engineers for their newly proposed Lehigh River management plan. The Corps flow release schedule is a great idea, and comes at an important time. This decision will benefit the Lehigh and Delaware River ecosystems, and provide improved recreation for boating and fishing.

Reliable white water releases will attract more tourism to the towns along the river, and bring much needed revenue to support the local businesses and outfitters. The local economy will improve, and the Lehigh Gorge State Park (and it's facilities) will be better utilized.
The Lehigh has now been given the potential to reach the same recreation status as the Youghagheny River in Ohiopyle PA.

As a boater who has been kayaking the Lehigh Gorge for twenty years, I can assure you that this new release schedule makes sense on many levels. It will positively impact the lives of many individuals and further enhance the appeal of this wonderful and special river.


I was very pleased to hear about the increased # of releases on the Lehigh. My wife and I kayak and fish and the Lehigh Is very convenient for us. I think that it will be good for local merchants also. We usually eat out, buy gas etc. when we are there.


I would like to state my displeasure at the planned white water releases for the months of May and June. It benefits the rafting community and disadvantages the fishing community. I raft once a year but fish every weekend during this period. I purchased a house in Blakeslee so that I could pursue fishing on the Lehigh. Now every weekend in May and June (the prime fishing months) is taken from me.

I ask that you reconsider the schedule so that it is more friendly to the fishing community.


I know you prefer we stay off the Upper for Saturday, how about Sunday?? and what will the flows be each day?? Thanks for the extra release days this year!!


Is this true that the Army Corps of Engineers are drawing down the pool of the FE Walter Dam to 1300 feet above sea level so that the PA Fish and Boat Commission can allow access to the beach available at that level? This would surprise me, and surprises all avid fishermen since this serves no real purpose other than to placate the few non-serious fishermen who would choose to fish behind the dam on the first weekend of trout season. Whilst I could understand the reduction of outflow to provide for and protect wading fishermen downstream of the dam, it seems a bit ludicrous to release all this water simply to satisfy the wishes of a few.

Questions abound among my peers in the downstream recreation interest groups. It seems that cleverly applied pressure by the PA Fish and Boat Commission has yielded a double benefit... 1) a pool level of 1300 feet above datum allows for a beach above the dam, to serve the few fishermen that will actually use it on the first weekend of trout season, and 2) the need to achieve the new pool level will result in far-below average outflows downstream until the new target pool is reached. This was yet another goal of the PA Fish and Boat Commission.

It seems that a few powerful people have really thrown their weight around. Can you explain any of this from the perspective of the Army Corps? If PA Fish and Boat has their way there would be no releases. This will cost the local economy dearly, and they seem to not have any acceptance of the importance of a better economy. Help me understand,


A few years ago I had a wonderfully successful encounter with the Corps in their management of the General Walters Dam on the Lehigh River and, given the current interest in how water releases will be handled with the modified dam, I wanted to thank you and the Corps again for your cooperation. In

2003 the American Canoe Association held the national championships for canoe poling just below the dam at the Corps' access road. It was a splendid event, attracting coverage from Paddler Magazine who sent a reporter-photographer who did a substantial photo article on the event including positive feedback about the Lehigh River, the gorge, and the water levels. The event was a success because we were able to count on the river running at a predetermined level which the dam operators were able to maintain for the whole day. With participants coming from as far as Maine, this reliability about water level was critical since there would not be time to find alternate sites if the river became too high or low.

Which brings me to my point. Maintaining the minimum flow of 250 for fishermen is also of great benefit to those of us in the canoeing world who do poling. Poling is at its best in medium to low water, anywhere from 250 up to 500 cfs. To be able to count on moderate releases in the future - holding back the high water or releasing extra during low rain periods - may hopefully enable us again to attract a canoe poling competition in the future.

On the flip side, the reliability of consistent high flow for many of the weekends will be awesome for those like myself who drive up to the Poconos to enjoy the river from the seat of a canoe or kayak. I hope at some point even to move to White Haven and the thought of such regular releases increases all the more the attractiveness of the area.

We're excited about the plan and hope you can stick with it.


I am an avid paddler and long time Lehigh River advocate and had hoped for the scheduled (1000 cfs) quality whitewater release weekend to occur.  I see you posted 400 cfs for Sunday.  400 cfs does not provide a quality release, please consider using Sundays water to make the Saturday event 750+ cfs as scheduled.  Without adequate water and timely knowledge of the releases the economic values of the resource will be unrealized.


I think the idea of increasing the number of water release days on the Lehigh is a great idea and fully support it.


I was curious to know when/if the road going over the top of the Francis E.

Walter was going to open to the general public. I use the current road to get to the Disc Golf course, which saves about 20 minutes (each way).

However when the water is stored, and the current road is flooded-we have to travel all the way into white haven. Just curious!


I think it's a good idea to raise the pool level. Will a new boat launch be constructed? Now the fish commission got to cooperate and stock a little more fish than trout.


It's Sunday rain stopped so the wife and I thought we would go up to the dam for a few hours of fishing. We knew the old road was already closed. The web site said it was at 1317 at 7:00 am . So just like you had said we could do, we drove through the picnic area and started to back down the road. Well look, just like I said somebody already did that, put their boat into the water and then pulled their truck and trailer about 5 feet up and parked in the middle of the road. So no body  else can launch their boat, is he at fault, of course, but there are no signs saying he can not do that. So I guess we'll take the new road and back down the other side. OH look the brand new PORK BARREL TWO LANE is closed. I knew we fishermen were going to get screwed but, I did not think it would be in the first week. But, I guess as long as some guy in Albrightsville is renting canoes it's alright.


I have had a vacation home in White Haven Poconos for 14 years. Our development borders Lehigh Gorge State Park, and the Lehigh River a short distance below Francis E. Walter Dam. I initially purchased this home due in part to the ease of access to the Lehigh River. As an avid fisherman, I am extremely interested in the White Water Release Schedule for Francis E.

Walter Dam.

In the 14 years that I have been fishing the river (I average @ 30 days a year fishing the river) my experience is that a release of water from the dam spells an end to fishing for the day. I have been fishing the river and catching fish, and when the release starts, the fish stop biting. It appears to me that the increase in flow causes the fish to stop feeding.

The Release Schedule posted on your website causes me concern, because there is no provision to maintain a consistent flow on the Non - Whitewater Weekends. As I indicated above, it is my opinion that the fishing suffers when the dam releases water. The Inflow = Outflow could mean a dam release due to rainfall on Friday or Saturday. In this case the fishing would be ruined for the weekend.

My suggestion would be to hold the water until Monday.

This would provide a consistent flow for the weekend, which is the prime fishing time. I realize that during flood conditions the dam has to "do its thing ", but a small amount of rain should not require a weekend dam release.

I think this is a reasonable solution, but would appreciate your comments.


I am an avid kayaker and back packer and enjoy the reservoir as well as the river and all it has to offer from kayaking to swimming, to just the shear beauty of it all.

Q1. Why wasn't more water held back during the recent flooding?

A1. During the April 2-4 2005 storm, Walter Dam held back 110 feet of water. When the inflow to the dam was over 20,000 cfs, we were releasing about 100 cfs, as the water control plan dictates. Completely shutting down flow would not be environmentally advisable, nor would any additional significant flood damage reduction benefits accrue.

Q2. Has the water ever reached the bottom of the large concrete spillway on the north side of the dam?

A2. No.

Q3. Has it ever flowed over?

A3. No.

Q4. If not then why was it built?

A4. It was built so that the dam could safely pass any storm that may be encountered without filling up and overtopping the dam.

Q5. Although much of the water that caused the flooding came in below the dam, and the Lehigh was held at flood stage or below with exception of where it flows into the Delaware. Wouldn't any little bit held back help save lives and property.

A5. This was all considered. The post storm releases did not occur until after the storm had passed and flood stages crested.

Q6. The large sign on the north side of the dam says that during flood conditions the gates would be closed, has this ever happened?

A6. The gates are only completely closed for purposes of a dam and conduit inspection. A minimum flow is always maintained in the river downstream of the dam; although the gates are only open a tiny fraction during large storms, in order to minimize downstream flood damages.

Q7. Wasn't the Francis Walter Damn built to save life and properties in the Lehigh valley?

A7. Yes.

In fact is has prevented an estimated $133,000,000 in damages since it went online in 1961.

Q8. What was the flow cut back to during the flooding?

A8. During the height of the storm, the inflow to the dam was close to 21,000 cfs. The outflow was just a few hundred.


American Whitewater's comments to F.E.Walter Reservoir Operation Technical Study (CENAP-PL-E-05-03)


I join other kayakers in urging you to expand the number of releases on the Lehigh for use by recreational boaters.


I am a kayaker and a taxpayer. I strongly believe that allowing more releases from the Dam would benefit the trout, the boaters, the outfitters and the local economy. Added releases with a higher flow output appears to be a win-win situation for everyone. Please offer as many releases as possible.


I'd just like to say that I support releases from the dam during the summer months in order to improve the Lehigh's trout fishery - especially further downstream.


I have been a member of the KCCNY kayak club for several years and learned to appreciate the beauty of rafting and kayaking in the Lehigh gorge. I took my first raft trip on the Lehigh and took my first Kayak lesson there as well. It would be wonderful if there were regular water releases on the Lehigh all summer so more people could be exposed to the joy and adventure of the whitewater experience in the stunning Lehigh gorge.


I first want to thank you for the additional releases on the Lehigh. I believe they will enhance the health of the river as well as the economies of the surrounding communities. However I think the flows for whitewater are really to low for a riverbed as wide as the Lehigh. More water actually makes it safer and easier to guide the rapids with non-boaters in rafts. I think if you look at the flows on the Deerfield in New England they have a much smaller riverbed but the flow is higher. Or did you ever consider enlisting American Whitewater in flow studies to find the optimal flows for whitewater recreation? These are just thoughts and not to be construed as negative input.


I would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed 2005 Release Schedule. I have been a whitewater paddler, and guide, on the Lehigh River for almost 20 years. First, I want to thank the USACE for taking into consideration this project, one that I can basically fully endorse. Providing this resource when otherwise unavailable truly is a momentous leap forward, and will be a wonderful benefit to the whitewater paddling community. I know the USACE has to balance the benefit this provides against the possible negative effects these releases will have on other recreational users of this resource. I am hopeful all users will benefit from the USACE proposals.

I would also like to comment regarding on how to possibly improve on this proposal. I believe for this to work, the pool should be allowed to increase to 1370-1390. During the drought, I believe the pool was allowed to increase to this level and there were releases of 500 cfs during the summer of 2003, although not enough for practical whitewater use (recreational float trips downstream were improved, however). By storing this amount of water, the ability to release for whitewater use and maintain average flows of 200-300 cfs during other periods and for maintaining the fish habitat could be better accomplished. Although whitewater releases of 750 cfs do provide an adequate level for whitewater recreation, 1000 cfs is actually a more operational level. This level provides more water for whitewater rafting operations, and by maintaining this level for those operations during the spring and summer releases it will be a benefit to all: recreational for the rafters/kayakers, and financial for the outfitters, retailers, and local businesses. This would have a huge economic impact on the area and could make the Lehigh a mecca during the spring and summer months when whitewater enthusiasts frequently look elsewhere for recreation due to inconsistent water flows.

Again, this is a very positive step forward. Hopefully, the knowledge gained from this project and the input of those affected will change the dynamics on the use of this resource and correct how it was utilized in the past. I believe all users can benefit from the changes that are being proposed. Not all may agree, but change is necessary. I applaud the USACE for taking this step forward to conduct this study in order to make those changes. I look forward to more frequent releases, consistent whitewater flows, improved habitat and the economic gains to this region.


I am a member of the Board of Directors at Lake Wynonah Property Owners Association in Schuylkill Co. PA. We have a 175 acre lake with unlimited horsepower. We are looking at safety issues with regard to our lake. I spoke with a representative of the Army Corps at Blue Marsh in Berks Co. They referred to a study done by the Army Corps which recommended a limit of 1 boat per 5 acres of water. Can you tell me how I could locate that study? I am trying to put together a boat safety recommendation for our community which would reduce the number of boats on the water at any one time. Thank you for any help you can provide.


Thank you for making the additional whitewater releases for 2005 available for recreational. As a frequent kayaker and kayak instructor for one of the local paddling clubs, KCCNY, I really appreciate this opportunity. We frequently paddle the Lehigh whenever water is available and especially look forward to the summer releases, when natural flow water is not usually available.

If this new schedule is successful, we would like to see the schedule expanded in the future. I think the recreational opportunity is good for the region, and especially good economically for the local area as it will increase tourism. Similar opportunities in other areas have shown this to be the case. With such a large population in the region, this is an obvious opportunity.


I am writing with regard to the plan for specific releases on the Lehigh River in 2005. I've been following this topic for some time and to keep this brief, may I simply tell you that I support the current plan for 22 release days. I wish we paddlers could have been consulted when the original proposed schedule was changed from 30 to the present 22 and hope one day to be able to move up to the 30 releases as originally promised.

Since we know a picture tells a story of a thousand words, please look at a collage I made from a day on the Lehigh with friends. See the joy ~ please continue to provide these opportunities. We love the Lehigh River!!!!!


I would like to express support for the plan, which calls for 22 release days per season. But I hope that we will eventually be able to move up to the 30 releases that was originally proposed. The Lehigh is a valuable resource as some of the most consistent whitewater in summer months. There are thousands of canoe and kayak enthusiasts in the greater New York / New Jersey / Pennsylvania area for whom the Lehigh is accessible.


I support the plan for 22 release days per season.

However I do hope that you will eventually be able to move up to the 30 releases originally promised.


My recommendation is to manage dam releases in such a way that water temperatures and volume are optimal for the support of the trout fishery in the Lehigh River downstream from the dam. From the dam down through the Lehigh Gorge, past Jim Thorpe, and beyond, has the potential to be a premiere trout fishery. This would be a great economic boon to the region, as it would attract many anglers, supporting many local small businesses. And it would provide great fishing recreation in a truly beautiful setting. Right now it is a beautiful setting and the trail provides good public access. But the fishing is mediocre at best, because summer flows are too low and too warm to support a substantial trout population.

I am concerned that the planned large weekend releases will deplete the water reserve needed to maintain coldwater conservation flows for the trout fishery in the summer.


I am writing on behalf of the Conservation Committee of the Kayak and Canoe Club of New York (KCCNY). KCCNY is a regionally based educational and recreational club with approximately 300 members in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Our club sponsors approximately 10 official trips on the Lehigh each year, and our message boards indicate that many of our members utilize the river regularly on "unofficial" trips. KCCNY has a strong interest in fostering recreational opportunities on the Lehigh, on which flows are administered by the Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) and we are well situated to see the many positive impacts that river releases offer to the local economy.

Recently, on March 2, 2005 , our club commented favorably on the ACE's plan, unveiled on February 24th, to provide 30 release days during the whitewater boating season. All indications were that the ACE had arrived at this number after considered research and consultation with the recreational and environmental communities, as well as the appropriate state agencies.

Subsequently, on March 9, the public notice was issued for CENAP-PL-E-05-03.

The language in that notice appeared to call for potentially fewer releases, with no releases guaranteed for the months of May and June. We sought clarification from ACE, and were notified by e-mail on March 28 that the study proposed releases on May 14-15, May 28-29, June 11-12, June 25-26, July 2-3, July 23-24, August 6-7, August 20-21, September 3-4, September 17-18, and October 1-2, for a total of 22 releases. We understood from the email that the reduced number of releases was necessary to ensure a constant pool height of 1335 feet to encourage fish spawning within the reservoir.

I am writing to express our club's support for the flow management plan contained in CENAP-PL-E-05-03, as amended by the information in the March 28 e-mail, which is appended for reference. We believe that the study will allow ACE to work out any issues with the releases, and that it represents a compromise between various interests.

That said, it is our hope that in future years, once the present study is complete, that ACE can begin to move toward their own stated goal of 30 releases per season. We also feel that the ACE should study the possibility of higher reservoir levels to accomplish this goal.

We would like to commend the ACE for seeking the advice and input of the paddling community, and point out that this sort of full and frank communication goes a long way towards earning the trust and respect of the recreational community. KCCNY looks forward to working with the USACE and other boating and recreational groups in order to ensure the success of recreation on the Lehigh River.


I have previously written in support of the newly proposed management plan which provides for increased whitewater releases. I am therefore pleased that the plan will be implemented this year with 22 releases, and hope that the number can ultimately be increased to the 30 releases originally proposed.

As I mentioned before, I have paddled the sections below the dam on numerous occasions for recreational purposes with the Kayak and Canoe Club of New York. I have also helped with instructional programs run by the Appalachian Mountain Club on the Lehigh, and have taken instructional courses there with my wife and with my grandson, who is a Pennsylvania resident. In addition, my wife, my daughter (a PA resident), and her two children have taken raft trips on the Lehigh.

The additional releases will help all of us make better use of the river, by providing more opportunities for myself, my family, and my paddling clubs. It will also be helpful in coordinating schedules with the non-paddlers in the family, who can be riding their bicycles on the trail above the Gorge while we paddle.

Naturally, while we are there, we always find time to dine in local restaurants, and often camp in local campsites, and shop in towns such as Jim Thorpe.

My entire extended family is looking forward to taking advantage of the additional releases this year, and hope that they will become a permanent fixture.


I've known, or heard rumors, that the Corps had been working to improve the infrastructure at the Francis E. Walter Dam in the Poconos for whitewater recreation for awhile now. I was recently very pleased to hear that a water release schedule was proposed by the Corps that benefits paddlers and other outdoors people.

I am writing to express my great appreciation. It's a wonderful area that I have loved visiting for many years. Even though I don't live there and never have, it holds a place in my heart because of the natural beauty I've enjoyed there and the fun that I've had. As I reflect back, I think of how it's benefited our communities and our children by providing a great recreation area.

Thank you, and please pass my gratitude on to any politicians involved! From as far away as Long Island, thanks!


I applaud the increase of water releases from FEW Dam as an important first step towards revitalizing the Upper Lehigh River. I believe the river would benefit even more, if a system of controlled releases were instituted to maintain a cold water fishery. The river has the potential to become one of the best cold water fisheries on the East coast if higher water levels were maintained at the dam and proper flows were established. I believe these controlled flows would not only benefit the environment of the Upper Lehigh, but also could provide an economic boom to the area.


I am a member of KCCNY and a frequent a Lehigh paddler. I support the 22 release program and am hopeful it will be expanded to 30 in the future. The Lehigh is a gem and the releases allow large numbers of us to enjoy this scenic river at a level which is safe for many skill levels.


I spoke with you a bit at the Split Rock event. I think the ACOE has achieved a great first step in enhancing the Lehigh River recreationally.

But, I think the ACOE can do much more to take the Lehigh River to the next level. And by that I mean, maximizing the coldwater pool in the reservoir to allow coldwater bottom releases from FEW. If this could be achieved throughout the summer months a potentially world-class coldwater fishery could be created. Currently, very little of the fishery is enhanced with the 2005 plan - except for the 250 cfs min.

Just think what a win-win this could be for the rafters and the fisherman...they could easily co-exist - we all want the same thing - which is more water. However, the fisherman want the cold water, not just more water...and with some modifications to the management plan at FEW this could be doable. Not to mention if the two valves located at 1,297' were operational. Why aren't they? Just think what this could do to conserve the coldwater.

Here is a quote from a DRBC document:

QUOTE FROM DRBC - http://www.state.nj.us/drbc/04flowreport/index.htm -

DOCUMENT: "Changes in F.E. Walter operating policies could provide flow augmentation benefits for whitewater rafting, establishment of a naturally reproducing trout fishery, and other purposes."

As a fisherman here in Pennsylvania, I feel creating this wild trout fishery is as much of a priority as fulfilling your 'flood control' mission.

Working Group Response: Thank you for your input regarding flow management from the F.E.Walter Dam. I just wanted to let you know that our Engineering folks are looking into the operation of the bypass valves. I do know the valves have not been used in several years, however if we are able to place them in operation during this experimental year, we will attempt to gather some temperature information at the tower and the downstream gages. Since the input received from our stakeholders will help form the basis for subsequent flow management plans, I encourage you to continue to share your experiences and thoughts regarding our shared interest in improving the recreational opportunities on the Lehigh. Thanks again, Austin Gerrard


I would just like to take the opportunity to say thanks and that I am thrilled that a potential wild trout fishery below the Francis E. Walter Dam tailrace is being taken into consideration regarding the new flow management plan! I'm sure I can speak on behalf of thousands of local anglers-as well as the tens of thousands that would follow-by saying that the opportunity to fish over wild trout is a privilege that should not be taken lightly and we applaud your efforts.

Anyone that has fished the upper Delaware River-as well as any of the great tailrace trout fisheries out west-has seen what an opportunity like this can present for the local economy. Particularly regarding fly fisherman. They will travel great distances and spend a LOT of money to sample a top-notch wild trout fishery in a beautiful setting... and there is every reason to believe that the Lehigh River could provide just such an attraction. The very thought of a large, stream bred rainbow trout peeling line off my reel while an osprey soars overhead with the mist still hanging in the mountains above brings a smile to my face.

I realize that there is still work to be done and we live in a land of compromise... and that the Lehigh Gorge area is a valuable paddling resource as well as a potential world-class trout fishery, but nothing happens without that most important first step. Congratulations on hatching a great plan and good luck in "fine-tuning" it for the future.


I would like to make a few comments regarding the proposed flow regime for the Lehigh River below FE Walters Dam.

Let me begin by saying that I think it is a wonderful idea that the flow is going to be more strictly regulated. The idea of a minimum flow will be most beneficial to the trout which inhabit the river. I recall when a friend and fly shop owner first approached Congressman Kanjorski about cold water releases over 15 years ago. It's great to see that they will finally become reality.

However, I really have to question if it is necessary to supplement the natural flows with releases on every weekend in May and June. A flow of 1000 cfs at White Haven renders the river unfishable for the overwhelming majority of wading anglers. That flow is unsafe for wading. With the schedule as planned their will be no opportunity for a visiting angler to fish the Lehigh on the weekend during the prime time for fishing.

I realize that Mother Nature often conspires to make the river unfishable in the Spring, and I am willing to deal with that as it occurs. I cannot in good conscience sit back and allow whitewater releases to ruin whatever fishing opportunities Mother Nature hasn't.

Please reconsider your release schedule. Why not release more water during the months of July and August? Let the natural conditions prevail during May and June. Why not release water during the week during the summer months? Fishing is generally poor during the heat of the summer and the additional water will be better utilized by the rafting interests. Rafting to me seems like a "summer vacation" activity, why not make it so?


I am writing in support of the planned releases on the Lehigh River. The increased volume of water will be a focus of attention by individuals who come to the area for recreational purposes (fishing and rafting/boating) as well as the individuals who make a living meeting the needs of these individuals while on the river. The interest that the releases will generate are going to be felt both on and off the river. Having a great

resource such as the Lehigh river and the managers of that resource using it to the benefit of these many individuals will undoubtedly spark a great deal of interest in the Lehigh River area and beyond. Local people and visitors to the area alike will benefit from this new proposed management plan.

I wholeheartedly support and applaud your efforts to bring this to reality and look forward to the start of these releases in May, 2005.


I love to paddle the Lehigh River. I mean there are fewer things in the world that give me a better feeling. Please don't cut back the River Release schedule. If anything, please add more releases over 800.


I am a homeowner in Bear Creek Lakes, Penn Township, Pennsylvania. I learned of plans to relocate a road near the Dam to allow greater storage capacity and consequently greater water releases for recreational uses downstream. I support this plan and would appreciate being kept up to date of any new developments to continue my support.


We are avid kayakers, paddling up to 40 days each year.

We strongly support the following water releases that benefit Lehigh River kayakers and rafters.


As a whitewater paddler and a local resident of Carbon County, I strongly support the ACE proposal to increase by 5x the number of scheduled Whitewater releases on the Lehigh. Not only will this enhance local sport and recreation, but it will provide a strong economic shot in the arm to local business in an area which needs it.


Please share this with all concerned persons and those that helped bring about this most wonderful news. Being an avid paddler who works many weekends, some seasons I have missed most releases if not all. Last year with all the extra rain opened the river on many weekends, that a release was not scheduled, much to my delight. I tried to suggest to the park service on several occasions, that doing what you have now done would improve the economy of the area. As I also travel 2 hours, I sometimes prefer to find lodging nearby if it's a Saturday and Sunday release. And I'm sure fisherman as well as paddlers end their days hungry and are looking for a good meal. And then there is gear to be purchased.


I am a recreational paddler, and I am really excited by the opportunity to paddle the Lehigh River more often this year. Keeping a balance between the needs of all the different people who use the river must be a challenging endeavor. But please keep the newly scheduled releases.

I have just read quite a few memos in support of the proposed 2005 water release schedule. As an avid outdoorsman I have seen the increase in recreational river use by both fishermen, boaters and paddlers and understand the impact on the environment and local economy. I do believe there is a happy medium for both anglers and paddlers. The local economy benefits from both. I support using sound science to improve the quality of water and trout fishery in the entire drainage.


WOW great idea - This should not only make the kayakers happy but also be a major boost to the local economies. The merchants and tour operators will love the boost to the bottom line.


Although you may recognize my name as being one of the long-standing critics of the ACE management of the FEW Dam, please allow me to join my fellow whitewater enthusiasts in applauding you for taking dramatic strides towards allowing the Lehigh River to reach its recreational and economic potential.  My frustration with the ACE over the years stemmed not only from what I perceived as a recreational resource being squandered, but also from what I believed this has meant in terms of foregone economic benefits.  Having grown up in Carbon County, just a few miles from Jim Thorpe, I know first-hand the lack of employment and economic opportunity the area offers.  I have also witnessed the condition of Jim Thorpe slowly improve in this regard as a direct result of increased tourism.  I personally benefited from tourism in that I was able to work on the Lehigh as a river guide during summer breaks while I was in college, and believe me, summer jobs for kids were in very short supply. 

With regular and dependable whitewater releases (at levels of at least 750 CFS), the Lehigh could become the most popular whitewater destination in the Northeast.   With this would come more tourist dollars, more jobs, more tax revenue, etc. This will not happen overnight, but given time and consistent releases, the Lehigh River will provide a significant economic boost to Carbon County.  I know that when I paddle the Lehigh, I spend money in Carbon County!

22 releases is a great start!  The original 30 proposed would be even better!!  While I understand there are other stakeholders, namely those the Fish and Boat commission claim to represent, please keep in mind that there are thousands of miles of trout streams in the Commonwealth and only a few miles of this caliber of whitewater.  The sheer numbers of boaters using the river, when compared to the fishers, speaks for itself.  After all, this is a democracy.

Please consider the suggestion to modify releases such that the dam is opened 12 hours per day (instead of all weekend) in order to maximize the release potential.  Also, please remember that that many boaters (private boaters and raft customers alike) have been burned by releases of 450 and 500 and 600 CFS over the years.  These levels do not provide the whitewater experience people are looking for, in fact, these levels are dreadful...and this has caused many to stay away.  What I am saying is that it will take some time for the word to spread and for people to believe the Lehigh really will have the whitewater that's been promised.  In other words, please give the plan some time before drawing any conclusions about how many people the river can attract.  Finally, please allow us private boaters to have a seat at the table when, in the future, river related issues are discussed with the F&B Commission, the outfitters and the other stakeholders.

The Lehigh River Gorge is an incredible place.  I look forward to there being 22 releases, and I look forward to an expanded plan and more releases in future years.

I am writing to thank you for your support of the new release schedule and management plan for the Lehigh River. As a paddler and user of the river, I was overjoyed when I became aware of the proposed number of releases for 2005. I know that these releases will benefit not only the local paddling community, but also expand economic opportunities for the communities and businesses along the river corridor.


Please consider the following:

 - Five feet of pool is not much to work with when trying to secure releases every weekend in May and June. Releasing water during these months is very important to the whitewater boaters and these months are the easiest to secure since natural flows are the highest at this time of the year. Inflows often drop below 250 cfs before June and raising the pool to the maximum allowed for long term storage (15% or 1365.00) would provide much more water to work with (if the pool is allowed to fluctuate by only five feet). At 1365, five feet of pool is approx. three times the water compared to 1335. A pool of 1365 would help to secure- that the FEW pool does not fluctuate more then 5 feet in May or June for fish spawning, the recreational releases in May and June as well as the rest of the scheduled whitewater releases, and the minimum 200 to 250 cfs for downstream fisheries enhancement throughout the season.

 - A huge amount of water can be saved by changing the policy/procedure concerning when the water is turned on and turned off. At the present time, releases are started at 4pm Friday and turned off around 2 pm on Sunday, this is 46 hours of water being released. If you turn the water on at 2 am and off at 2 pm daily, the water will reach White Haven by 4 am , Rockport by 7:30 am , and Glen Onoko by noon and will drop at White Haven at 4pm and Rockport at 7:30 pm. This allows whitewater boating through the entire Lehigh Gorge and as far as Bowmanstown, while saving 22 hours of water over a two day release. Yes, you may have to pay a little overtime, however when you take into consideration the benefits of saving 22 hours of water, it is well worth the investment.

In addition to saving 22 hours of water, by doing daily gate adjustments, the "prime" fly fishing section of the Lehigh River (the FEW dam to just below Tannery) would offer both the whitewater boaters and fly fishermen the opportunity to enjoy their sport, both in the same day and on every weekend!

Example: Fly fishing would be possible on Friday evenings if the water was not turned on until after dark. Then the whitewater boaters would use the river on Saturday, the gate is cut back on Saturday at 2 pm and by 4 pm the water would be back down and the fly fishermen could use the river again on Saturday evening. The water is turned on again after dark on Saturday and the whitewater boaters can use the river again on Sunday, the water is cut back again on Sunday at 2 pm and once again the fly fishing is good again by

4 pm . That I am aware of, most fly fishing is done in the evenings and the fluctuation of the river should not have a negative effect on the feeding habits (or hitting on fly's) of the fish. Everyone is happy (well, except for the gate keeper).


I just thought I should let you know how pleased I was to find that I can paddle for 30 days on the Lehigh in 2005. I hope that you will be able to maintain that schedule.


I'd like to thank you on behalf of my family for your recent help in the decision to provide more water releases for river running during the whitewater season. Between my parents, myself and my husband, and my children, we have three generations enjoying the Lehigh River . We are all excited by the opportunity the more frequent water flows offer us for the season


I am in favor of all the added dam release dates, especially every weekend in May and June.


I am happy to hear that you have added release dates, especially every weekend in May and June.


Very pleased with proposed water release schedule, especially each weekend in May and June . All of your hard work is appreciated.


Thanks to your hard work, many kayakers will be able to enjoy doing the thing they love, kayaking the Leigh.


This is just a short note of support for the schedule of Lehigh River releases from the Francis E. Walter Dam. I love using the Lehigh River to kayak, and I very much appreciate all of your efforts toward this plan. I am really excited about the release schedule for 2005. Thank you for all you've done to support this plan, and I am looking forward to taking advantage of the increased number of releases for 2005 and paddling the Lehigh River much more frequently.


I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your role in expanding the scheduled releases on the Lehigh River. The additional release dates along with the varying release levels will be a very positive thing for me personally as an avid whitewater paddler, and I believe for the businesses and tourism along the Lehigh River as well. I applaud your efforts.


Please know that I am delighted of the decision to increase the releases on the Lehigh. I am Commodore of the Mohawk Canoe Club that has over 250 members, many of whom are avid paddlers of the Lehigh.


Many thanks for your support of the planned dam releases on the Lehigh River. It will be great for us paddlers, as well as a boost for that region's economy.


I am writing to you to voice my support of the proposed 2005 release schedule from the FE Walter Dam.  The proposed 2005 whitewater release schedule for: May 7-8;14-15; 21-22; 28-29 June 4-5, 11-12; 18-19; 25-26 July 2-3; July 23-24 August 6-7; 20-21 September 3-4; 17-18 October 1-2 is very favorable to me and my family.

We live in Doylestown, PA and utilize the Lehigh River Valley for frequent recreational trips.  I have enjoyed the previous release schedule most recently as a private whitewater kayaker, but also as an employee of Pocono Whitewater in the years of 1985-1994.  Any increase the release schedule to support whitewater and fishing opportunities is a step in the right direction.


For 6 years, I lived in Bethlehem and am somewhat familiar with the Lehigh River. I also believe that the region is missing out on a 10's of millions of dollars of business if the lake was filled and cold water releases used to keep the water in the gorge (and further) cool enough to hold trout through the summer. I believe that the upper Delaware fishery brought in a BILLION dollars, but that may be off. The Lehigh River could be the single greatest flowing freshwater fishing destination in the Eastern United States. You'd be amazed to know what flyfishermen will do or go through to get into larger rising wild trout, and it is easily within Eastern PA's grasp with the Lehigh River. I live in Western PA now, but rest assured, if the Corp stores more cold water in the dam and uses it to keep the Lehigh cold, I'll be there with bells on, spending $$$.


I am writing to request your support of increased recreational water releases from Francis Walter dam on the Lehigh River. The proposed schedule set forth by the Army Corps and Pennsylvania Senator Stuart Greenleaf is as follows:

May 7-8; 14-15; 21-22; 28-29
June 4-5, 11-12; 18-19; 25-26
July 2-3; July 23-24 August 6-7; 20-21
September 3-4; 17-18
October 1-2

I live within a 45 minute drive of the Lehigh Gorge and attend several of the releases each year. When there is no water flowing on the Lehigh River many of we boaters travel to the Mongaup River just above Port Jervis, NY., which provides releases each weekend during the summer. It's not much of a river and a much longer drive, but we do it a few times each summer when nothing else is flowing. We inevitably need to stop for food, gas, etc on these trips. I believe that it would be wiser to keep these recreationists, along

with the money that we spend on food, gasoline and lodging, here in Pennsylvania. One has to agree that this would be an economic boon to the merchants within the Lehigh Park Corridor. It would also be wiser to have them driving closer distances and therefore keeping the air that we breathe that much cleaner. and saving energy in the process.


Thank you for planning releases with the paddling community in mind. We appreciate it.


I am writing to express my emphatic support for the newly developed Lehigh River management plan proposed by the Army Corps of Engineers for the FE Walter Dam. As an avid whitewater enthusiast, fisherman and outdoor lover, I have enjoyed the Lehigh River gorge on many levels for many years and believe that this proposed plan is an ideal compromise to suit the needs of the many people who enjoy the Lehigh River. Furthermore, having been employed on the Lehigh River as a river guide and being exposed to that business, I cannot emphasize enough how economically important the proposed thirty whitewater releases could be for the area. Dependable whitewater would serve as a continued draw to bring people not only to the park, but to the surrounding area, bringing much needed outside revenue to this region. For the sake of all involved, please do all that you can to support and implement this excellent plan for a treasured resource.


I just wanted to let you know that I support the Army Corps' new plan for water releases from the Francis E. Walter Dam.

The Lehigh River is an integral part of the lifeline of the D&L corridor and it's a lifesaver for me. Whether, I'm hiking, biking or cross- country skiing along the land trail or kayaking on the water trail, the Lehigh River is truly a life-giving force. I have closely followed the development of the Lehigh Valley Canoe Club's interest statement and carefully read the commentary regarding the pros and cons of the proposed releases. It appears that the releases would improve the water trail for kayakers and fish, alike!

Please give your support to the current proposed releases.


I read through the proposal for the study of releases this year. I thank all who are responsible for this effort. It looks like a well thought out plan which has my full support. As a private boater of the river for over twenty years, I feel confident to say that the increase of scheduled releases, combined with the 750-1000 cfs target, is very beneficial to the future of the Lehigh as a viable Whitewater Boating destination. The

500 cfs releases of the past, I feel have done much to tarnish the image of the Lehigh River to the boating community.

I also believe this will have a few environmental benefits as well. Namely for the target species of trout in the stream.


Thanks for making the decision to increase the number of releases this year at FEW dam. It will be great to be able to enjoy the river so much more.


I have just become aware of the proposed schedule of dam releases on the Lehigh River. I wish to express my support for this schedule, as well as my gratitude for all your actions in bring this schedule to fruition.


On behalf of the Lehigh River Stocking Association and Lehigh River Guides Association I want to express my gratitude to the Army Corps for holding this meeting last night to discuss new storage and flow management possibilities for the FEW.

It was a great pleasure to finally meet some you last night. I thoroughly enjoyed my conversation with Mr. Gerrard and Mr. Wacik, thank you for taking time to do so. Mr. Sauls I'm sorry our paths never crossed but I believe you talked with my guiding business partner.

From a fisherman's stand point I was a bit disappointed in the 2005 plan especially with the quantity of water to be stored and the target releases that were discussed. I think a lot of this is due in part to lack of information that may not have been available to the agencies in regards to what the fisherman conceive as "friendly" flows/releases.

Attached is what the fishing guides perceive as "friendly" flows for the Lehigh River. These flows discussed in the attachment are relative to the Lehighton USGS gauging station. It should be noted, base on our experience fishing the river that during average to above average years of precipitation the release from FEW contributes approximately half of the flow at the Lehighton Gauging stations. Therefore if FEW is releasing 500 cfs, on average the FLOW at Lehighton is approximately 1000 cfs (+/-).

Please review that attached and keep this information so that we may work on perfecting the release from FEW to be more fisherman friendly.

The group(s) I represent plan on putting more thought and information together on behalf of the fisherman. I first want to look at the data that has been placed on the website for this project. Upon our review I will submit a document that discusses the concerns and views for improving the trout fishery on the river.

I sincerely look forward to working together on this project. Thank you for all your time and effort in forming this working group to better enhance the recreational opportunities on the Lehigh River.


This is just a short note of support for the schedule of Lehigh River releases from the Francis E. Walter Dam. I really appreciate all of your efforts toward this plan, and I am very excited about the release schedule for 2005. Thank you for all you've done to support this plan, and I am looking forward to taking advantage of the increased number of releases for 2005 and paddling the Lehigh River much more frequently. Thank you again!


I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your role in expanding the scheduled releases on the Lehigh River. The additional release dates along with the varying release levels will be a very positive thing for me personally as an avid whitewater paddler, and I believe for the businesses and tourism along the Lehigh River as well. I applaud your efforts.


  I wanted to thank you for your role in setting up the dates for this season's dam release. The dates will allow my family to get the most enjoyment paddling on the river in a more natural state.


This is a brief note of thanks for your actions regarding the proposed plan for recreational water releases on the Lehigh this season. Your efforts are greatly appreciated not only by myself, but also by my many whitewater paddling colleagues who frequent & enjoy the Lehigh River.


I would like to thank all those involved in getting more recreational releases on the Lehigh River. I'm looking forward to bringing more of my canoeing and kayaking friends from NY to enjoy this wonderful resource more than twice a year for guaranteed water. Typically we will spend the weekend paddling the different sections of the Lehigh and then enjoying the hospitality of the local restaurants, camping, lodging facilities and wonderful shops in the area.


I am writing in regard to proposal for additional recreational releases from the FE Walter Dam.

I would like to say that, as an avid paddler, I welcome this proposal enthusiastically! Not only will the additional releases enable paddlers to enjoy the scenery and challenge of the Lehigh River Gorge more often, but it should also have a positive impact on that region's retail stores and restaurants in terms of tourism dollars.

I'm glad that the Dam can finally be utilized for recreational enhancement as well as flood control.

I look forward to enjoying the river with my family and friends. The extra water in warmer months will help me to get my children into paddling as well.


 Thank you for your proposal to provide paddlers an enhanced release schedule for the 2005 season. While the flows are not optimal for paddlers, we understand you must reach a balance between all the stakeholders and the proposal seems a reasonable compromise at this stage. I understand the fishermen have registered some complaints about the new flows and hope they, too, will see that we cannot all get the optimal conditions for our personal use of the river. From a practical standpoint, the proposed spring flows do not seem that much altered from a normal year's flows, so I am somewhat confused by the fishermen's apparent objections. The big difference seems to be in mid summer when paddlers will get 2 weekends per month and the fishermen will get 2 weekends. That seems like an appropriate balance for those months. Thanks again.


I want to thank you, personally for the decision to increase the water releases for the Lehigh River. I am currently the Commodore of the Mohawk Canoe Club and we have over 250 enthusiastic paddlers as members. Many of them love the Lehigh. When we paddle there, we buy food, gas and some stay overnight. We think we are an asset to the community. We are also careful of our river environment and leave the river a cleaner place than we found it!

We are grateful for this decision and want you to know of my personal support and that of the club members also.


I am a member of the Lehigh Valley Canoe Club and regularly kayak on the Lehigh River. As a concerned user of the river I have been following the proposed release schedule revisions. I would like to thank you for considering the boaters in preparing the new schedule. Kayaking is a growing sport that is being enjoyed by so many people in our area. I think the increased release dates will be a huge benefit to the river users and the businesses in the area. I look forward to being on the river with many others during the upcoming release weekends.


I recently visited your website and was excited about your 2005 release date schedule. I am a whitewater kayaker and I plan to travel to the Lehigh River a lot more this spring/summer to take advantage of the flow. I appreciate your consideration in opening up more dates for 2005. We have a few young enlisted men who are interested in kayaking and I have spread the word so they can have the opportunity to take advantage of this Pennsylvania "gem" while they are stationed at Carlisle Barracks.


As President of the Conewago Canoe Club of York county, I would like to express my support for the 2005 dam release schedule for the Lehigh River. The Lehigh River is a favorite canoe and kayak destination of our 300+ members, and we are very pleased to see the number of weekend releases planned for the coming year.  

Thank you for taking the needs of the paddling community into account in making your decision. This will make a significant and positive difference in our club's summer recreational activities, and we greatly appreciate your efforts on our behalf.


I would like to thank you for your efforts in increasing the number of releases this year. I know this was not an easy process but I'm sure you'll find the results to the community and the watershed well worth it. As an environmental consultant for the last 20 years I've found that more users (not abusers) can result in a greater demand for better quality water which is what we all want, both fisherman and boaters (I'm both).

Keep up the good work.


Many thanks for your support on the planned releases on the Lehigh River. As paddlers and nature lovers, we are very grateful.


 Thank you very much for your efforts in improving the utilization of the Lehigh River and FE Walter Dam this year. I am a whitewater kayaker, still relatively new to the sport, and I thoroughly enjoyed my days on the Lehigh last summer. It really is a wonderful river for a broad cross-section of boaters, from beginners to experts. The only probably is we can't get enough of it! But your newly proposed schedule of releases will allow more people more chances to enjoy the river. I am very excited about the season now.  

Anyway, I figured you hear enough complaints from the various groups who use the lake or river, and wanted to let you know that your willingness to work with the constituents and find a workable solution for everyone is very much appreciated.


I am writing to support the recent proposal to release water in the Francis E. Walter Dam in a flow management plan. I will benefit this decision and as a taxpayer I and as a taxpayer I thank you.


A quick note of thanks for your collective efforts (in conjunction with the Lehigh Lovers United) in developing the new release schedule for the F. E. Walter Dam. The Lehigh Gorge is a great natural resource and the new schedule will allow more people to enjoy it. I frequently paddle several sections of the Lehigh and am looking forward to this spring and summer.


Just a short word of thanks & gratitude for the 30 release days that are scheduled in May, June, July, August, September, and October 2005 that fits most of the needs of the paddling public.


Hello I am a canoer and outdoor enthusiast,

On Thursday, February 24, the Army Corps came up with a proposal that fits most of the needs of the paddling public, and most of the needs of all the other interest groups. Now the time has come to support this plan and see it implemented!

Thank you for your effort in making this plan happen.


I would like to thank you for all your courtesy, time and diligence that was put into the improvement of the dam and water releases. I'm sure it will benefit many entities such as businesses, pleasure, etc. It can only get better from this point on. Whitewater paddlers won't have to leave the area to enjoy class III to IV water.


I want to thank you for the progress being made toward the additional spring releases from the F.E.W. dam. The Lehigh is a wonderful resource, and these releases will make it much more accessible to the boating community. Thank you for hearing us, and for your response.


 Hello - I am a long time canoeist and have paddle the Lehigh River numerous times over the past 20 years. It is a beautiful gorge and I have often wondered how wonderful it would be to do it more often. The Lehigh River was the first "white water river" my now 15-year-old son paddled in his kayak. In fact, over the years he has paddled the Lehigh River countless times and it honed his kayaking skills. Today at 15, he is one of the top kayak junior slalom racers in the world. I firmly believe the countless hours he spent on the Lehigh River when he was young, has helped him develop his slalom skills to what they are today. I am so pleased to hear that having more releases is being considered. Not only is it wonderful for the paddling community, it is wonderful for the economics of the area. Paddlers like to eat and they often frequent the local restaurants after paddling the river (I know we have!). They also stay at nearby hotels and campgrounds, and shop in the local shops. Thank you for consideration of having more releases. Spending the day canoeing on the Lehigh is a great way to spend a day!!


We understand that the Corps of Engineers plans to increase the number of whitewater releases on the Lehigh River below the Francis E. Walter Dam and also plans to increase low flow levels in order to enhance the fishery. The Garden State Canoe Club is pleased with this news and supports this effort.

Many of our members look forward to enjoying the Lehigh River each year. It is the premiere whitewater river within reasonable driving range for many of us. Your plans to increase the number of whitewater releases is strongly supported by our club.


Based on the data that I have acquired on the positive impact on the fishery and riparian environmental issues having been appropriately addressed, I fully support the proposed modifications in the Dam Release schedules.


I wanted to send you a quick note to thank you for your efforts to allow releases during the summer. My son and I usually have to go to Western Pennsylvania or West Virginia for summer paddling. It will be great to enjoy whitewater in the summer so close by!

I'm sure the local area will see a positive economic impact from your work as thousands of paddlers spend time in and around the Lehigh this summer.

The Army Corp of Engineers does great work that unfortunately most people take for granted. My son and I sure look forward to paddling the Lehigh most weekends this summer and thank you and the Corps for your hard work!


You're the guy we call when we want to know the river level of the Lehigh. I just want to say thank you for being so kind and available with that information. Also, I heard that the Lehigh may have releases in the summer. Fantastic news! My husband and I love to paddle the Lehigh and are ecstatic that there may be summertime paddling on the Lehigh. The Lehigh is a lovely river. We love paddling it and we try to patronize the local businesses in the area, such as restaurants and shops to show our gratitude to having access to such a wonderful place.

Also, if you would ever like a lesson in kayaking, let me know. We can always meet ya on a calm stretch of the Delaware or Schuylkill or our local favorite, the Brandywine. I don't know if you whitewater paddle, but if you'd like to give it a try, just let us know. Then you'll get as excited as we do when you hear about summertime releases on the Lehigh!


I have just heard the exciting news about the proposed 2005 whitewater release schedule. I am writing you to applaud your efforts and the actions taken in making this happen. My family has been coming to the Lehigh gorge state park for last sixteen years and are property owners in carbon county. The Lehigh river is were I developed a passion for the outdoors especially whitewater. This passion has lead me threw both the East and west coast of the united states and to seven countries around the world working full time in the outdoor industry in my teens and early twenties. Threw my travels I have gained and passed on many incredible experiences and crucial life changing events that may not have happened if not for those early years spent on the Lehigh. Once again thank you so much!! you have made my year. I look forward to teaching my seven year old daughter the joys of whitewater this summer on one of those hot summer weekend releases.


What a fantastic schedule! The Army Corps of Engineers should be congratulated for being such a responsive organization, willing to meet the needs of the recreational community (fishing, paddling..). I would personally like to thank you for hard work in creating a schedule that will improve the whitewater and economic opportunities of the Lehigh Valley. I look forward to paddling the river more often and enjoying its scenic beauty.


I am writing to support the Dam release proposal discussed at the meeting at Split Rock.


I'm writing to thank you all for the wonderful proposed management plan for the Lehigh River. I've spoken with Ms. Tingle and Mr. Cook over the years always about release level information. I'm delighted to hear this great news about the higher release levels and the higher frequency of the releases.

 I've paddled the Lehigh from above the lake all the way to the Delaware past the spellbinding Bethlehem monoliths. We paddled from White Haven to Rockport as recently as a few weeks ago with ice crystals dangling on the shore. My many paddling friends and I have thousands of pictures of paddling on the Lehigh to treasure in our old age showing all the fun we've had. I especially cherish the time my youngest son, age 35, followed me and friends through No Way in my old Prijon Cyclone. He still talks about it with hairs raised.

Simply put, and keeping it as brief as possible, I love the Lehigh and pray for continued enjoyment for us all in the best manner possible. So many river resources in the world are threatened today, we are so blessed to have this river so close to home in such a pristine condition.


I'm writing this note in support of your efforts to come forth with a proposal that makes a lot of sense for the region. I am a resident of Carbon County, and live 100 feet from the Army Corps levee in Weissport, PA. I was impressed with how the Corps managed the flows in order to successfully limit damages from the remnants of Hurricane Ivan. As a resident of the flood plain I take a more keen interest in dam operations at Walter than most people.

I also run Northeast PA Kayak School, a whitewater kayaking school utilizing the Lehigh River as the main course in a carefully constructed program of instruction. Higher summertime flows will not impact what I do very much, as I spend my time between Jim Thorpe and Bowmanstown, but I certainly can see the benefits what you're proposing.

The Lehigh has been where I've made my living for almost 23 years. As a kayak instructor I am on the river 180 days per year. I see the ebb and flow of seasons, the effect of drought, of high water, and of water-borne pollutants. Over the past six years I have seen the proliferation of driftboat fishing on the Lehigh - those folks are landing some big fish! There are dozens of Great Blue Herons nesting... 7 or 8 years ago there were few if any. The river is cleaner and better than ever before. Careful management of the resource in the Lake will allow the entire watershed to enjoy the benefits of better-managed flows and only improved water conditions.

This entire area relies on the Lehigh River for a significant portion of the economy. Your proposal appears to carefully consider all users and interest parties. Studies in the late 1980's on the Savage River in Maryland proved that water releases actual improve a downstream fishery. This will no doubt be the future of the Lehigh River. The rather subtle, but more frequent release schedule will serve the river system well - ecologically and economically.

So take this note as a vote of confidence. The economic impact on the area will be huge. The ecological impact will be positive. Your maintenance of higher minimum flows will serve only to improve the quality of the Lehigh's water in the Valley. The higher pool level will allow for increased fishing grounds within the Lake.

Thank you for efforts and thank all of your Army Corps colleagues. Time will show that your proposal was "watershed moment" in the development of a great fishery, a large influx of tourist dollars, and a booming local economy.


I am writing to express my support for the flow management plan unveiled by the USACE at the February 24, 2005 informational session. The Lehigh is such a beautiful and fun river, the paddling community is very excited about the prospect of having more frequent releases.

Thank you for considering the interests of boaters in your plan.


We support the Corps of Engineers' proposal on the releases as stated at the meeting on Feb. 24 at Split Rock.

 We feel this is best for the overall health of the river.


This message is to indicate my support for the dam releases you have scheduled for the coming season on the Lehigh River. As a fisherman and boater, I believe the releases will be beneficial to both.


I am a whitewater kayaker from Philadelphia. I was thrilled to see that the Corps of Engineers is considering increasing both the number and volumes of releases on the Lehigh this year. The Lehigh River is the only class II & III whitewater within close proximity to the Philadelphia area. Whitewater sports are gaining participants every year and the Corps release plans recognizing that fact are greatly appreciated.

Thank you for recognizing the public interest in whitewater sports.


I would like to add my support to the proposed am releases on the Lehigh this season.


I am a paddler with the Wilmington Trail Club. In regard to the proposal of May and June releases, I would like to thank you on behalf of my club and the many people enjoy the Lehigh River. We are looking for a wonderful summer in PA.


I just wanted to take this opportunity to express my excitement over the new proposed dam release schedule for the Lehigh River. I have enjoyed boating on the Lehigh for many years now. I feel that these releases will serve to make boating safer for all as there are fewer obstructions in the river when the water level is higher.


I would like to thank you for the wonderful news regarding the Lehigh releases for this coming year. As a whitewater kayak instructor for both the Philadelphia Canoe Club and the Wilmington Trail Club in Delaware, the Lehigh is a wonderful river with many features for a safe and fun training environment. By having more releases, the paddling clubs will be able to have many more trips for the novice paddlers so they can advance their skills with supervision. Also, the Lehigh is a just beautiful scenic river for a day out on the water for ANY type of paddler. I would also like to mention that after a day on the river most paddlers support the local restaurants in the area.


I just read the presentation from the meeting at Split Rock on February, 24. I wanted to thank you for the additional whitewater release dates. Could I be added to a distribution list for notification about any additional meetings?


I am writing to support the Dam release proposal discussed at the meeting at Split Rock.


I am a paddler who uses the Lehigh River. I am happy to learn that this year's release schedule has many more releases planned than in years past. I look forward to paddling the Lehigh many times this boating season. Thank you for your efforts.


I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate the work you are doing to help initiate more releases on the Lehigh. I am an avid whitewater kayaker, and I will take full advantage of increased releases on the Lehigh. I was on the river 77 times last year and am shooting for the century mark this year, and any added releases on the Lehigh will put me on the river that many more times.


I wanted to let you know that I fully support the new Dam Release schedule and that I think this will be a very positive step in the right direction to preserve and increase the level of tourism to our area. As you know, this is a vital income to many residents of Carbon, Monroe and Schuylkill counties.

I have guided on the Lehigh River for since 1986, before it was a Sate Park. I supported the Park because I knew it was the only way to preserve what we had. I know it took a long time for this type of release schedule to be possible, but I feel that this is a very positive second step in improving what we already have. I know that this will help the local economy and offer more safer and enjoyable water levels for all to enjoy.

I am also aware of the protests of the fishermen and I understand their point. However, there are many rivers and streams for fishing the local area, and only one Whitewater River, the Lehigh.

Thank you for all of your hard work and efforts in the past to maintain a pleasurable experience on the Lehigh, and I look forward to many more.


I am a paddler with an interest in the Lehigh River and I without reservation support the proposed release schedule.

I appreciate the Corp's efforts to increase the recreational utilization of the Lehigh.


Let me say amen and halleluiah. This was a long time coming. As a kayaker and sometimes guide this is great! The Lehigh is a great learning river and up to now it's potential has been underutilized. I applaud all of you for this decision against what I'm sure was vocal opposition. This is good not just for boaters but also the surrounding communities that will benefit from increased tourism dollars.


I am an avid kayaker as well as a guide for Pocono Whitewater. I would just like to express my approval and excitement for the potential increase in dam release days for this spring, summer, and fall. I expect that all environmental effects have been anticipated and that the only great change that will be seen will be on the river in the great enjoyment of the boaters and rafting patrons. Thanks for your consideration.


I will be paddling and supporting the release schedule whether working for Pocono White Water as an outfitter guide or private boating!


I am a boater and guide on the Lehigh for Pocono Whitewater. Thank you for making the changes to the dam release schedule for the Lehigh. These changes will make the river and season so much more enjoyable. I guide every Saturday and Sunday from April through October. Thank you.


Just a note to let you guys know how much we appreciate your extending the dam release schedule. Rafting the Lehigh Gorge is one of the best things to do in our area, especially in the summertime. Thanks for your work in making it available. See you on the river?


I am writing in support of the newly proposed management plan which provides for increased whitewater releases. I have paddled the sections below the dam on numerous occasions for recreational purposes with the Kayak and Canoe Club of New York. I have also helped with instructional programs run by the Appalachian Mountain Club on the Lehigh, and have taken instructional courses there with my wife and with my grandson, who is a Pennsylvania resident. In addition, my wife, my daughter (a PA resident), and her two children have taken raft trips on the Lehigh.  

The additional releases will help all of us make better use of the river, by providing more opportunities for myself, my family, and my paddling clubs. It will also be helpful in coordinating schedules with the non-paddlers in the family, who can be riding their bicycles on the trail above the Gorge while we paddle.

Naturally, while we are there, we always find time to dine in local restaurants, and often camp in local campsites, and shop in towns such as Jim Thorpe.

My entire extended family is looking forward to taking advantage of the additional releases this year, and hope that they will become a permanent fixture.


I am a concerned citizen for the environment and do all that I can to help our environment from recycling, to practicing "pack it out / leave no trace" when camping. However even I can not find any reason why your whitewater release program plan proposed for 2005 would be cause for alarm amongst certain animal rights groups claiming this program may inhibit fish spawning. I can find NO detriment to the fish caused by non-motorized craft, and therefore I can not support these groups and their claims the fish will be harmed by your release program. So I am writing to you and your agency to show my support of your whitewater release program proposed for 2005. Thank you very much on behalf of all kayak and canoe aficionados!


I am sending this note to express my appreciation for your consideration of the needs of the Lehigh Valley whitewater paddling community in the formulation of your proposed 2005 release schedule.

The May and June releases are especially important to Lehigh River paddlers.

Your efforts are much appreciated.


I am writing in full support of the following dam releases that have been scheduled:

Every weekend in May & June

July 2 & 3
July 23 & 24
Aug. 6 & 7
Aug. 20 & 21
Sept. 3 & 4
Sept. 17 & 18
Oct. 1 & 2


This is just to let you know at the Army Corp of Engineers that I support this schedule. Thank You!


I operate The Inn at Jim Thorpe a restored 45 room hotel in the town in Jim Thorpe. After hearing about the proposed new water release dates for the Lehigh River, I would like to voice my support. This new action will have a tremendous positive impact on ours as well other businesses in this area of Carbon County.

From what I understand, there is possible negative impact on fishing in the lake above the dam. But at the same time a positive effect on fishing in the river from the proposed actions.

I feel that the tremendous benefits of this action to our area far outweigh the possible negative effects. I urge you to follow through on the proposed new release dates.


I am writing to you in regard to the water releases that you are looking to do in May & June of this year. I am very excited about the decision and hope that others are as well. I just wanted to let you know that the efforts the Army Corp of Engineers have put forth are much appreciated. Have a great day!


Water storage and damn releases in the summer - I am getting my sunscreen ready right now.


This really is great - for me personally and for all of the people who want the fun of whitewater but can't take the cold of April.

Yeah!


First I would like to thank you and the rest of the Army Corps of Engineers for your hard work in getting these release dates to materialize. This will be my fourth season as a commercial guide on the Lehigh, and I whole-heartedly support the new summer release dates. The ideal of having extra release dates during the summer is very exciting. Aside from being exciting for guides and private boaters...these dates represent the opportunity for economic gain for the outfitters and businesses in the area. As we all know this prospect is openly welcome by many! Every year the Poconos faces more competition from surrounding recreational areas in WV, NY, and MA. These dates will ensure folks find the whitewater here in northeast PA!

Please continue to do your much appreciated work to make and keep these release dates. Thank you for your time.


This is a note to let you know that I support the new 2005 water release schedule for the Lehigh River in Pennsylvania. As a kayaker and a naturalist I find this a "win-win" situation for not only downstream recreation, downstream water quality for fish habitat and for an increase in the fishery above the dam.


I wanted to show my support for the new dam release schedule. This has the potently to do so many great things for this area in terms of economics and recreation. It will not only provide income for local workers, businesses and NPS, among others. It will also provide the opportunity for a great number of people to explore and enjoy the Lehigh gorge.

 

I know a lot of hard work and negotiation went on to make this possible. Thank you for all that you have done to make the releases possible.


I just wanted to let you know that I support the new 2005 water release schedule as proposed on the Lehigh River. You did a great job.


I am VERY much in favor of the new dam release schedule.

This schedule would allow whitewater boating and rafting on the Lehigh throughout the entire season. Your efforts in this endeavor will open the Lehigh to its full potential.

The people of the surrounding area will now be able to fully enjoy a magnificently scenic gorge all season long.


I wanted to thank you for your help in securing the new water release schedule from Francis Walters. This has the potential for an enormous positive economic input on the local area. A local area which is one of the more depressed in the state with one of the highest unemployment rates.

The potential increase in boaters and fishermen will bring jobs and revenue to the area. Hotels, restaurants, shops, outfitters, and local taxing bodies such as school districts will all benefit. Carbon County has one of the older average ages in the state, a state which itself has one of the oldest average ages nationwide. Young people leave because there are no jobs. Problems like the new release schedule are very positive economic developments steps towards changing that equation.


I am encouraged by this initial effort at a management flow plan for the FEW reservoir and the proposed 250 cfs minimum conservation releases for July and August. These releases should help enhance the wild trout fishery that exists on the river and increase the number of holdover trout in the river. I would encourage the committee to look at the possibility of releasing a 250 cfs minimum on any given day when thermal stress may be lethal for trout.

However, it was obvious from the remarks at the kick-off meeting, that the emphasis was on whitewater opportunities. A 750 - 1000 cfs release scheduled for every weekend in May through the weekend of June 4-5 and a 750 cfs release scheduled for the rest of the weekends through June will prohibit anglers from utilizing the resource on all weekends during this time period which is considered prime for fishing. The river cannot be waded at 750 cfs. The committee may want to revisit this schedule to accommodate the over one million anglers in Pennsylvania who buy licenses, equipment, gasoline, food and lodging and have just as much passion for and right to enjoy their sport as anyone else.

There was much talk about balancing the needs of all users. I urge the committee to balance the release schedule for May and early June to accommodate both whitewater enthusiasts and anglers. Anglers have a huge impact on the economy, something I am sure the PF&BC can attest to. Also, emphasize that the Lehigh River already is a wild trout fishery. Certainly, more cold water will enhance that if released at the proper time.


Thank you for opening the Leigh to kayaking every weekend in May and June.


Please consider expanding the number of water releases on the Lehigh River as a winning situation for all parties involved. The commercial recreational companies benefit, the private boaters and float fisherman are happy, and the local businesses and campgrounds also benefit. Thank you for considering this option and have a good day.


I'm a hillbilly from Arkansas that visited the Poconos & the Lehigh River Gorge for my 1st time when I was a young buck. I still enjoy

floatin' & fishin' on the Lehigh River below the Francis E. Walter dam. I fully support the proposed 2005 whitewater release schedule of:

May 7-8; 14-15; 21-22; 28-29
June 4-5, 11-12; 18-19; 25-26
July 2-3; July 23-24
August 6-7; 20-21
September 3-4; 17-18
October 1-2


As a Pennsylvania resident and avid whitewater kayaker, I was very pleased to see that the release schedule for WE Walter Dam for 2005 has been significantly expanded. I was also pleased to see that the target release levels are higher than have typically been available in past years. The additional flow definitely makes for a more enjoyable whitewater experience.

As a result of these changes, I will certainly be traveling to the White Haven area more frequently than I have in the past to take advantage of the Lehigh River's whitewater opportunities, particularly in the dry summer months when PA whitewater is difficult to find.

I offer my thanks to the USACE and the other parties involved for considering the interests of whitewater boaters in the recent changes to the flow schedule for FE Walter Dam.


 I would like to thank all those involved in getting more recreational releases on the Lehigh River. I'm looking forward to bringing more of my canoeing and kayaking friends from NY to enjoy this wonderful resource more than twice a year for guaranteed water. Typically we will spend the weekend paddling the different sections of the Lehigh and then enjoying the hospitality of the local restaurants, camping, lodging facilities and wonderful shops in the area.


I support the proposal of 30 Lehigh River releases of 750-1000 cfs for the year 2005. I have kayaked, guided rafts, and taught since 1980 on this beautiful piece of water. I am thrilled to see safety finally being taken into consideration. It is unsafe to run trips less than 700 cfs on this river. Over the years, I have seen many elbow, shin, shoulder dislocations, and head injuries due to the constant bumping against the smaller rocks which are present at low levels. Additionally, the river is much more fun at 1000 CFS, and you will see the industry (and local economy) grow, particularly if local accommodations such as parking is not too difficult or expensive. The past habit of releasing large volumes of water at night time or during the week days was simply mean spirited and a true waste of natural resources from the perspective of a boater. I strongly commend you for getting to this point in the discussion, and support the adoption of these proposed more numerous, safer and more fun release levels.


Although we currently live in West Virginia my wife and I spent many years in the Philadelphia suburbs. We are both whitewater paddlers, and we ran the Lehigh River often. This stream is one of the best intermediate whitewater runs in Eastern Pennsylvania and has been a popular destination for paddlers since the 1950's. We look forward to the day when we can return and paddle it again.

We are both very excited to hear about the proposed water release schedule that was unveiled in your February 24th public meeting. The significant increase in the number of scheduled whitewater releases will be a huge attraction for canoe, kayak, and rafting enthusiasts from New York to Washington and will, I think, provide a significant economic boost to the area. The Corps is to be commended for bringing together diverse interests and creating a plan that offers significant benefits for paddlers, fishermen, and the ecology of the river.


This is just a short note to inform you how important I find the proposed releases on the Lehigh River. As a paddler the resource of the Lehigh is invaluable. Thank you for all of your work to make this possible


I am a whitewater paddler that regularly paddles the Lehigh River below the Francis E. Walter dam. I vote in every election and am active in several organized paddling/environmental organizations. I understand that due to the relocation of a low-lying road on the upstream face of the dam, that there is now additional storage capacity, giving you the flexibility to store and release water for recreational white water releases more frequently.

I applaud this course and encourage you continue. If there was more dependable water on the Lehigh it will bring a lot of paddlers to the area. Those paddlers will then help revitalize the economy of that area by staying in local lodging, eating in local restaurants and buying from local store owners. That in turn will increase other services businesses and suppliers.

Additionally it will allow the river to be enjoyed by many more then it currently does. Because of its proximity to NY and Philadelphia, many people will be able to experience a rafting or canoe trip that would other wise maybe never get a chance.

This would be a huge benefit for both the local area and whitewater paddlers along the northeast.


I am writing in support of the proposed dam release schedule for 2005 that was presented by the army corps of engineers on Feb. 24.

As a whitewater kayaker, I believe that additional weekend releases will bring increased revenue to the area, bring many fisherpeople and boaters joy, and that this will not interfere with the Corps management of water flow.

As one who watches the gauges, I can not tell you how frustrating it is for boaters to see large volume releases during the weekdays, only to find a trickle running on the weekend. It seems counterproductive for both the environment (enjoyment of the river motivates people to want to preserve the river valley), for local business interests, and for our citizens optimal enjoyment of what few natural resources we have in this country.


I am writing to express my support for the flow management plan unveiled by the USACE at the February 24, 2005 informational session.

The Lehigh is such a beautiful and fun river, the paddling community is very excited about the prospect of having more frequent releases.

Thank you for considering the interests of boaters in your plan.


I am in support of your plan for this season! Thank you from my paddling (kayak) family


I wanted to take a minute and thank you for increasing the number of Lehigh River Releases for 2005. I've been kayaking for the last decade and have spent many weekends driving to Ohiopyle, PA and beyond to kayak. It will be great to spend more time near home and enjoy the beautiful Lehigh River Gorge.

Also our newly found whitewater club, Lehigh Valley Whitewater, Inc., is in the midst of scheduling several trips and paddle events for this upcoming season. In the past, we would have been forced to hold Safety classes and other paddling events on the Delaware River. I can not express how happy we are to have other alternatives.

Finally, I fully expect these more frequent releases to financially help the local small towns like Jim Thorpe, Lehighton, Weatherly and Whitehaven. I was born and raised in Lehighton and I hate to see towns like that deteriorate. Good job and keep it up!


As a canoeist, I strongly support the proposed release schedule for the

Francis Walter Dam. Not only is it environmentally friendly, it will augment economics in the area. Paddlers spend money wherever they are. Food, Camping supplies, lodging, etc. And Whitewater paddlers rarely leave behind any trash. They usually pick it up.


Your website has dates for dam releases on the Lehigh for 2004. Are 2005 dates available? Please tell me the dates of those releases, or provide me a link to where they are on the web. Thank you.


A quick note of thanks for your collective efforts (in conjunction with the Lehigh Lovers United) in developing the new release schedule for the F. E. Walter Dam . The Lehigh Gorge is a great natural resource and the new schedule will allow more people to enjoy it. I frequently paddle several sections of the Lehigh and am looking forward to this spring and summer.


I would like to thank you for all your courtesy, time and diligence that was put into the improvement of the dam and water releases. I'm sure it will benefit many entities such as businesses, pleasure, etc. It can only get better from this point on. Whitewater paddlers won't have to leave the area to enjoy class III to IV water.


I was delighted to see the new 2005 Lehigh release schedule for the Francis E. Walther Dam. This is a boon to whitewater sports of all kinds in this area. This is the first time in history that we have a reliable whitewater river within day-trip range of the New York/NJ and PA metropolitan areas.


I am a member of KCCNY and also a kayak instructor. In addition to my own paddling and club trips, we plan to use the Lehigh regularly for training. Therefore, my personal intent is to use the river as much as possible this summer and take advantage of the new opportunities now available to paddlers.


We use the Lehigh gorge, and the lower section for training.

Thanks for creating this new opportunity for us

See you on the river.


I was very pleased to learn of the plan for expanded whitewater releases from the Frances E. Walter Dam. For avid paddlers like me, the Lehigh River is a wonderful resource, and I strongly support the proposed new management plan from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Many thanks.


I am a New Jersey resident who paddles the Lehigh River a number of times each year. The proposed management plan would allow me to use the river even more often while enhancing the ecological viability of the river. I wholly support the proposed 2005 release schedule.


This is a note of support and thanks for your efforts regarding the release plan on the Lehigh River. My friends who paddle whitewater & I enjoy coming to this beautiful area in PA quite frequently.

We do not take the releases for granted. The access is extremely important to us & we are grateful. Thanks again for whatever part you have played in support of this plan.


I heard that you were looking for input about public recreation on the Lehigh river .  There is a new book out titled Waterfalls of the Mid-Atlantic States by Gary Letcher. He listed Lehigh Gorge State Park for the waterfalls and hiking-however I couldn't find a good listing on the state parks website for directions to the falls. Maybe you could elaborate on the recreational aspects of viewing the waterfall for those who visit the Lehigh gorge state park as part of your policy to enhance recreational activities. 


I understand that the Corps of Engineers is considering increasing the number of releases suitable for whitewater paddling from the Walter Dam.  

I am writing to strongly support this plan.

I am an avid paddler who has greatly enjoyed the recreational opportunities afforded by these releases. The fact that I live four hours away from the river, yet am ready to make the trip for the opportunity it provides, is testament to my interest. I would think that the hundreds of other paddlers similarly inclined, many of whom come from equal or greater distance, would provide an additional economic incentive to the region for this plan.

I hope you will give it careful consideration, and I hope it is adopted.


I would like to thank you for your efforts in increasing the number of releases this year. I know this was not an easy process but I'm sure you'll find the results to the community and the watershed well worth it. As an environmental consultant for the last 20 years I've found that more users (not abusers) can result in a greater demand for better quality water which is what we all want, both fisherman and boaters (I'm both).


I have been a dedicated paddler and outdoor person for most of my life, as well as being a member of local paddling clubs for many years. I enjoy recreational releases from Francis E. Walter Dam and support the proposed flow enhancement and increase in number of releases scheduled for 2005. The cooperative efforts of many people and groups are appreciated. We hope that climatic conditions will be agreeable and look forward to these and other additional boating opportunities on the Lehigh in years to come.

I'm also a resident living along another one of our local rivers. I'd like to add that I support and encourage recreational users of our waterways and the general public showing respect for the environment, toward other responsible people enjoying the river, and toward the residents of these areas who seek a quality way of life.


I just want to express my support for the Army Corps of Engineers proposed new release schedule for the Francis E. Walter Dam.

I started paddling the Lehigh River from White Haven to Rockport and Rockport to Jim Thorpe in kayak 28 years ago. Eventually, I was joined by wife, paddling together in C-2M (mixed doubles decked canoe) as we developed the skills that led to our winning the National Championship in whitewater slalom in C-2M in 1984. This past summer, I introduced our 12-year-old son to the Lehigh, who paddled the Upper Gorge in C-1 - his first Class III trip. We are all delighted to see that your proposed schedule significantly increases the number of releases, increasing the accessibility of this wonderful river to a larger number of interested paddlers.

We all hope that your proposed schedule meets with strong support and is implemented as planned.


I just received notice of the proposed release schedule on the Lehigh River for this summer. I think it is a great plan. Not only will I enjoy it as a kayaker, I know it will bring an influx of business to the towns along there. Not only will outfitters benefit; local restaurants, markets and gas stations will also. I applaud your initiative.


I just wanted to write and thank you for the 2005 water release schedule on the Lehigh. I've been kayaking for 3 years now, and have always enjoyed paddling the Lehigh. Thanks to your work I'll be out there a lot more than the last three years. I think the increase in the number of Lehigh releases will really be a great help to all the Delaware Valley paddling community.


I am a canoeist and whitewater kayaker who has enjoyed releases from the Francis Walter Dam over many years. I very much favor the Lehigh River Flow Management Plan unveiled by the Corps at its public meeting on February 24


Hello I am a canoer and outdoor enthusiast, On Thursday, February 24, the Army Corps came up with a proposal that fits most of the needs of the paddling public, and most of the needs of all the other interest groups. Now the time has come to support this plan and see it implemented!

Thank you for your effort in making this plan happen.


I am writing to express my support for the proposed increased release schedule at the FE Walters Dam. Although I am a resident of New Jersey, I frequently travel to the Lehigh River to kayak. I believe that the proposed release schedule is an excellent starting point, representing a good compromise of the various stakeholders' interests. In particular, the increased releases in the Spring and early Summer are a unique addition to the recreational opportunities available in the Lehigh Valley . Whitewater is a limited commodity, particularly during the summer months. With that in mind, I would suggest that additional releases be added later in the Summer, so long as water is available. Finally, I would like to thank the Corps for its work on this matter.


I am writing you to tell you of my support of the Corp's proposed 2005 whitewater release schedule on the Lehigh river . I am both a whitewater kayaker, riverguide and kayak instructor for Whitewater Challengers. I think this enhanced release schedule would be a great economic benefit for White Haven and the surrounding communities with the rafting business that would be generated when the public finds out there is whitewater rafting in the gorge in JULY!! (and not to mention the guide staff will be thrilled about whitewater opportunities in July as well).

Having additional whitewater releases later in the year will also provide ample opportunity for beginner kayakers to learn whitewater in a safer environ - hypothermia will be less of an issue (if at all) and a level of 750 CFS from the dam is a great teaching level - it's not too much water to make the river too "pushy", and not too little that people would have to "knuckle" themselves over shallow areas.

Again I would like to voice my support for these proposed releases.


As a regular paddler in this area, I would like to submit my support for the proposed update to the whitewater release schedule.


I wanted to send you a quick note to thank you for your efforts to allow releases during the summer. My son and I usually have to go to Western Pennsylvania or West Virginia for summer paddling. It will be great to enjoy whitewater in the summer so close by!

I'm sure the local area will see a positive economic impact from your work as thousands of paddlers spend time in and around the Lehigh this summer.

The Army Corp of Engineers does great work that unfortunately most people take for granted. My son and I sure look forward to paddling the Lehigh most weekends this summer and thank you and the Corp. for your hard work!


Thank you for increasing the volume to 750-1000 cfs on water release levels for this year. It will make boating more playful. Also thank you for increasing the number of releases. Looking forward to visiting the Lehigh more this year.


I wanted to thank you for your part in developing the proposal for 2005 management of the FE Walter Dam. My husband and I love kayaking the Lehigh River, and the schedule of release targets for this year is very exciting. The idea to vary the levels of releases is also a good one. Thanks again for your part in making paddle sports more accessible to more people in our area.


I am writing on behalf of the Conservation Committee of the Kayak and Canoe Club of New York (KCCNY). KCCNY is a regionally-based educational and recreational club with approximately 300 members in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Our club sponsors approximately 10 official trips on the Lehigh each year, and our message boards indicate that many of our members utilize the river regularly on "unofficial" trips. KCCNY has a strong interest in fostering recreational opportunities on the Lehigh, and we are well situated to see the many positive impacts that river releases offer to the local economy.

Accordingly, I am writing to express our club's strong support for the flow management plan unveiled by the USACE at the February 24, 2005 informational session. On behalf of the club, I would like to thank USACE for soliciting input from the boating community and incorporating that input in the flow management plan.

KCCNY looks forward to working with the USACE and other boating and recreational groups in order to ensure the success of recreation on the Lehigh River


I am writing to support the recent proposal to release water in the Francis E. Walter Dam in a flow management plan.


More frequent releases of water in the Lehigh river would be a great benefit to the canoeing and kayaking community. The Lehigh river above Jim Thorpe is extremely beautiful and a real gem for many living in the Philadelphia and New York City areas.


We are writing to support the request for additional releases on the Lehigh river .


I have become aware of the proposed whitewater release schedule on the Lehigh River for 2005 and am very supportive of the plan.

 The river is a wonderful experience and I welcome the opportunity to enjoy it more often. I would also imagine the local economy would benefit from the releases with increase prospect for sales of food, lodging, supplies, entertainment, gas (etc).


I am writing to express my support for the expanded whitewater release schedule from the Francis E. Walter dam. I am a Pennsylvania kayaker and look forward to having more opportunities to paddle this beautiful section of the Lehigh River. Whitewater boating is a great family sport. My two teenage children (both avid paddlers) join me in supporting the added releases.


We are whitewater paddlers and consider the Lehigh releases to be our favorite river trip east of the Mississippi.

We support the proposed release schedule and, along with members of our canoe club, will be making use of many of the releases. We usually camp at Hickory Run State and take many of our meals at restaurants in the White Haven and Jim Thorpe area.

Please make this new schedule official and permanent!


I am a paddler with the Wilmington Trail Club in Delaware. We paddle the Lehigh as often as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers schedules releases. So we are elated over the news that there are now 30 scheduled releases due to your hard work and efforts. Thanks to you we are anticipating a great season.


I am a paddler with an interest in the Lehigh River and I without reservation support the proposed release schedule.

I appreciate the Corp's efforts to increase the recreational utilization of the Lehigh.


I am a long-time whitewater paddler, and I am writing to express my support for the plan to increase both the number of releases and the size of the releases on the Lehigh River. Thank you for your consideration of this matter, and thank you for soliciting community input.


I am a whitewater paddler who strongly supports the proposed release schedule - I really like the idea.


I am a member of the Philadelphia Canoe Club, and have been following the debates about the flow management at the Francis Walter dam for the last several years.

I look forward to enjoying the warm waters of the Lehigh this summer as I bring my stepsons into the world of whitewater. Thank you in advance for the opportunity to teach them when the water and air temperatures will be at a safe level.


I am a paddler who uses the Lehigh River. I am happy to learn that this year's release schedule has many more releases planned than in years past. I look forward to paddling the Lehigh many times this boating season. Thank you for your efforts.


I am a kayak paddler, a former resident of Reading, PA and I learned to paddle on the Lehigh.

I strongly support increased scheduled releases and I plan to take advantage of this opportunity to bring my family down the Lehigh.

Please add me to your e-mailing list and confirm the following proposed 2005 whitewater release schedule:

May 7-8;14-15; 21-22; 28-29
June 4-5, 11-12; 18-19; 25-26
July 2-3; July 23-24
August 6-7; 20-21
September 3-4; 17-18
October 1-2


As a frequent visitor to the beautiful Lehigh River, I commend the US Army Corps of Engineers efforts to improve the recreational releases from the Francis E Walter Dam.


Thank you for your Dam Flow Plan, I support the regular water release. Will fish the river at low water and canoe it at high water. As a retired guy I'll enjoy it often . Thanks to you and F.D.R.s' Soc. Sec.


My wife and I and many of our friends are frequent paddlers of the Lehigh Gorge and we are very excited that an effort is being made to continue and enhance the white water release schedule for this beautiful river. We completely support this effort and encourage any support related to making this proposal permanent. With that said, please know that we also feel the need to always keep an open mind and a watchful eye on the impact that these events have on the environmental qualities of this beautiful gorge.


Hello - I am a long time canoeist and have paddle the Lehigh River numerous times over the past 20 years. It is a beautiful gorge and I have often wondered how wonderful it would be to do it more often. The Lehigh River was the first "white water river" my now 15-year-old son paddled in his kayak. In fact, over the years he has paddled the Lehigh River countless times and it honed his kayaking skills. Today at 15, he is one of the top kayak junior slalom racers in the world. I firmly believe the countless hours he spent on the Lehigh River when he was young, has helped him develop his slalom skills to what they are today. I am so pleased to hear that having more releases is being considered. Not only is it wonderful for the paddling community, it is wonderful for the economics of the area. Paddlers like to eat and they often frequent the local restaurants after paddling the river (I know we have!). They also stay at nearby hotels and campgrounds, and shop in the local shops. Thank you for consideration of having more releases. Spending the day canoeing on the Lehigh is a great way to spend a day!!


I am a paddler and I support the proposed release schedule on the Lehigh River. I also support the water flow to support the fish habitat and the overall health of the river. I paddle there often and believe that this is a jewel and I support improving the ecological and recreational benefits.


 I would like to comment on the management plan for 2005. First, the plan shows a genuine effort on the part of ACE, DCNR and others to improve recreational opportunities of everyone, fishermen and whitewater boaters.

However, I am a whitewater boater and a fisherman, and I believe that the plan benefits the fishermen more then the whitewater boaters.

My concerns are:

-There are no scheduled releases for April. April is considered to be a prime time for whitewater on the Lehigh. Only the Fishermen benefit in April while the whitewater boaters may be left high and dry.

-Five feet of pool is not much to work with in May and June. Releasing water during these months is very important to the whitewater boaters and these months are the easiest to secure since natural flows are the highest at this time of the year. Raising the pool to the maximum allowed for long term storage (15% or 1365.00) would provide much more water to work with, if the pool is allowed to fluctuate by only five feet. At 1365, five feet of pool is approx. three times the water compared to 1335. A pool of 1365 would help to secure recreational releases in May and June as well as the rest of the scheduled whitewater releases and the minimum 250 cfs for downstream fisheries enhancement throughout the season. Again, the fishermen benefit more with the spawning enhancement at FEW, the 5 days a week that the river will be low, and the minimum 250 cfs for downstream fisheries enhancement.

The whitewater boaters could loose releases in May and June since the pool will not be allowed to fluctuate more then five feet.

-I believe that the only way to secure releases without running out of water, under the 2005 plan of storing only 35 feet of extra water, is to change the policy/procedure concerning when the water in turned on and turned off. At the present time, releases are started at 4pm Friday and turned off around 2pm on Sunday, this is 46 hours of water being released. If you turn the water on at 2am and off at 2pm daily, the water will reach White Haven by 4 am , Rockport by 7:30am , and Glen Onoko by noon and will drop at White Haven at 4pm and Rockport at 7:30 pm . This allows whitewater boating through the entire Lehigh Gorge and as far as Bowmanstown, while saving 22 hours of water over a two day release. Yes, you may have to pay a little overtime, however when you take into consideration the benefits of saving 22 hours of water, it is well worth the investment.

The plan is a big step forward, however it does need some adjustments. I think that the whitewater community is willing to sacrifice the loss of releases in April in return for GUARANTEED releases in May and June. The loss of the May and June releases would have a huge impact on the boating community. The whitewater and spawning enhancement releases in July, August,

September and October are a great benefit to both the whitewater boaters and fishermen.


Just a short word of thanks & gratitude for the 30 release days that are scheduled in May, June, July, August, September, and October 2005 that fits most of the needs of the paddling public.


I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate the work you are doing to help initiate more releases on the Lehigh. I am an avid whitewater kayaker, and I will take full advantage of increased releases on the Lehigh.

I was on the river 77 times last year and am shooting for the century mark this year, and any added releases on the Lehigh will put me on the river that many more times.


Please count me as one of the many canoeists that would like to see the proposed increase in releases, and increased water flow for each, in the Lehigh River below the Francis Walter Dam.

I'm a 72 year old member of the Monocacy Canoe Club, based in Frederick, Maryland.

I've been canoeing the Lehigh Rv. since the late 1960's, and this river has always been a favorite. For many years I've paddled all of the releases each year for many years [except for the ones that get washed out].

The club, and I, are in favor of the USACE's plans for this beautiful river.


I am a peddler with the Wilmington Trail Club. In regard to the proposal of May and June releases, I would like to thank you on behalf of my club and the many people enjoy the Lehigh River. We are looking for a wonderful summer in PA.


As an avid paddler, fisherman, outdoor educator, and advisor to a college student outing club, I'd like to express to you my support for the proposed dam release schedule for the Francis E. Walter dam below the Lehigh River in Pennsylvania. Securing the future of our beautiful natural land and waterscapes while balancing the needs of a growing, and often encroaching, human population, and the recreational shareholders is a tricky balancing act. I believe that the proposed release schedule does an excellent job of balancing these needs, and I hope the proposed plan carries forth and becomes the plan implemented in 2005.


I just want to express my gratitude for your efforts in increasing the releases from Walter Dam.

I, and all of the 50 odd members of our Paddling club in Wilmington , Delaware will be grateful for more reliable whitewater flows on the river during the summer.

This is a recreational resource we all cherish.


I am a white water paddler and a member of the Philadelphia Canoe Club. I am writing today to thank you and the Corps of Engineers for all your hard work in getting more releases on the Lehigh River this year.

My fellow paddlers and I support the proposed schedule and appreciate the effort of the Corps in this endeavor.

If we can help the Corps in any way, please contact me.


Many of my fellow paddlers in the Lancaster County area would be very interested in more whitewater releases from the Francis E Walter Dam on the Lehigh River in northeastern PA. I support the proposed release schedule.


I just wanted to let you know that I support the Army Corps' new plan for water releases from the Francis E. Walter Dam.

The Lehigh River is an integral part of the lifeline of the D&L corridor and it's a lifeline for me. Whether I am hiking, biking or cross-country skiing along the land trail or kayaking on the water trail, the Lehigh River is truly a life-giving force. I have closely followed the development of the Lehigh Valley Canoe Club's interest statement and carefully read the commentary regarding the pros and cons of the proposed releases. It appears that the releases would improve the water trail for kayakers and fish, alike!

Please give your support to the current proposed releases.


We support the Corps of Engineers' proposal on the releases as stated at the meeting on Feb. 24 at Split Rock.

We feel this is best for the overall health of the river.


As a paddler and working in the professional academic setting teaching recreational skills including whitewater paddling, rescue, river reading, etc. I think that the availability of more entry level rivers is ideal to teach whitewater skills. The increased releases will aid the entire sport of whitewater paddling and teach lifelong recreation skills to future generations whether paddling or not.

I am emphatically supporting the new releases for education, environmental, and personal reasons.

At a public meeting on Feb. 24th the Corps unveiled their proposed management plan. It includes a five-fold increase in the number of whitewater releases in 2005: a total of 30 750-1000 CFS water releases between May and October as compared to seven 500-700 CFS releases in a normal year. They will also increase low-flow augmentation for fisheries enhancement by providing 50% more days with flows over 250 CFS, a level considered ideal for fishing.

This proposal is supported by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, the Delaware River Basin Commission, and the Lehigh Gorge State Park.

American Whitewater strongly supports these efforts also.


I am a whitewater paddler from the DC area. I visited the Lehigh for the first time last fall and thoroughly enjoyed my time on this beautiful and entertaining river. I would certainly enjoy visiting a few more times this year and would like to applaud the proposed expansion in whitewater release dates.


I am very happy that the Corps is generating these additional releases.


I am a paddler who loves paddling the Lehigh with my family.

I am in full support of increasing the number of Lehigh releases.


I recently visited your website and was excited about your 2005 release date schedule. I am a whitewater kayaker and I plan to travel to the Lehigh River a lot more this spring/summer to take advantage of the flow. I appreciate your consideration in opening up more dates for 2005. We have a few young enlisted men who are interested in kayaking and I have spread the word so they can have the opportunity to take advantage of this Pennsylvania "gem" while they are stationed at Carlisle Barracks.


As a kayak paddler, fisherman, and hiker along rivers, I support the proposed plan.


I have read the report for the new 2005 flow proposals regarding the Walter Dam and Lehigh River. Being both an avid trout fisherman and white water rafter I full support the changes.


 I am a boater and guide on the Lehigh for Pocono Whitewater. Thank you for making the changes to the dam release schedule for the Lehigh. These changes will make the river and season so much more enjoyable. I guide every Saturday and Sunday from April through October.


Just a note to let you guys know how much we appreciate your extending the dam release schedule. Rafting the Lehigh Gorge is one of the best things to do in our area, especially in the summertime. Thanks for your work in making it available. See you on the river?


We are whitewater as well as flat water paddlers who support the proposal of more recreational releases on the Lehigh. The more we can get on the river is more money spent in the state of PA. as we always make this a weekend affair. Thank you so much for making this a possibility.


I am a paddler who has enjoyed the Lehigh River for many years. The current limited release schedule often makes it difficult to find a day that will work with my schedule. The new proposed expanded schedule with releases of 750-1000 CFS would be great and provide many more opportunities for me and my friends to paddle. Thank you for your consideration.


Thank you very much for the proposed increase water releases for the 2005 season. As a whitewater paddler, fisherman and businessman, I can assure you that this will provide an excellent opportunity for both enjoyment of this great natural resource as well as provide enormous economic stimulation to area businesses.


Nice meeting with you both again last week at Split Rock. On behalf of LRSA, we are grateful for your work and are enthusiastic about collaborating further with ACE, Wildlands, PFBC and others on these changes at FEW regarding conservation pool depth and release strategy. The water quality stratification data (1996-2003) Greg shared is valuable and we appreciate your providing it to LRSA for further analysis. It was certainly a surprise to me that we may not be able to expect significant cold water benefits from increasing the pool depth but at least we have good data to assess this. I understand this is largely because the volume of water at the deeper zone is small and the fact that we have no option but to draw from the bottom. When the river does not need cold water it would be great if we had the ability to draw from the upper levels, like at Beltzville. Has any one assessed the cost of adding an upper tap?

The quality of fishing on the river given the new weekend release strategy of 750-1000 (up from 500-750) will need to be assessed. The letter Dean had sent Greg on 2/25 noted some concern here. A lot depends on mother nature and I suspect that like the last 2 years, we have another wet year coming along. It was great seeing the minimum flow increased from 50 to 250. We will eventually be back into a drought cycle (like 2001, 2002) and minimum flow maintenance is a key factor in sustaining fish in the main stem.

The ongoing efforts by Wildlands to remediate major AMD locations is a key to the long term improvement of the Lehigh. It was great to hear that plans are underway to secure funding to begin work on the Owl Hole AMD site. The LRSA is very willing to contribute manpower and technical support in these projects, particularly the new Lausanne Tunnel lagoon system, which will probably need some care and feeding to get off to a good start (lets hope the cattails thrive). The LRSA would like to learn more about what the plans are for monitoring the efficacy of this remediation project and we can certainly participate in taking water quality readings etc. LRSA is also interested in learning more about specific plans with regard to Buck Mountain AMD site and how me might be able to get involved with this remediation effort.

It is great to see that wild trout populations are reportedly healthy and on the rise. Are there any studies underway to assess which tributaries are making the biggest contributions to natural reproduction, where the wild trout populations are most prevalent and how far south they extend? As a trout stocking organization, the LRSA wants to be cognizant of these factors as we continue to refine our stocking strategies for the maximum advantage of the fishery and recreational value. My understanding is that it is detrimental to wild trout populations if stocking farm raised fish in the same locations. Assuming this to be true, it is important to have a good handle on the wild trout distribution.

Finally, we at LRSA are eager to continue our evaluation of water quality factors most important to the fish populations. One important indicator of this is the insect populations and diversity. We plan to conduct studies this spring on macroinvertabrates at key locations along the river. Collaboration here would be helpful and we may want to help raise a group to take the training class offered by Wildlands for this. Please send more information regarding scheduling and pricing so we can plan accordingly. I suspect that AMD discharge is one of the key impacts on insect life and getting a good baseline before remediation projects are in place will provide a basis for measuring improvement. AMD reduction should also affect a reduction in specific conductance and LRSA will periodically monitor this parameter at the confluence of Nesquehoning Creek and on a more regular basis (if not 24/7) at Northampton.

We look forward to our on-going collaboration on the FEW and AMD projects and the continued revitalization of the Lehigh River trout fishery.


Thank you for adding the recreational releases this year. I am a kayaker from New Jersey and have made several trips to the Lehigh in the past. I would have made more had there been enough water. The new release schedule is great.


It is wonderful that you are considering increasing the number of releases along the Lehigh River. Right now the 5 release schedule means that kayakers-- like me-- have to plan carefully for trips on a limited number of weekends. It can be very difficult to schedule trips and then "release weekend" becomes a very crowded event. More releases= less crowds per release= convenience and more appreciation for just how beautiful the area can be. This is an excellent plan and I hope you will implement it.


I am writing in support of the proposed management plan for the Lehigh River below the Francis E. Walter dam.

For the past dozen years, I have regularly paddled the Lehigh gorge during the scheduled June releases and also occasionally during autumn releases, including serving as trip leader for the Monocacy Canoe Club for the last five years or so. The increase in the number of release dates will be very much welcome.

The proposed release levels of 750-1000 cfs would be excellent. I have found that lower release levels, although still providing ample water to paddle the river, cause commercial rafts to jam up on the rocks and become hazards to those of us in canoes and kayaks.


I am writing to thank you for your support of the new release schedule and management plan for the Lehigh River. As a paddler and user of the river, I was overjoyed when I became aware of the proposed number of releases for 2005. I know that these releases will benefit not only the local paddling community, but also expand economic opportunities for the communities and businesses along the river corridor.


 I fully support the more frequent release of higher cfs levels out of the Francis Walter dam. This is the only resource in this area for regular White Water Recreation. I believe it will also bring more commerce to the Pocono area. Thank you for considering this proposal.


 It has been with great pleasure that I learned of the Corps intention of more frequent dam releases at the Francis E. Walter Dam on the Lehigh River. I fully support the Corps proposed release schedule and I am already looking forward to spend many more enjoyable whitewater hours paddling the River this year and hopefully in the years to come. Thank you very much!


Lehigh Valley Canoe Club is to be commended for their initiative regarding releases on the Lehigh (and to Army C of E as well). You can find more details, discussions, etc ont he message board for their club at www.lehighvalleycanoeclub.org This meeting was held on Feb 24th.


 To All, Last night about 60 people turned out on a snowy night to hear the ACOE proposal. It's great news. They propose, subject to change and the weather, to raise the pool from 1300 to 1335 from May till October and have a minimum daily release of 250 cfs for water quality and the critters. They also propose to add many more whitewater release days, currently we have 7 per year, the new proposal calls for 30 per year. Releases are proposed for every weekend in May and June, two weekends in July, August and September and one weekend in October. The May, early June, September and October releases will be 750-1000 cfs the other releases in June, July and August will be 750 cfs.

This is a historic starting point in my opinion. We will have an opportunity to comment on this plan through their web site. We will be working on an official club position.

Also at this site they plan on posting this plan soon. Some obvious sticking points are the fisherman needs and the ACOE asking stakeholder to cost share.


I wish to write in support of the plan to increase the pool level of the Francis Walter Dam and the # of recreational flows. My family and I are whitewater kayakers and we regularly do the Lehigh. Increasing the frequency of flow will be beneficial to the boaters, the rafting companies and other businesses in the area which we regularly frequent when we are there.


As Commodore of the Philadelphia Canoe Club, I'd like to convey that we are delighted at the attention that the US Army Corps has given recreational users of the Lehigh river with this project. Our club has over 200 members and a good many of us regularly utilize the top sections of the Lehigh River every year to conduct whitewater training and trips. The increased number of releases will permit us to be more flexible in our training programs and well as extend our overall enjoyment of the river. As well, more releases will likely make for a safer river since rafting and boating can me more evenly distributed over more releases - thus reducing the "boat-jams" that we have sometimes experienced in the past with the rare, warm weather releases.

We know that your primary mission is control of the watershed but when such a project as this is undertaken, it tells us that the Army Corps really does attempt to please recreational users. Thank you very much for listening!


I am writing to strongly support the proposed new plan for water flow management at the Francis Walter Dam. I have been an avid recreational whitewater kayaker for 12 years, and an active member of the Philadelphia Canoe Club. I "cut my teeth," boating-wise, on Lehigh whitewater, and since 1999 have also been a nationally certified whitewater instructor and taught many classes there. I have paddled there at flows from 400 to 8000 cfs. The visual beauty of the well-preserved gorge seen from the river will always be in my mind.

I am overjoyed that the relocated dam road now permits the possibility of about three times as many weekends of substantial recreational water releases as in the past, and most especially in the warmer months. It has always been frustrating to have such a wonderful resource so close to home (I live about 90 minutes from White Haven), but see water released in quantity only during the week in the summer, even after heavy rain.

I am pleased that the plan in the public announcement also acknowledges the stream use by anglers, whom we paddlers occasionally share the river with, and try to give a large, quiet berth to. I hope you can find a way to bring it to fruition as soon as possible.


I am writing to provide comment on the proposed release schedule for the Lehigh River. FYI, I was a river guide on the Lehigh for Whitewater Challengers for about 10 years (weekends only), and I am the prior Chairman of the Kayaking and Canoe Club of New York. I have run the Lehigh hundreds of times and many different levels.

First of all I would like to say that I am extremely happy about the proposal. Opening up the Lehigh for Summer recreational boating and expanding the Spring and Fall season is going to make the Lehigh a true destination. It will allow beginner boaters a place to hone there skills in the warm weather, will allow families to get out for rafting, canoeing and paddling during the warmer weather which is when they have the time and when it is safer to do so due to warmer water temperatures. I do have a few comments on the schedule, however. I personally feel that the paddling community would be better served with more releases in October and possibly even November. October is a prime paddling month and there are not many local options. It is a beautiful time to be on the river with the foliage and the water temeratures tend to be much warmer than in the Spring. I see that the schedule tends to be front-loaded, perhaps that is because water tends to be more plentiful then, I am not sure. But if possible I think more Fall releases would be great. If they cannot be guaranteed, perhaps they can be tentative based on levels with announcements made in advance?

Another comment I have is that while the proposed levels are decent, higher flows would really put the Lehigh on the map. Occasional flows of 1500-2000 based on water availability would make this a true class 3 run with excellent play. Perhaps one larger release per month (water permitting), or, perhaps higher flows on Sundays would be possible?

I am very happy with the developments as-is, but I wanted to provide my feedback just in case there is an ability to improve the plan per my comments. Please know that I am not complaining, I am overjoyed to know that I will be able to paddle the Lehigh every weekend all summer long should I desire. I look forward to teaching friends out there, taking my nieces and nephews rafting, etc. THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!


As a Philadelphia resident, it is great to see the increase in the amount of dam releases. Being a kayaker and one who enjoys the river it will be nice having more acces to the river without having to travel a great distance.


Thanks for deciding on more dam releases. This will bring enjoyment for many on the river this year.


I am in favor of all the added dam release dates, especially every weekend in May and June.


Thanks for deciding on more release this year. This will bring enjoyment for a lot of water enthusiasts.


Thanks to your hard work, many kayakers will be able to enjoy doing the thing they love, kayaking the Leigh.


I appreciate the increased number of releases that you have planned. It will certainly make my life as a paddler happier. It's not so easy to find a white water river to run during the "dry" months when there is no more snow run off.


I am writing to express my emphatic support for the newly developed Lehigh River management plan proposed by the Army Corps of Engineers for the FE Walter Dam. As an avid whitewater enthusiast, fisherman and outdoor lover, I have enjoyed the Lehigh River gorge on many levels for many years and believe that this proposed plan is an ideal compromise to suit the needs of the many people who enjoy the Lehigh River. Furthermore, having been employed on the Lehigh River as a river guide and being exposed to that business, I cannot emphasize enough how economically important the proposed thirty whitewater releases could be for the area. Dependable whitewater would serve as a continued draw to bring people not only to the park, but to the surrounding area, bringing much needed outside revenue to this region. For the sake of all involved, please do all that you can to support and implement this excellent plan for a treasured resource.


 I just wanted to let you know that I support the Army Corps' new plan for water releases from the Francis E. Walter Dam.

The Lehigh River is and integral part of the lifeline of the D&L corridor and it's a lifeline for me. Whether I'm hiking, biking or cross-country skiing along the land trail or kayaking on the water trail, the Lehigh River is truly a life-giving force. I have closely followed the development of the Lehigh valley Canoe Club's interest statement and carefully read the commentary regarding the pros and cons of the proposed releases. It appears that the releases would improve the water trail for kayakers and fish, alike!

Please give your support to the current proposed releases.


I wish to express my sincere gratitude for your support of the proposed dam releases for 2005 on the Lehigh River. It will be a boom to recreation in the area as well as an boost to the local economy.


This is just a short note of support for the schedule of Lehigh River releases from the Francis E. Walter Dam. I love using the Lehigh River to kayak, and I very much appreciate all of your efforts toward this plan. I am really excited about the release schedule for 2005. Thank you for all you've done to support this plan, and I am looking forward to taking advantage of the increased number of releases for 2005 and paddling the Lehigh River much more frequently.


I wanted to take a moment to thank you for your role in expanding the scheduled releases on the Lehigh River. The additional release dates along with the varying release levels will be a very positive thing for me personally as an avid whitewater paddler, and I believe for the businesses and tourism along the Lehigh River as well. I applaud your efforts.


 Friends have made me aware of your efforts regarding the above-mentioned Plan & I simply want to say thank you very much for same. They are very much appreciated by all of us who travel to enjoy the beauty & richness of this area.


I would like to thank all those involved in getting more recreational releases on the Lehigh River. I'm looking forward to bringing more of my canoeing and kayaking friends from NY to enjoy this wonderful resource more than twice a year for guaranteed water. Typically we will spend the weekend paddling the different sections of the Lehigh and then enjoying the hospitality of the local restaurants, camping, lodging facilities and wonderful shops in the area.


Thank you for your proposal to provide paddlers an enhanced release schedule for the 2005 season. While the flows are not optimal for paddlers, we understand you must reach a balance between all the stakeholders and the proposal seems a reasonable compromise at this stage. I understand the fishermen have registered some complaints about the new flows and hope they, too, will see that we cannot all get the optimal conditions for our personal use of the river. From a practical standpoint, the proposed spring flows do not seem that much altered from a normal year's flows, so I am somewhat confused by the fishermen's apparent objections. The big difference seems to be in mid summer when paddlers will get 2 weekends per month and the fishermen will get 2 weekends. That seems like an appropriate balance for those months. Thanks again.


Please know that I am delighted of the decision to increase the releases on the Lehigh. I am Commodore of the Mohawk Canoe Club that has over 250 members, many of whom are avid paddlers of the Lehigh. So with our grateful appreciation, we say thanks to all who had a part in this decision.


I recently visited your website and was excited about your 2005 release date schedule. I am a whitewater kayaker and I plan to travel to the Lehigh River a lot more this spring/summer to take advantage of the flow. I appreciate your consideration in opening up more dates for 2005. We have a few young enlisted men who are interested in kayaking and I have spread the word so they can have the opportunity to take advantage of this Pennsylvania "gem" while they are stationed at Carlisle Barracks.


I would like to thank you for your efforts in increasing the number of releases this year. I know this was not an easy process but I'm sure you'll find the results to the community and the watershed well worth it. As an environmental consultant for the last 20 years I've found that more users (not abusers) can result in a greater demand for better quality water which is what we all want, both fisherman and boaters (I'm both).


Many thanks for your support of the planned dam releases on the Lehigh River. It will be great for us paddlers, as well as a boost for that region's economy.


Thank you, thank you, thank you for your work towards improving utilization of FE Walters Dam and the Lehigh River. I know you have many interests to please and constraints that must be satisfied, and making everyone happy cannot be easy. But my husband and I are ecstatic with your proposal to increase releases, with the understanding that these can only be targets.. We are kayakers who have grown to love the Lehigh River. We will definitely take advantage of the increased opportunities this summer. Also, I believe there is some aspect of the new plan to vary the release amounts – that is a great idea and will really maximize the recreational benefits of the river, since paddler skills vary so widely.


As the Head Kayak Instructor for the Wilmington Trail Club, I am emailing you to express support for the US Army Corps of Engineers plan for increasing water storage and frequency of release flows (750 or more cfs) to the Lehigh River. Our kayaking club uses the Lehigh River for instructional purposes and for recreational trips for qualified students and members. Your plan will significantly increase the frequency of opportunities for continuing recreational outings throughout the year, and particularly during the typically drier months when local rivers have minimal flows.

Providing these additional release flows will greatly enhance recreational kayaking, rafting and fishing opportunities. Your plan represents an excellent balance between a variety of multiuse purposes and will generate significant additional economic benefits to the region.

Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to comment on your proposed plans.


A quick note of thanks for your collective efforts (in conjunction with the Lehigh Lovers United) in developing the new release schedule for the F.E. Walter Dam . The Lehigh Gorge is a great natural resource and the new schedule will allow more people to enjoy it. I frequently paddle several sections of the Lehigh and am looking forward to this spring and summer.


Thank you for your hard work and efforts to come to an amicable, forward-thinking proposal for the management of the Lehigh River resource. All around the country careful management of river water has allowed tourism, fisheries, and water-quality to flourish - just look at the Gauley River in West Virginia and the Summersville Dam as an example.

I have lived along the Lehigh River since 1987, and made my living part- and full-time on its waters since then and to this day. I run Northeast PA Kayak School, based in Weissport. While the additional water releases will not significantly affect what I do, I know what their effect will be. I'm on the river 180 days a year. I've seen the water quality increase. I've seen increasing numbers of Great Blue Herons, more fishermen, more drift boats - every year.

Your plan to manage the water behind the dam allows so many things to start to flourish. Local economies will benefit. I know that I bring over 500 people a year into this area, most of who are not from the Lehigh watershed. I know the kind of money they bring to the economy in lodging, food, fuel, entertainment, and tourism dollars. The drift boat fishermen must love the plan - their guests come from far and wide as the Lehigh River is now famous for its fishing. And water quality has improved dramatically and will continue.

I want to voice my support and thanks for the Flow Management plan, and to the significance of the May and June releases and the maintenance of good minimum flows all summer. The general health of the Lehigh Gorge and Lehigh Valley will be evident to all.

Keep up the good work!

"Luck is what happens when practice meets opportunity."


I would like to thank you for all your courtesy, time and diligence that was put into the improvement of the dam and water releases. I'm sure it will benefit many entities such as businesses, pleasure, etc. It can only get better from this point on. Whitewater paddlers won't have to leave the area to enjoy class III to IV water.


Hello I am a canoer and outdoor enthusiast,

On Thursday, February 24, the Army Corps came up with a proposal that fits most of the needs of the paddling public, and most of the needs of all the other interest groups. Now the time has come to support this plan and see it implemented!


I want to thank you for the progress being made toward the additional spring releases from the F.E.W. dam. The Lehigh is a wonderful resource, and these releases will make it much more accessible to the boating community. Thank you for hearing us, and for your response.


My family has been paddling the Lehigh River for over 20 years. It is a beautiful gorge and I have often wondered how wonderful it would be to do it more often. The Lehigh River was the first “white water river” my now 15-year-old son paddled in his kayak. In fact, over the years he has paddled the Lehigh River countless times and it honed his kayaking skills. Today at 15, he is one of the top kayak junior slalom racers in the world. I firmly believe the countless hours he spent on the Lehigh River when he was young, has helped him develop his slalom skills to what they are today. I am so pleased to hear that having more releases is being considered. Not only is it wonderful for the paddling community, it is wonderful for the economics of the area. Paddlers like to eat and they often frequent the local restaurants after paddling the river (I know we have!). They also stay at nearby hotels and campgrounds, and shop in the local shops. Thank you for consideration of having more releases. Spending the day canoeing on the Lehigh is a great way to spend a day!!


I am writing to support the Dam release proposal discussed at the meeting at Split Rock.


May I express my heartfelt appreciation for all the work that has been done to co-ordinate the water release from the Francis E. Walter Dam in the Poconos. The fishing community, paddlers and the economy will all benefit from the fine work being expedited by The Army Corps of Engineers.


Thank you all for the fine ongoing efforts being made with regard to Francis E. Walter Dam Flow Management. These considerations are appreciated very much.

I like the current 30 day releases plan and I'm requesting ACE honor its original plan to release all 30 days starting May 7th and continue for every weekend through July 5th, and then every other weekend beginning July 23 and continue through October 2nd. These releases could flow for 12 hours/day so fishermen can have the river in the afternoons every weekend. Note: According to PA-Fish and Boat, PA has 10,000 miles of trout streams, 1,000 of which are "World Class" and trout fishing has more than 10 times the opportunities as whitewater boating in PA.

I expect I will be spending money when visiting the Lehigh Valley area. Gas, snacks, dinners and more add up quickly as my budget shows, I spend a good chunk of change up there, ($25+ per trip) and that's just me and I drive an economy compact car and don't eat as much as my friends which I'm sure spend a much greater amount. 

Based on the expenses involved and of course the enjoyment factor, I need accurate advance information to attend a release and won't come if I'm disappointed, again and again.

Lastly, please consider paddlers having direct representation in decision making. This is our only way to be heard. We whitewater paddlers are ever growing community and deserve to be heard. We are a very big part of the Lehigh. We're are in it, and on it and sometimes it's in us when we gulp some down. I truly love the Lehigh. It's a fun, safe river I've had my son on. It's lots of fun!!!! We can challenge ourselves by ferrying across every rapid and going down all the drops knowing a pool will be there to catch us gently.


I have interest in the river and I SUPPORT proposed release schedule thank you


I am an avid whitewater kayaker, who would love to see more releases on the Lehigh River. Your efforts to support this matter would be greatly appreciated by many.


I would like to express my appreciation for the expanded release schedule for the Lehigh River, as currently proposed by the Army Corps of Engineers.

Since there are not many resources in this area for whitewater paddling the increased schedule is most appreciated. It is likely that I will paddle every one.


I want to send a note to express my thanks for your efforts to get more releases on the Lehigh River. This will not only provide the area with a more reliable tourism industry but also provide the general public with a solid river to learn the exciting sport of whitewater boating. I know everyone has worked very hard to accommodate many requests and the proposed schedule for this year looks like a win - win for everyone. Keep up the good work and we look forward to taking advantage of the extra water this season.


I read about the proposed plan to increase the number of dam releases on the Lehigh on your website, linked there from the Philadelphia Canoe Club. I read the posted pdf document, and am very excited that there may be more releases per year in the future. I am a big supporter of environmental preservation, but it seems that you've done quite a bit of extensive research and planning with many relevant groups to ensure minimal impact to the Lehigh Gorge and its surrounding environment. I also think that this would be a real positive move towards bettering the economy in the area.


I have been rafting the Lehigh for about eight years, and have taken up kayaking more recently. I would plan to raft and kayak the Lehigh quite a bit more if the number of releases were increased.


As a recreational kayaker and Rafter I am very excited to hear about the potential for more releases. The more releases the better. Perhaps some could be during the week, too, to benefit those of us who work most weekends.


I am a kayaker. The Lehigh is one of the most beautiful class III runs in the North East. I believe having additional releases at higher water levels will greatly benefit the local economy. It will attract more paddlers more often. It is a river many new paddlers cut there teeth on (not literally) including myself.

Please add as many release dates as possible.


Thank you to you and the Army Corps of Engineers for increasing the amount of water releases to the Lehigh River. I am 36 years old, originally from Philadelphia and began my kayaking on the Lehigh 15 years ago. The Philadelphia Canoe Club travels to the Lehigh River often to teach and practice. I was one of those people that took advantage of the premiere training environment the river has to offer. I revisit the Lehigh to assist with training, practice downriver racing and to enjoy the amazing scenery the river has to offer.

Once again, thank you for your efforts in making this natural area more accessible to the public.


To my disappointment I have heard that the number of releases has been reduced from the original plan. As I really love the river in my whitewater canoe, may I beg you to reconsider?

I understood that our friends the fisherman were not very happy with the original proposed plan. However, I think we can satisfy both the whitewater boaters and the fishermen by having limited times for the releases. E.g. by turning the water on at 2 am and off by 2 pm daily on release weekends, there should be enough water for the whitewater boaters before 4 pm , and good circumstances for the fisherman the same late afternoon and evening. I think this way I think we can make all of us happy!

I hope a solution can be found that pleases all of us.


I am a paddler from the Philadelphia Canoe Club in Philadelphia. I live in

Delaware County and have been an active paddler since the mid 80s. Just wanted to say how much we all appreciate the additional dam releases on the Lehigh this spring. There is nothing better than spending the day on the river, then dinner in town after the take-out!


Kutztown rep for LVCC and also on Lehigh lovers united comity. I support the planed 30 release days as planned 12 hour per day releases an .As Rich B reminded us according to PA-Fish and Boat Pennsylvania has 10,000 miles of trout streams, 1000 of which are "World Class" and trout fishing has more than 10 times the opportunities as WW boating in Pa.

As boaters we need accurate advance information to attend a release and will not come if disappointed, again and again.

As a paddler we love the river and want direct representation in the decision making process. And we thank you for hearing our voices

We support the local economy i.e.: fuel, food, gear and supplies as well as lodging and turnpike tolls an entertainment. So it only goes to show we should have a say on some of the decision making process........

Thank you again for your support of our WW community we hope we can all work together.


While I'm not currently in a position to take advantage of the proposed whitewater release schedule as I'm deployed to Iraq, reading about the schedule was highly exciting. Being able to go on the river in the middle of the summer without having to monitor the weather forecast for rain or check the webpage to ensure a sufficient release will make weekend planning significantly easier.

This is a wonderful plan. Thanks for the opportunity, that I hope to capitalize on when I return.


I am looking for the 2005 dam release schedule for the Lehigh River.


I'm writing to voice my support for the proposed Lehigh release schedule for 2005. I'm a frequent user of the river for both boating and fishing and the proposed schedule meets both of those needs. This produces a significant opportunities to enjoy the river for most of the summer.


Hi... Just a note of support for the river and scheduled release. A good move for one and all !


My wife and I are whitewater paddlers who live in southern Chester County in Pennsylvania. We support the proposals to increase (water levels permitting) the number and volume of increases on the Lehigh River. From reading through the proposal that was made available on the internet, it appears that the releases can be accomplished with minimal, adverse effect on water quality, habitat upstream from the dam, and fishing downstream from the dam.

Assuming this is so, then the increased chances for recreation would certainly be welcomed by all whitewater paddlers and would also have economic benefit to the region.


To reiterate, we support the proposed changes to water flow management at F.E. Walter dam.


I am thrilled to hear that you are planning to release water from Walter Dam on additional weekends in the summer and late spring.

I am a whitewater kayaker and have been paddling on the Lehigh for over ten years, mostly with the Philadelphia Canoe Club. We do a considerable amount of training, introducing new people to the sport. Having scheduled releases during the summer will make more courses and trips possible. That's good for us, for our students, and for the economy of the towns around the Lehigh gorge.

I have a couple of comments about the planned releases. First, on the schedule, I hope that you can include one more release later in October, comparable to the last release of previous years. This has often been my favorite trip of the year because the gorge is usually at the peak of fall color. It is truly a beautiful time to be on the river. Second, on release level, I would encourage you to have releases at the high end of the range that you propose, specifically 1000 cfs. It is my observation that there are several places on the river which are hazardous for pinning on rocks at lower levels but become clearer to run and therefore safer as the level rises to 1000 cfs or more. This is particularly true of No Way Rapid and Wilhoyt's Rock Rapid.

Thank you for your efforts in making these releases possible. I look forward to a great summer on the Lehigh.


My husband and I would like to thank you and the Army Corps of Engineers for your work on increasing the number of Lehigh River dam releases. My husband and I met while kayaking and have since had a daughter who is 7 1/2 months old. My family is from the White Haven and Wilkes-Barre area and so releases on the Lehigh River will allow my husband and me a chance to spend time together on the river while my parents get much-needed quality time with their granddaughter...a win/win situation for all!!

We look forward to the summer months and enjoying the beauty of the Lehigh River Gorge.


Thank you for your efforts to maintain a reasonable & balanced schedule of releases on the Lehigh.

In addition to supporting local economies along the river, these releases are personally important to me.

Paddling has been a major factor in my recovery from cancer, and the Lehigh is one of the few rivers I can paddle.


I would like to tell you how pleased my family and I are that the Francis Walter Dam will be releasing more often this summer. We are a kayaking family now spread out in NY and PA, who look forward to the time we can spend together on the river. With more releases scheduled, we're already planning our summer. I think this is a wonderful way to utilize the economy that boating brings to communities as well as managing our natural resources. I hope the Army Corps of Engineers continues with this progressive view.


I've been a kayaker in the Philadelphia area for almost 10 years, as well as a member of Philadelphia Canoe Club. I want to let you know what a valuable resource the Lehigh is for the region and how much we rely on it to teach, play, and replenish ourselves through kayaking.

I urge you to increase the number of releases each year. It would be such a great asset to the sport and the region to have more recreational time on the Lehigh.


We come from all over (NYS for me) to whitewater in the Lehigh and I'd like to take the time to thank you all for your efforts and to let you know that it is definitely appreciated!


As a paddler and a voter, I am happy to hear that there are to be more river releases in the future.


I am a Pennsylvania resident, paddler, and a fisherman with a great interest in the Lehigh River. I just wanted to let you know that I am very excited about and support the proposed release schedule. Thank you for your consideration.


I am writing to express my support for the proposal to have more water releases at the 750 cfs and above levels. The Lehigh River is a wonderful place for children and adults to experience nature and to learn outdoor recreation, such as paddling.

In our family, white water paddling is a tradition. My husband and I bring our daughter to the river to hike nearby, and when she is older we hope to teach her to paddle. My father in law has been paddling for many years, and this is a wonderful sport that the different generations can enjoy together.

My father in law, husband and I enjoy paddling together on the Lehigh, and hope to spend more time doing so.


Thank you for supporting the proposal to increase the number of releases on the Lehigh River.


I am a resident of PA and a open canoe paddler belonging to the Philadelphia Canoe Club and the Wooden Canoe Heritage Assoc. I often paddle the Lehigh but it never seems enough. I understand that there will be additional releases this year, thank you very much. The Lehigh is one of the best places to paddle and I look forward to more time on the river.


I am a paddler from Chester County, PA and I am on the Lehigh as much as

I can. The new proposed schedule looks awesome - thanks for considering us paddlers - we will do our best to help you in our shared endeavors.


Thanks for the expanded release schedule. I am a paddler on the Lehigh, for more than 20 years, and your new schedule is great. Give us more dates if possible.


I am a paddler who lives in Pennsylvania. I am writing today to let you know that I am grateful for all the work the Corps has done to improve the fishing and paddling opportunities for us this year. I support and congratulate you for all your efforts and hard work.


 It is with great anticipation that I look forward to the acceptance of the proposed water release schedule. We use the releases to give many young adults their first white water kayak trips and I often marvel at the tremendous joy and exhilaration that comes from the experience. I applaud your efforts on behalf of all who use and enjoy this resource.


As an avid paddler and whitewater enthusiast, I continue to support Senator Greenleaf's efforts to have more whitewater releases.


As someone who lives quite close (Doylestown, Pa), and who has been paddling the Lehigh, for more than 20 years, I think your proposal to markedly increase the number of releases this year, is a super idea. As well as making a large number of local hard boat paddlers happy, I think that this will increase the usage of that area for rafting and recreational/commercial activities.


I want you to know how pleased I am with the plans to increase water flow in the Lehigh Valley. I have avoided the area in the summer because of dry weekends, the releases from the dam will enable my friends to use the Lehigh all summer.


I have been boating on the White Haven to Jim Thorpe section of the Lehigh for many years. I think it is great that the possibility now exists to have many more releases throughout the year due to the greater capacity of the dam. This can only be a positive thing for the surrounding region due to money spent by visiting boaters and tourists. Anytime you can promote the nondestructive use of our natural resources I think everyone comes out ahead. Thank you for the effort and I look forward to many more pleasant days paddling down the Lehigh.


I am a member of the Philadelphia Canoe Club and a kayaker. I want to say thanks very much for scheduling more water releases this year. I hope very much that other groups/organizations/townspeople will also benefit.

I appreciate the fine work the Corps does all over the United States and encourage the fine work to continue.


I want to thank you for the efforts you are putting into an increased number of releases from the Frances Walter Dam on the Lehigh. As paddler living in Bucks County I know I will make an increased number of trips to Whitehaven and the surrounding areas. My friends and I make it a habit to have dinner in town as well as stop at the local market for lunch supplies. We also fill up the cars at the gas stations near the Northeast Extension. We feel a loyalty to support businesses in the areas we paddle. Hopefully the increased number of releases will increase the economic growth in the area. Again, thanks for the efforts on behalf of the paddlers.


I was very please to hear you are going thru with the proposed relief schedule, it will most definitely be a boost to the economy and make a lot of citizens, Fisherman etc. etc. very happy.


 

WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU!
Help us keep improving our website... Send your questions, problems and comments to the Philadelphia District Web Master

This is an official US Government information system for authorized use only.
It is intended for unclassified, non-sensitive, non-privacy act information.